dont canonicalize in try_unify_abstract_consts and erase regions instead
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ff1edbe5e
commit
fe69a5cf0c
2 changed files with 22 additions and 29 deletions
|
@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ mod sub;
|
|||
pub mod type_variable;
|
||||
mod undo_log;
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::infer::canonical::OriginalQueryValues;
|
||||
pub use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key;
|
||||
|
||||
#[must_use]
|
||||
|
@ -695,14 +694,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
) -> bool {
|
||||
// Reject any attempt to unify two unevaluated constants that contain inference
|
||||
// variables, since inference variables in queries lead to ICEs.
|
||||
if a.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() || b.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
||||
debug!("a or b contain infer vars in its substs -> cannot unify");
|
||||
if a.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts()
|
||||
|| b.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts()
|
||||
|| param_env.has_infer_types_or_consts()
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("a or b or param_env contain infer vars in its substs -> cannot unify");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let canonical = self.canonicalize_query((a, b), &mut OriginalQueryValues::default());
|
||||
let erased_args = self.tcx.erase_regions((a, b));
|
||||
let erased_param_env = self.tcx.erase_regions(param_env);
|
||||
debug!("after erase_regions args: {:?}, param_env: {:?}", erased_args, param_env);
|
||||
|
||||
self.tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(param_env.and(canonical.value))
|
||||
self.tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(erased_param_env.and(erased_args))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn is_in_snapshot(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
|
@ -1619,9 +1623,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
// variables
|
||||
if substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
||||
debug!("substs have infer types or consts: {:?}", substs);
|
||||
if substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
||||
return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let param_env_erased = self.tcx.erase_regions(param_env);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -195,11 +195,13 @@ fn satisfied_from_param_env<'tcx>(
|
|||
match pred.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::ConstEvaluatable(uv) => {
|
||||
if let Some(b_ct) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)? {
|
||||
let const_unify_ctxt = ConstUnifyCtxt::new(tcx, param_env);
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to unify with each subtree in the AbstractConst to allow for
|
||||
// `N + 1` being const evaluatable even if theres only a `ConstEvaluatable`
|
||||
// predicate for `(N + 1) * 2`
|
||||
let result = walk_abstract_const(tcx, b_ct, |b_ct| {
|
||||
match try_unify(tcx, ct, b_ct, param_env) {
|
||||
match const_unify_ctxt.try_unify(ct, b_ct) {
|
||||
true => ControlFlow::BREAK,
|
||||
false => ControlFlow::CONTINUE,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -569,18 +571,6 @@ pub(super) fn thir_abstract_const<'tcx>(
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(tcx), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
a: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
|
||||
b: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let const_unify_ctxt = ConstUnifyCtxt::new(tcx, param_env);
|
||||
const_unify_ctxt.try_unify_inner(a, b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
(a, b): (ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>, ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>),
|
||||
|
@ -589,7 +579,8 @@ pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
|
|||
(|| {
|
||||
if let Some(a) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, a)? {
|
||||
if let Some(b) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, b)? {
|
||||
return Ok(try_unify(tcx, a, b, param_env));
|
||||
let const_unify_ctxt = ConstUnifyCtxt::new(tcx, param_env);
|
||||
return Ok(const_unify_ctxt.try_unify(a, b));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -666,7 +657,7 @@ impl<'tcx> ConstUnifyCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
|
||||
/// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
fn try_unify_inner(&self, a: AbstractConst<'tcx>, b: AbstractConst<'tcx>) -> bool {
|
||||
fn try_unify(&self, a: AbstractConst<'tcx>, b: AbstractConst<'tcx>) -> bool {
|
||||
let a = if let Some(a) = self.try_replace_substs_in_root(a) {
|
||||
a
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -723,23 +714,23 @@ impl<'tcx> ConstUnifyCtxt<'tcx> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Node::Binop(a_op, al, ar), Node::Binop(b_op, bl, br)) if a_op == b_op => {
|
||||
self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(al), b.subtree(bl))
|
||||
&& self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(ar), b.subtree(br))
|
||||
self.try_unify(a.subtree(al), b.subtree(bl))
|
||||
&& self.try_unify(a.subtree(ar), b.subtree(br))
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Node::UnaryOp(a_op, av), Node::UnaryOp(b_op, bv)) if a_op == b_op => {
|
||||
self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(av), b.subtree(bv))
|
||||
self.try_unify(a.subtree(av), b.subtree(bv))
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Node::FunctionCall(a_f, a_args), Node::FunctionCall(b_f, b_args))
|
||||
if a_args.len() == b_args.len() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(a_f), b.subtree(b_f))
|
||||
self.try_unify(a.subtree(a_f), b.subtree(b_f))
|
||||
&& iter::zip(a_args, b_args)
|
||||
.all(|(&an, &bn)| self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(an), b.subtree(bn)))
|
||||
.all(|(&an, &bn)| self.try_unify(a.subtree(an), b.subtree(bn)))
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Node::Cast(a_kind, a_operand, a_ty), Node::Cast(b_kind, b_operand, b_ty))
|
||||
if (a_ty == b_ty) && (a_kind == b_kind) =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(a_operand), b.subtree(b_operand))
|
||||
self.try_unify(a.subtree(a_operand), b.subtree(b_operand))
|
||||
}
|
||||
// use this over `_ => false` to make adding variants to `Node` less error prone
|
||||
(Node::Cast(..), _)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue