dedup GoalEvaluationStep
and GoalCandidate
also handle 2 panics when dumping proof trees for the whole test suite - need to actually tell the proof tree builder about overflow - need to handle a recursion_limit of 0 :<
This commit is contained in:
parent
8225a2e9ec
commit
eac55eec9e
5 changed files with 75 additions and 56 deletions
|
@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ pub struct CanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub enum GoalEvaluationKind<'tcx> {
|
||||
Overflow,
|
||||
CacheHit(CacheHit),
|
||||
Uncached { revisions: Vec<GoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>> },
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -50,10 +51,8 @@ pub struct AddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
|||
pub struct GoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub instantiated_goal: QueryInput<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub added_goals_evaluations: Vec<AddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub candidates: Vec<GoalCandidate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub result: QueryResult<'tcx>,
|
||||
/// The actual evaluation of the goal, always `ProbeKind::Root`.
|
||||
pub evaluation: GoalCandidate<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
|
@ -63,8 +62,16 @@ pub struct GoalCandidate<'tcx> {
|
|||
pub kind: ProbeKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Debug for GoalCandidate<'_> {
|
||||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
|
||||
ProofTreeFormatter::new(f).format_candidate(self)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
|
||||
pub enum ProbeKind<'tcx> {
|
||||
/// The root inference context while proving a goal.
|
||||
Root { result: QueryResult<'tcx> },
|
||||
/// Probe entered when normalizing the self ty during candidate assembly
|
||||
NormalizedSelfTyAssembly,
|
||||
/// Some candidate to prove the current goal.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ProofTreeFormatter<'a, 'b> {
|
|||
writeln!(self.f, "GOAL: {:?}", eval.goal)?;
|
||||
|
||||
match &eval.kind {
|
||||
GoalEvaluationKind::Overflow => {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "OVERFLOW: {:?}", eval.result)
|
||||
}
|
||||
GoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(CacheHit::Global) => {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "GLOBAL CACHE HIT: {:?}", eval.result)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -76,7 +79,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ProofTreeFormatter<'a, 'b> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
GoalEvaluationKind::Uncached { revisions } => {
|
||||
for (n, step) in revisions.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "REVISION {n}: {:?}", step.result)?;
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "REVISION {n}")?;
|
||||
self.nested(|this| this.format_evaluation_step(step))?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "RESULT: {:?}", eval.result)
|
||||
|
@ -89,19 +92,14 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ProofTreeFormatter<'a, 'b> {
|
|||
evaluation_step: &GoalEvaluationStep<'_>,
|
||||
) -> std::fmt::Result {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "INSTANTIATED: {:?}", evaluation_step.instantiated_goal)?;
|
||||
|
||||
for candidate in &evaluation_step.candidates {
|
||||
self.nested(|this| this.format_candidate(candidate))?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for nested in &evaluation_step.added_goals_evaluations {
|
||||
self.nested(|this| this.format_added_goals_evaluation(nested))?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
self.format_candidate(&evaluation_step.evaluation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn format_candidate(&mut self, candidate: &GoalCandidate<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
|
||||
match &candidate.kind {
|
||||
ProbeKind::Root { result } => {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "ROOT RESULT: {result:?}")
|
||||
}
|
||||
ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly => {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "NORMALIZING SELF TY FOR ASSEMBLY:")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,28 +28,34 @@ impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
pub enum WipGoalEvaluationKind {
|
||||
Overflow,
|
||||
CacheHit(CacheHit),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug)]
|
||||
pub struct WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub goal: CanonicalInput<'tcx>,
|
||||
pub cache_hit: Option<CacheHit>,
|
||||
pub evaluation_steps: Vec<WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: Option<WipGoalEvaluationKind>,
|
||||
pub revisions: Vec<WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub result: Option<QueryResult<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
let kind = match self.cache_hit {
|
||||
Some(hit) => inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(hit),
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
assert!(!self.evaluation_steps.is_empty());
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Uncached {
|
||||
revisions: self
|
||||
.evaluation_steps
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(WipGoalEvaluationStep::finalize)
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
let kind = match self.kind {
|
||||
Some(WipGoalEvaluationKind::Overflow) => inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Overflow,
|
||||
Some(WipGoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(hit)) => {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(hit)
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => inspect::GoalEvaluationKind::Uncached {
|
||||
revisions: self
|
||||
.revisions
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(WipGoalEvaluationStep::finalize)
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
inspect::CanonicalGoalEvaluation { goal: self.goal, kind, result: self.result.unwrap() }
|
||||
|
@ -81,24 +87,17 @@ impl<'tcx> WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
|||
pub struct WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub instantiated_goal: QueryInput<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub added_goals_evaluations: Vec<WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub candidates: Vec<WipGoalCandidate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
pub result: Option<QueryResult<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub evaluation: WipGoalCandidate<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::GoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
instantiated_goal: self.instantiated_goal,
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations: self
|
||||
.added_goals_evaluations
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation::finalize)
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
candidates: self.candidates.into_iter().map(WipGoalCandidate::finalize).collect(),
|
||||
result: self.result.unwrap(),
|
||||
let evaluation = self.evaluation.finalize();
|
||||
match evaluation.kind {
|
||||
ProbeKind::Root { .. } => (),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!("unexpected root evaluation: {evaluation:?}"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationStep { instantiated_goal: self.instantiated_goal, evaluation }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -269,8 +268,8 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation {
|
||||
goal,
|
||||
cache_hit: None,
|
||||
evaluation_steps: vec![],
|
||||
kind: None,
|
||||
revisions: vec![],
|
||||
result: None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -287,11 +286,11 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn cache_hit(&mut self, cache_hit: CacheHit) {
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation_kind(&mut self, kind: WipGoalEvaluationKind) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(canonical_goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(canonical_goal_evaluation.cache_hit.replace(cache_hit), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(canonical_goal_evaluation.kind.replace(kind), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -330,9 +329,11 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.nested(|| WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
instantiated_goal,
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
candidates: vec![],
|
||||
result: None,
|
||||
evaluation: WipGoalCandidate {
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
candidates: vec![],
|
||||
kind: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation_step(&mut self, goal_evaluation_step: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
|
@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
DebugSolver::CanonicalGoalEvaluation(canonical_goal_evaluations),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(goal_evaluation_step),
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
canonical_goal_evaluations.evaluation_steps.push(goal_evaluation_step);
|
||||
canonical_goal_evaluations.revisions.push(goal_evaluation_step);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -373,7 +374,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
match (this, candidate.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate { candidates, .. })
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep { candidates, .. }),
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
evaluation: WipGoalCandidate { candidates, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(candidate),
|
||||
) => candidates.push(candidate),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
|
@ -412,7 +416,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
match (this, added_goals_evaluation.state.unwrap().tree) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
added_goals_evaluations,
|
||||
evaluation: WipGoalCandidate { added_goals_evaluations, .. },
|
||||
..
|
||||
})
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate {
|
||||
|
@ -432,7 +436,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
|||
assert_eq!(canonical_goal_evaluation.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(evaluation_step) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(evaluation_step.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
evaluation_step.evaluation.kind.replace(ProbeKind::Root { result }),
|
||||
None
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, goals))]
|
||||
fn add_goals(&mut self, goals: impl IntoIterator<Item = Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>) {
|
||||
let current_len = self.nested_goals.goals.len();
|
||||
self.nested_goals.goals.extend(goals);
|
||||
debug!("added_goals={:?}", &self.nested_goals.goals[current_len..]);
|
||||
for goal in goals {
|
||||
self.add_goal(goal);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Try to merge multiple possible ways to prove a goal, if that is not possible returns `None`.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
|||
mod cache;
|
||||
|
||||
use self::cache::ProvisionalEntry;
|
||||
use super::inspect;
|
||||
use super::inspect::ProofTreeBuilder;
|
||||
use super::SolverMode;
|
||||
use cache::ProvisionalCache;
|
||||
|
@ -185,6 +186,8 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
if let Some(last) = self.stack.raw.last_mut() {
|
||||
last.encountered_overflow = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
inspect.goal_evaluation_kind(inspect::WipGoalEvaluationKind::Overflow);
|
||||
return Self::response_no_constraints(tcx, input, Certainty::OVERFLOW);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -200,7 +203,9 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
available_depth,
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
inspect.cache_hit(CacheHit::Global);
|
||||
inspect.goal_evaluation_kind(inspect::WipGoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(
|
||||
CacheHit::Global,
|
||||
));
|
||||
self.on_cache_hit(reached_depth, encountered_overflow);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -235,7 +240,9 @@ impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
|
|||
// Finally we can return either the provisional response for that goal if we have a
|
||||
// coinductive cycle or an ambiguous result if the cycle is inductive.
|
||||
Entry::Occupied(entry_index) => {
|
||||
inspect.cache_hit(CacheHit::Provisional);
|
||||
inspect.goal_evaluation_kind(inspect::WipGoalEvaluationKind::CacheHit(
|
||||
CacheHit::Provisional,
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
let entry_index = *entry_index.get();
|
||||
let stack_depth = cache.depth(entry_index);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue