more nits
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca49a37390
commit
0e20155662
5 changed files with 65 additions and 49 deletions
|
@ -4433,42 +4433,25 @@ declare_lint! {
|
|||
/// ```rust,compile_fail
|
||||
/// #![deny(coinductive_overlap_in_coherence)]
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// use std::borrow::Borrow;
|
||||
/// use std::cmp::Ordering;
|
||||
/// use std::marker::PhantomData;
|
||||
/// trait CyclicTrait {}
|
||||
/// impl<T: CyclicTrait> CyclicTrait for T {}
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
|
||||
/// pub(crate) struct Interval<T>(T);
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
||||
/// where
|
||||
/// Q: PartialOrd,
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// fn eq(&self, other: &Q) -> bool {
|
||||
/// todo!()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// impl<T, Q> PartialOrd<Q> for Interval<T>
|
||||
/// where
|
||||
/// Q: PartialOrd,
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Q) -> Option<Ordering> {
|
||||
/// todo!()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// trait Trait {}
|
||||
/// impl<T: CyclicTrait> Trait for T {}
|
||||
/// // conflicting impl with the above
|
||||
/// impl Trait for u8 {}
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// {{produces}}
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Explanation
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The manual impl of `PartialEq` impl overlaps with the `derive`, since
|
||||
/// if we replace `Q = Interval<T>`, then the second impl leads to a cycle:
|
||||
/// `PartialOrd for Interval<T> where Interval<T>: PartialOrd`. This cycle
|
||||
/// currently causes the compiler to consider `Interval<T>: PartialOrd` to not
|
||||
/// hold, causing the two implementations to be disjoint. This will change in
|
||||
/// a future release.
|
||||
/// We have two choices for impl which satisfy `u8: Trait`: the blanket impl
|
||||
/// for generic `T`, and the direct impl for `u8`. These two impls nominally
|
||||
/// overlap, since we can infer `T = u8` in the former impl, but since the where
|
||||
/// clause `u8: CyclicTrait` would end up resulting in a cycle (since it depends
|
||||
/// on itself), the blanket impl is not considered to hold for `u8`. This will
|
||||
/// change in a future release.
|
||||
pub COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
|
||||
Warn,
|
||||
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -231,10 +231,29 @@ fn overlap<'tcx>(
|
|||
COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE,
|
||||
infcx.tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id(first_local_impl),
|
||||
infcx.tcx.def_span(first_local_impl),
|
||||
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
||||
overlap in the future",
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"implementations {} will conflict in the future",
|
||||
match impl1_header.trait_ref {
|
||||
Some(trait_ref) => {
|
||||
let trait_ref = infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(trait_ref);
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"of `{}` for `{}`",
|
||||
trait_ref.print_only_trait_path(),
|
||||
trait_ref.self_ty()
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => format!(
|
||||
"for `{}`",
|
||||
infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(impl1_header.self_ty)
|
||||
),
|
||||
},
|
||||
),
|
||||
|lint| {
|
||||
lint.span_label(
|
||||
lint.note(
|
||||
"impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to \
|
||||
overlap in the future",
|
||||
)
|
||||
.span_label(
|
||||
infcx.tcx.def_span(impl1_header.impl_def_id),
|
||||
"the first impl is here",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -245,8 +264,12 @@ fn overlap<'tcx>(
|
|||
if !failing_obligation.cause.span.is_dummy() {
|
||||
lint.span_label(
|
||||
failing_obligation.cause.span,
|
||||
"this where-clause causes a cycle, but it may be treated \
|
||||
as possibly holding in the future, causing the impls to overlap",
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"`{}` may be considered to hold in future releases, \
|
||||
causing the impls to overlap",
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.resolve_vars_if_possible(failing_obligation.predicate)
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
lint
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -202,10 +202,25 @@ enum BuiltinImplConditions<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
|
||||
pub enum TreatInductiveCycleAs {
|
||||
/// This is the previous behavior, where `Recur` represents an inductive
|
||||
/// cycle that is known not to hold. This is not forwards-compatible with
|
||||
/// coinduction, and will be deprecated. This is the default behavior
|
||||
/// of the old trait solver due to back-compat reasons.
|
||||
Recur,
|
||||
/// This is the behavior of the new trait solver, where inductive cycles
|
||||
/// are treated as ambiguous and possibly holding.
|
||||
Ambig,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl From<TreatInductiveCycleAs> for EvaluationResult {
|
||||
fn from(treat: TreatInductiveCycleAs) -> EvaluationResult {
|
||||
match treat {
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => EvaluatedToUnknown,
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => EvaluatedToRecur,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn new(infcx: &'cx InferCtxt<'tcx>) -> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
SelectionContext {
|
||||
|
@ -223,6 +238,9 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
treat_inductive_cycle: TreatInductiveCycleAs,
|
||||
f: impl FnOnce(&mut Self) -> T,
|
||||
) -> T {
|
||||
// Should be executed in a context where caching is disabled,
|
||||
// otherwise the cache is poisoned with the temporary result.
|
||||
assert!(self.is_intercrate());
|
||||
let treat_inductive_cycle =
|
||||
std::mem::replace(&mut self.treat_inductive_cycle, treat_inductive_cycle);
|
||||
let value = f(self);
|
||||
|
@ -741,10 +759,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
stack.update_reached_depth(stack_arg.1);
|
||||
return Ok(EvaluatedToOk);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
match self.treat_inductive_cycle {
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => return Ok(EvaluatedToUnknown),
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => return Ok(EvaluatedToRecur),
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Ok(self.treat_inductive_cycle.into());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Ok(EvaluatedToOk);
|
||||
|
@ -862,10 +877,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::FailedNormalization => Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig),
|
||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::Recursive => match self.treat_inductive_cycle {
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => return Ok(EvaluatedToUnknown),
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => return Ok(EvaluatedToRecur),
|
||||
},
|
||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::Recursive => Ok(self.treat_inductive_cycle.into()),
|
||||
ProjectAndUnifyResult::MismatchedProjectionTypes(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1179,10 +1191,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
Some(EvaluatedToOk)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
debug!("evaluate_stack --> recursive, inductive");
|
||||
match self.treat_inductive_cycle {
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Ambig => Some(EvaluatedToUnknown),
|
||||
TreatInductiveCycleAs::Recur => Some(EvaluatedToRecur),
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some(self.treat_inductive_cycle.into())
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ pub(crate) struct Interval<T>(PhantomData<T>);
|
|||
// `Interval<?1>: PartialOrd<Interval<?1>>` candidate which results
|
||||
// in a - currently inductive - cycle.
|
||||
impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
||||
//~^ ERROR impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
|
||||
//~^ ERROR implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
|
||||
//~| WARN this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Borrow<Q>,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
error: impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
|
||||
error: implementations of `PartialEq<Interval<_>>` for `Interval<_>` will conflict in the future
|
||||
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:13:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | #[derive(PartialEq, Default)]
|
||||
|
@ -8,10 +8,11 @@ LL | impl<T, Q> PartialEq<Q> for Interval<T>
|
|||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the first impl is here
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | Q: ?Sized + PartialOrd,
|
||||
| ---------- this where-clause causes a cycle, but it may be treated as possibly holding in the future, causing the impls to overlap
|
||||
| ---------- `Interval<_>: PartialOrd` may be considered to hold in future releases, causing the impls to overlap
|
||||
|
|
||||
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
|
||||
= note: for more information, see issue #114040 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040>
|
||||
= note: impls that are not considered to overlap may be considered to overlap in the future
|
||||
note: the lint level is defined here
|
||||
--> $DIR/warn-when-cycle-is-error-in-coherence.rs:1:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue