Rollup merge of #105980 - goffrie:waker-drop, r=thomcc
Refer to "Waker" rather than "RawWaker" in `drop` comment In my view this is technically more correct as `Waker` actually implements `Drop` (which calls the `drop` method) whereas `RawWaker` does not.
This commit is contained in:
commit
03a763c5c8
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ pub struct RawWakerVTable {
|
|||
/// pointer.
|
||||
wake_by_ref: unsafe fn(*const ()),
|
||||
|
||||
/// This function gets called when a [`RawWaker`] gets dropped.
|
||||
/// This function gets called when a [`Waker`] gets dropped.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The implementation of this function must make sure to release any
|
||||
/// resources that are associated with this instance of a [`RawWaker`] and
|
||||
|
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ impl RawWakerVTable {
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// # `drop`
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This function gets called when a [`RawWaker`] gets dropped.
|
||||
/// This function gets called when a [`Waker`] gets dropped.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The implementation of this function must make sure to release any
|
||||
/// resources that are associated with this instance of a [`RawWaker`] and
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue