Try to evaluate constants in legacy mangling
Best reviewed commit by commit.
It seems kind of odd to treat literals differently from unevaluated free constants. So let's evaluate those constants and only fall back to `_` rendering if that fails to result in an integral constant
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133900 (Advent of `tests/ui` (misc cleanups and improvements) [1/N])
- #133937 (Keep track of parse errors in `mod`s and don't emit resolve errors for paths involving them)
- #133938 (`rustc_mir_dataflow` cleanups, including some renamings)
- #134058 (interpret: reduce usage of TypingEnv::fully_monomorphized)
- #134130 (Stop using driver queries in the public API)
- #134140 (Add AST support for unsafe binders)
- #134229 (Fix typos in docs on provenance)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
forbid toggling x87 and fpregs on hard-float targets
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344, follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129884:
The `x87` target feature on x86 and the `fpregs` target feature on ARM must not be disabled on a hardfloat target, as that would change the float ABI. However, *enabling* `fpregs` on ARM is [explicitly requested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130988) as it seems to be useful. Therefore, we need to refine the distinction of "forbidden" target features and "allowed" target features: all (un)stable target features can determine on a per-target basis whether they should be allowed to be toggled or not. `fpregs` then checks whether the current target has the `soft-float` feature, and if yes, `fpregs` is permitted -- otherwise, it is not. (Same for `x87` on x86).
Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132351. Since `fpregs` and `x87` can be enabled on some builds and disabled on others, it would make sense that one can query it via `cfg`. Therefore, I made them behave in `cfg` like any other unstable target feature.
The first commit prepares the infrastructure, but does not change behavior. The second commit then wires up `fpregs` and `x87` with that new infrastructure.
r? `@workingjubilee`
Add AST support for unsafe binders
I'm splitting up #130514 into pieces. It's impossible for me to keep up with a huge PR like that. I'll land type system support for this next, probably w/o MIR lowering, which will come later.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@BoxyUwU` and `@lcnr` who also may want to look at this, though this PR doesn't do too much yet
Keep track of parse errors in `mod`s and don't emit resolve errors for paths involving them
When we expand a `mod foo;` and parse `foo.rs`, we now track whether that file had an unrecovered parse error that reached the end of the file. If so, we keep that information around in the HIR and mark its `DefId` in the `Resolver`. When resolving a path like `foo::bar`, we do not emit any errors for "`bar` not found in `foo`", as we know that the parse error might have caused `bar` to not be parsed and accounted for.
When this happens in an existing project, every path referencing `foo` would be an irrelevant compile error. Instead, we now skip emitting anything until `foo.rs` is fixed. Tellingly enough, we didn't have any test for errors caused by expansion of `mod`s with parse errors.
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97734.
Advent of `tests/ui` (misc cleanups and improvements) [1/N]
Part of #133895.
Misc improvements to some ui tests immediately under `tests/ui/`.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit.
Thanks `@clubby789` for PR title suggestion 😸.
r? compiler
We don't need `NonNull::as_ptr` debuginfo
In order to stop pessimizing the use of local variables in core, skip debug info for MIR temporaries in tiny (single-BB) functions.
For functions as simple as this -- `Pin::new`, etc -- nobody every actually wants debuginfo for them in the first place. They're more like intrinsics than real functions, and stepping over them is good.
Stabilize async closures (RFC 3668)
# Async Closures Stabilization Report
This report proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(async_closure)]` ([RFC 3668](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3668-async-closures.html)). This is a long-awaited feature that increases the expressiveness of the Rust language and fills a pressing gap in the async ecosystem.
## Stabilization summary
* You can write async closures like `async || {}` which return futures that can borrow from their captures and can be higher-ranked in their argument lifetimes.
* You can express trait bounds for these async closures using the `AsyncFn` family of traits, analogous to the `Fn` family.
```rust
async fn takes_an_async_fn(f: impl AsyncFn(&str)) {
futures::join(f("hello"), f("world")).await;
}
takes_an_async_fn(async |s| { other_fn(s).await }).await;
```
## Motivation
Without this feature, users hit two major obstacles when writing async code that uses closures and `Fn` trait bounds:
- The inability to express higher-ranked async function signatures.
- That closures cannot return futures that borrow from the closure captures.
That is, for the first, we cannot write:
```rust
// We cannot express higher-ranked async function signatures.
async fn f<Fut>(_: impl for<'a> Fn(&'a u8) -> Fut)
where
Fut: Future<Output = ()>,
{ todo!() }
async fn main() {
async fn g(_: &u8) { todo!() }
f(g).await;
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
//~| ERROR one type is more general than the other
}
```
And for the second, we cannot write:
```rust
// Closures cannot return futures that borrow closure captures.
async fn f<Fut: Future<Output = ()>>(_: impl FnMut() -> Fut)
{ todo!() }
async fn main() {
let mut xs = vec![];
f(|| async {
async fn g() -> u8 { todo!() }
xs.push(g().await);
});
//~^ ERROR captured variable cannot escape `FnMut` closure body
}
```
Async closures provide a first-class solution to these problems.
For further background, please refer to the [motivation section](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3668-async-closures.html#motivation) of the RFC.
## Major design decisions since RFC
The RFC had left open the question of whether we would spell the bounds syntax for async closures...
```rust
// ...as this...
fn f() -> impl AsyncFn() -> u8 { todo!() }
// ...or as this:
fn f() -> impl async Fn() -> u8 { todo!() }
```
We've decided to spell this as `AsyncFn{,Mut,Once}`.
The `Fn` family of traits is special in many ways. We had originally argued that, due to this specialness, that perhaps the `async Fn` syntax could be adopted without having to decide whether a general `async Trait` mechanism would ever be adopted. However, concerns have been raised that we may not want to use `async Fn` syntax unless we would pursue more general trait modifiers. Since there remain substantial open questions on those -- and we don't want to rush any design work there -- it makes sense to ship this needed feature using the `AsyncFn`-style bounds syntax.
Since we would, in no case, be shipping a generalized trait modifier system anytime soon, we'll be continuing to see `AsyncFoo` traits appear across the ecosystem regardless. If we were to ever later ship some general mechanism, we could at that time manage the migration from `AsyncFn` to `async Fn`, just as we'd be enabling and managing the migration of many other traits.
Note that, as specified in RFC 3668, the details of the `AsyncFn*` traits are not exposed and they can only be named via the "parentheses sugar". That is, we can write `T: AsyncFn() -> u8` but not `T: AsyncFn<Output = u8>`.
Unlike the `Fn` traits, we cannot project to the `Output` associated type of the `AsyncFn` traits. That is, while we can write...
```rust
fn f<F: Fn() -> u8>(_: F::Output) {}
```
...we cannot write:
```rust
fn f<F: AsyncFn() -> u8>(_: F::Output) {}
//~^ ERROR
```
The choice of `AsyncFn{,Mut,Once}` bounds syntax obviates, for our purposes here, another question decided after that RFC, which was how to order bound modifiers such as `for<'a> async Fn()`.
Other than answering the open question in the RFC on syntax, nothing has changed about the design of this feature between RFC 3668 and this stabilization.
## What is stabilized
For those interested in the technical details, please see [the dev guide section](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/coroutine-closures.html) I authored.
#### Async closures
Other than in how they solve the problems described above, async closures act similarly to closures that return async blocks, and can have parts of their signatures specified:
```rust
// They can have arguments annotated with types:
let _ = async |_: u8| { todo!() };
// They can have their return types annotated:
let _ = async || -> u8 { todo!() };
// They can be higher-ranked:
let _ = async |_: &str| { todo!() };
// They can capture values by move:
let x = String::from("hello, world");
let _ = async move || do_something(&x).await };
```
When called, they return an anonymous future type corresponding to the (not-yet-executed) body of the closure. These can be awaited like any other future.
What distinguishes async closures is that, unlike closures that return async blocks, the futures returned from the async closure can capture state from the async closure. For example:
```rust
let vec: Vec<String> = vec![];
let closure = async || {
vec.push(ready(String::from("")).await);
};
```
The async closure captures `vec` with some `&'closure mut Vec<String>` which lives until the closure is dropped. Every call to `closure()` returns a future which reborrows that mutable reference `&'call mut Vec<String>` which lives until the future is dropped (e.g. it is `await`ed).
As another example:
```rust
let string: String = "Hello, world".into();
let closure = async move || {
ready(&string).await;
};
```
The closure is marked with `move`, which means it takes ownership of the string by *value*. The future that is returned by calling `closure()` returns a future which borrows a reference `&'call String` which lives until the future is dropped (e.g. it is `await`ed).
#### Async fn trait family
To support the lending capability of async closures, and to provide a first-class way to express higher-ranked async closures, we introduce the `AsyncFn*` family of traits. See the [corresponding section](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3668-async-closures.html#asyncfn) of the RFC.
We stabilize naming `AsyncFn*` via the "parenthesized sugar" syntax that normal `Fn*` traits can be named. The `AsyncFn*` trait can be used anywhere a `Fn*` trait bound is allowed, such as:
```rust
/// In return-position impl trait:
fn closure() -> impl AsyncFn() { async || {} }
/// In trait bounds:
trait Foo<F>: Sized
where
F: AsyncFn()
{
fn new(f: F) -> Self;
}
/// in GATs:
trait Gat {
type AsyncHasher<T>: AsyncFn(T) -> i32;
}
```
Other than using them in trait bounds, the definitions of these traits are not directly observable, but certain aspects of their behavior can be indirectly observed such as the fact that:
* `AsyncFn::async_call` and `AsyncFnMut::async_call_mut` return a future which is *lending*, and therefore borrows the `&self` lifetime of the callee.
```rust
fn by_ref_call(c: impl AsyncFn()) {
let fut = c();
drop(c);
// ^ Cannot drop `c` since it is borrowed by `fut`.
}
```
* `AsyncFnOnce::async_call_once` returns a future that takes ownership of the callee.
```rust
fn by_ref_call(c: impl AsyncFnOnce()) {
let fut = c();
let _ = c();
// ^ Cannot call `c` since calling it takes ownership the callee.
}
```
* All currently-stable callable types (i.e., closures, function items, function pointers, and `dyn Fn*` trait objects) automatically implement `AsyncFn*() -> T` if they implement `Fn*() -> Fut` for some output type `Fut`, and `Fut` implements `Future<Output = T>`.
* This is to make sure that `AsyncFn*()` trait bounds have maximum compatibility with existing callable types which return futures, such as async function items and closures which return boxed futures.
* For now, this only works currently for *concrete* callable types -- for example, a argument-position impl trait like `impl Fn() -> impl Future<Output = ()>` does not implement `AsyncFn()`, due to the fact that a `AsyncFn`-if-`Fn` blanket impl does not exist in reality. This may be relaxed in the future. Users can work around this by wrapping their type in an async closure and calling it. I expect this to not matter much in practice, as users are encouraged to write `AsyncFn` bounds directly.
```rust
fn is_async_fn(_: impl AsyncFn(&str)) {}
async fn async_fn_item(s: &str) { todo!() }
is_async_fn(s);
// ^^^ This works.
fn generic(f: impl Fn() -> impl Future<Output = ()>) {
is_async_fn(f);
// ^^^ This does not work (yet).
}
```
#### The by-move future
When async closures are called with `AsyncFn`/`AsyncFnMut`, they return a coroutine that borrows from the closure. However, when they are called via `AsyncFnOnce`, we consume that closure, and cannot return a coroutine that borrows from data that is now dropped.
To work around around this limitation, we synthesize a separate future type for calling the async closure via `AsyncFnOnce`.
This future executes identically to the by-ref future returned from calling the async closure, except for the fact that it has a different set of captures, since we must *move* the captures from the parent async into the child future.
#### Interactions between async closures and the `Fn*` family of traits
Async closures always implement `FnOnce`, since they always can be called once. They may also implement `Fn` or `FnMut` if their body is compatible with the calling mode (i.e. if they do not mutate their captures, or they do not capture their captures, respectively) and if the future returned by the async closure is not *lending*.
```rust
let id = String::new();
let mapped: Vec</* impl Future */> =
[/* elements */]
.into_iter()
// `Iterator::map` takes an `impl FnMut`
.map(async |element| {
do_something(&id, element).await;
})
.collect();
```
See [the dev guide](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/coroutine-closures.html#follow-up-when-do-async-closures-implement-the-regular-fn-traits) for a detailed explanation for the situations where this may not be possible due to the lending nature of async closures.
#### Other notable features of async closures shared with synchronous closures
* Async closures are `Copy` and/or `Clone` if their captures are `Copy`/`Clone`.
* Async closures do closure signature inference: If an async closure is passed to a function with a `AsyncFn` or `Fn` trait bound, we can eagerly infer the argument types of the closure. More details are provided in [the dev guide](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/coroutine-closures.html#closure-signature-inference).
#### Lints
This PR also stabilizes the `CLOSURE_RETURNING_ASYNC_BLOCK` lint as an `allow` lint. This lints on "old-style" async closures:
```rust
#![warn(closure_returning_async_block)]
let c = |x: &str| async {};
```
We should encourage users to use `async || {}` where possible. This lint remains `allow` and may be refined in the future because it has a few false positives (namely, see: "Where do we expect rewriting `|| async {}` into `async || {}` to fail?")
An alternative that could be made at the time of stabilization is to put this lint behind another gate, so we can decide to stabilize it later.
## What isn't stabilized (aka, potential future work)
#### `async Fn*()` bound syntax
We decided to stabilize async closures without the `async Fn*()` bound modifier syntax. The general direction of this syntax and how it fits is still being considered by T-lang (e.g. in [RFC 3710](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3710)).
#### Naming the futures returned by async closures
This stabilization PR does not provide a way of naming the futures returned by calling `AsyncFn*`.
Exposing a stable way to refer to these futures is important for building async-closure-aware combinators, and will be an important future step.
#### Return type notation-style bounds for async closures
The RFC described an RTN-like syntax for putting bounds on the future returned by an async closure:
```rust
async fn foo(x: F) -> Result<()>
where
F: AsyncFn(&str) -> Result<()>,
// The future from calling `F` is `Send` and `'static`.
F(..): Send + 'static,
{}
```
This stabilization PR does not stabilize that syntax yet, which remains unimplemented (though will be soon).
#### `dyn AsyncFn*()`
`AsyncFn*` are not dyn-compatible yet. This will likely be implemented in the future along with the dyn-compatibility of async fn in trait, since the same issue (dealing with the future returned by a call) applies there.
## Tests
Tests exist for this feature in [`tests/ui/async-await/async-closures`](5b54286640/tests/ui/async-await/async-closures).
<details>
<summary>A selected set of tests:</summary>
* Lending behavior of async closures
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/mutate.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/captures.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/precise-captures.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/no-borrow-from-env.rs`
* Async closures may be higher-ranked
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/higher-ranked.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/higher-ranked-return.rs`
* Async closures may implement `Fn*` traits
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/is-fn.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/implements-fnmut.rs`
* Async closures may be cloned
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/clone-closure.rs`
* Ownership of the upvars when `AsyncFnOnce` is called
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/drop.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/move-is-async-fn.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/force-move-due-to-inferred-kind.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/force-move-due-to-actually-fnonce.rs`
* Closure signature inference
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/signature-deduction.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/sig-from-bare-fn.rs`
* `tests/ui/async-await/async-closures/signature-inference-from-two-part-bound.rs`
</details>
## Remaining bugs and open issues
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120694 tracks moving onto more general `LendingFn*` traits. No action needed, since it's not observable.
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124020 - Polymorphization ICE. Polymorphization needs to be heavily reworked. No action needed.
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127227 - Tracking reworking the way that rustdoc re-sugars bounds.
* The part relevant to to `AsyncFn` is fixed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132697.
## Where do we expect rewriting `|| async {}` into `async || {}` to fail?
* Fn pointer coercions
* Currently, it is not possible to coerce an async closure to an fn pointer like regular closures can be. This functionality may be implemented in the future.
```rust
let x: fn() -> _ = async || {};
```
* Argument capture
* Like async functions, async closures always capture their input arguments. This is in contrast to something like `|t: T| async {}`, which doesn't capture `t` unless it is used in the async block. This may affect the `Send`-ness of the future or affect its outlives.
```rust
fn needs_send_future(_: impl Fn(NotSendArg) -> Fut)
where
Fut: Future<Output = ()>,
{}
needs_send_future(async |_| {});
```
## History
#### Important feature history
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51580
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62292
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120361
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120712
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121857
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123660
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125259
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128506
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127482
## Acknowledgements
Thanks to `@oli-obk` for reviewing the bulk of the work for this feature. Thanks to `@nikomatsakis` for his design blog posts which generated interest for this feature, `@traviscross` for feedback and additions to this stabilization report. All errors are my own.
r? `@ghost`
Arbitrary self types v2: main compiler changes
This is the main PR in a series of PRs related to Arbitrary Self Types v2, tracked in #44874. Specifically this is step 7 of the plan [described here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874#issuecomment-2122179688), for [RFC 3519](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519).
Overall this PR:
* Switches from the `Deref` trait to the new `Receiver` trait when the unstable `arbitrary_self_types` feature is enabled (the simple bit)
* Introduces new algorithms to spot "shadowing"; that is, the case where a newly-added method in an outer smart pointer might end up overriding a pre-existing method in the pointee (the complex bit). Most of this bit was explored in [this earlier perf-testing PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127812#issuecomment-2236911900).
* Lots of tests
This should not break compatibility for:
* Stable users, where it should have no effect
* Users of the existing `arbitrary_self_types` feature (because we implement `Receiver` for `T: Deref`) _unless_ those folks have added methods which may shadow methods in inner types, which we no longer want to allow
Subsequent PRs will add better diagnostics.
It's probably easiest to review this commit-by-commit.
r? `@wesleywiser`
Add unpolished, experimental support for AFIDT (async fn in dyn trait)
This allows us to begin messing around `async fn` in `dyn Trait`. Calling an async fn from a trait object always returns a `dyn* Future<Output = ...>`.
To make it work, Implementations are currently required to return something that can be coerced to a `dyn* Future` (see the example in `tests/ui/async-await/dyn/works.rs`). If it's not the right size, then it'll raise an error at the coercion site (see the example in `tests/ui/async-await/dyn/wrong-size.rs`). Currently the only practical way of doing this is wrapping the body in `Box::pin(async move { .. })`.
This PR does not implement a helper type like a "`Boxing`"[^boxing] adapter, and I'll probably follow-up with another PR to improve the error message for the `PointerLike` trait (something that explains in just normal prose what is happening here, rather than a trait error).
[^boxing]: https://rust-lang.github.io/async-fundamentals-initiative/explainer/user_guide_future.html#the-boxing-adapter
This PR also does not implement new trait solver support for AFIDT; I'll need to think how best to integrate it into candidate assembly, and that's a bit of a matter of taste, but I don't think it will be difficult to do.
This could also be generalized:
* To work on functions that are `-> impl Future` (soon).
* To work on functions that are `-> impl Iterator` and other "dyn rpitit safe" traits. We still need to nail down exactly what is needed for this to be okay (not soon).
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133119
suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method
Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without `()`
r? estebank
Fixes#67680
Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.
Some asm! diagnostic adjustments and a papercut fix
Best reviewed commit by commit.
We forgot a `normalize` call in intrinsic checking, causing us to allow literal integers, but not named constants containing that literal. This can in theory affect stable code, but only if libstd contains a stable SIMD type that has an array length that is a named constant. I'd assume we'd have noticed by now due to asm! rejecting those outright.
The error message left me scratching my head for a bit, so I added some extra information to the diagnostic, too.
Pass end position of span through inline ASM cookie
Before this PR, only the start position of the span was passed though the inline ASM cookie to diagnostics. LLVM 19 has full support for 64-bit inline ASM cookies; this PR uses that to pass the end position of the span in the upper 32 bits, meaning inline ASM diagnostics now point at the entire line the error occurred on, not just the first character of it.
codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957Fixes#124375
This implements the approach suggested in the tracking issue: use the existing global assembly infrastructure to emit the body of `#[naked]` functions. The main advantage is that we now have full control over what gets generated, and are no longer dependent on LLVM not sneakily messing with our output (inlining, adding extra instructions, etc).
I discussed this approach with `@Amanieu` and while I think the general direction is correct, there is probably a bunch of stuff that needs to change or move around here. I'll leave some inline comments on things that I'm not sure about.
Combined with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127853, if both accepted, I think that resolves all steps from the tracking issue.
r? `@Amanieu`
coverage: Rearrange the code for embedding per-function coverage metadata
This is a series of refactorings to the code that prepares and embeds per-function coverage metadata records (“covfun records”) in the `__llvm_covfun` linker section of the final binary. The `llvm-cov` tool reads this metadata from the binary when preparing a coverage report.
Beyond general cleanup, a big motivation behind these changes is to pave the way for re-landing an updated version of #133418.
---
There should be no change in compiler output, as demonstrated by the absence of (meaningful) changes to coverage tests.
The first patch is just moving code around, so I suggest looking at the other patches to see the actual changes.
---
try-job: x86_64-gnu
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: aarch64-apple
There's some discussion on the RFC about whether generic receivers should be
allowed, but in the end the conclusion was that they should be blocked
(at least for some definition of 'generic'). This blocking landed in
an earlier PR; this commit adds additional tests to ensure the
interaction with the rest of the Arbitrary Self Types v2 feature is as
expected. This test may be a little duplicative but it seems better
to land it than not.
In this new version of Arbitrary Self Types, we no longer use the Deref trait
exclusively when working out which self types are valid. Instead, we follow a
chain of Receiver traits. This enables methods to be called on smart pointer
types which fundamentally cannot support Deref (for instance because they are
wrappers for pointers that don't follow Rust's aliasing rules).
This includes:
* Changes to tests appropriately
* New tests for:
* The basics of the feature
* Ensuring lifetime elision works properly
* Generic Receivers
* A copy of the method subst test enhanced with Receiver
This is really the heart of the 'arbitrary self types v2' feature, and
is the most critical commit in the current PR.
Subsequent commits are focused on:
* Detecting "shadowing" problems, where a smart pointer type can hide
methods in the pointee.
* Diagnostics and cleanup.
Naming: in this commit, the "Autoderef" type is modified so that it no
longer solely focuses on the "Deref" trait, but can now consider the
"Receiver" trait instead. Should it be renamed, to something like
"TraitFollower"? This was considered, but rejected, because
* even in the Receiver case, it still considers built-in derefs
* the name Autoderef is short and snappy.
Rudimentary heuristic to insert parentheses when needed for RPIT overcaptures lint
We don't have basically any preexisting machinery to detect when parentheses are needed for *types*. AFAICT, all of the diagnostics we have for opaques just... fail when they suggest `+ 'a` when that's ambiguous.
Fixes#132853
Exercise const trait interaction with default fields
Add a test case for using the result of a fn call of an associated function of a `const` trait in a struct default field.
```rust
struct X;
trait Trait {
fn value() -> Self;
}
impl const Trait for X {
fn value() -> Self { X }
}
struct S<T: const Trait> {
a: T = T::value(),
}
```
Validate self in host predicates correctly
`assert_only_contains_predicates_from` was added to make sure that we are computing predicates for the correct self type for a given `PredicateFilter`. That was not implemented correctly for `PredicateFilter::SelfOnly` when there are const predicates.
Fixes#133526
we get these declarations
```
; opt level 0
declare x86_intrcc void @page_fault_handler(ptr byval([8 x i8]) align 8, i64) unnamed_addr #1
; opt level > 0
declare x86_intrcc void @page_fault_handler(ptr noalias nocapture noundef byval([8 x i8]) align 8 dereferenceable(8), i64 noundef) unnamed_addr #1
```
The space after `i64` in the original regex made the regex not match for
opt level 0. Removing the space fixes the issue.
```
declare x86_intrcc void @page_fault_handler(ptr {{.*}}, i64 {{.*}}){{.*}}#[[ATTRS:[0-9]+]]
```
Add the `power8-crypto` target feature
Add the `power8-crypto` target feature. This will enable adding some new PPC intrinsics in stdarch (specifically AES, SHA and CLMUL intrinsics). The implied target feature is from [here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPC.td)
```@rustbot``` label A-target-feature O-PowerPC
When we expand a `mod foo;` and parse `foo.rs`, we now track whether that file had an unrecovered parse error that reached the end of the file. If so, we keep that information around. When resolving a path like `foo::bar`, we do not emit any errors for "`bar` not found in `foo`", as we know that the parse error might have caused `bar` to not be parsed and accounted for.
When this happens in an existing project, every path referencing `foo` would be an irrelevant compile error. Instead, we now skip emitting anything until `foo.rs` is fixed. Tellingly enough, we didn't have any test for errors caused by `mod` expansion.
Fix#97734.
Add a test case for using the result of a fn call of an associated
function of a `const` trait in a struct default field.
```rust
struct X;
trait Trait {
fn value() -> Self;
}
impl const Trait for X {
fn value() -> Self { X }
}
struct S<T: const Trait> {
a: T = T::value(),
}
```
