Initialize a few variables directly
Currently they are declared as `mut`, get initialized to a default value, and
then possibly overwritten.
By initializing to the final value directly, they don't need to be `mut` and
it's clear that they don't get mutated elsewhere later on.
Use PlaceRef projection abstractions more consistently in rustc_mir
PlaceRef contains abstractions for dealing with the `projections` array. This PR uses these abstractions more consistently within the `rustc_mir` crate.
See associated issue: rust-lang/rust#80647.
r? `@RalfJung`
Don't use posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np on macOS.
There is a bug on macOS where using `posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np` with a relative executable path will cause `posix_spawnp` to return ENOENT, even though it successfully spawned the process in the given directory.
`posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np` was introduced in macOS 10.15 first released in Oct 2019. I have tested macOS 10.15.7 and 11.0.1.
Example offending program:
```rust
use std::fs;
use std::os::unix::fs::PermissionsExt;
use std::process::*;
fn main() {
fs::create_dir_all("bar").unwrap();
fs::create_dir_all("foo").unwrap();
fs::write("foo/foo.sh", "#!/bin/sh\necho hello ${PWD}\n").unwrap();
let perms = fs::Permissions::from_mode(0o755);
fs::set_permissions("foo/foo.sh", perms).unwrap();
let c = Command::new("../foo/foo.sh").current_dir("bar").spawn();
eprintln!("{:?}", c);
}
```
This prints:
```
Err(Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" })
hello /Users/eric/Temp/bar
```
I wanted to open this PR to get some feedback on possible solutions. Alternatives:
* Do nothing.
* Document the bug.
* Try to detect if the executable is a relative path on macOS, and avoid using `posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np` only in that case.
I looked at the [XNU source code](https://opensource.apple.com/source/xnu/xnu-6153.141.1/bsd/kern/kern_exec.c.auto.html), but I didn't see anything obvious that would explain the behavior. The actual chdir succeeds, it is something else further down that fails, but I couldn't see where.
EDIT: I forgot to mention, relative exe paths with `current_dir` in general are discouraged (see #37868). I don't know if #37868 is fixable, since normalizing it would change the semantics for some platforms. Another option is to convert the executable to an absolute path with something like joining the cwd with the new cwd and the executable, but I'm uncertain about that.
- Don't add backticks for the reason a lint was removed. This is almost
never a code block, and when it is the backticks should be in the reason
itself.
- Don't assume clippy is the only tool that needs to be checked for
backwards compatibility
Don't make tools responsible for checking unknown and renamed lints
Previously, clippy (and any other tool emitting lints) had to have their
own separate UNKNOWN_LINTS pass, because the compiler assumed any tool
lint could be valid. Now, as long as any lint starting with the tool
prefix exists, the compiler will warn when an unknown lint is present.
This may interact with the unstable `tool_lint` feature, which I don't entirely understand, but it will take the burden off those external tools to add their own lint pass, which seems like a step in the right direction to me.
- Don't mark `ineffective_unstable_trait_impl` as an internal lint
- Use clippy's more advanced lint suggestions
- Deprecate the `UNKNOWN_CLIPPY_LINTS` pass (and make it a no-op)
- Say 'unknown lint `clippy::x`' instead of 'unknown lint x'
This is tested by existing clippy tests. When https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80527 merges, it will also be tested in rustdoc tests. AFAIK there is no way to test this with rustc directly.
Before:
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempt to read from stolen value', /home/joshua/rustc/compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/steal.rs:43:15
```
After:
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'attempt to steal from stolen value', compiler/rustc_mir/src/transform/mod.rs:423:25
```
Add NonZeroUn::is_power_of_two
This saves instructions on both new and old machines <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/4fjTMz>
- On the default x64 target (with no fancy instructions available) it saves a few instructions by not needing to also check for zero.
- On newer targets (with BMI1) it uses `BLSR` for super-short assembly.
This can be used for things like checks against alignments stored in `NonZeroUsize`.
Use Option::unwrap_or instead of open-coding it
r? ```@oli-obk``` Noticed this while we were talking about the other PR just now 😆
```@rustbot``` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
Force vec![] to expression position only
r? `@oli-obk`
I went with the lazy way of only changing what broke. I moved the test to ui/macros because the diagnostics no longer give suggestions.
Closes#61933
Support non-stage0 check
Seems to work locally - a full stage 1 check succeeds, building std (because we can't get away with checking it), and then checking the compiler and other tools. This ran into the problem that a unconditional x.py check in stage 1 *both* checks and builds stage 1 std, and then has to clean up because for some reason the rmeta and rlib artifacts conflict (though I'm not actually entirely sure why, but it doesn't seem worth digging in in too much detail).
Ideally we wouldn't be building and checking like that but it's a minor worry as checking std is pretty fast and you can avoid it if you're aiming for speed by passing the compiler (e.g., compiler/rustc) explicitly.
r? ```@jyn514```
