borrowck: prepopulate opaque storage more eagerly
otherwise we ICE due to ambiguity when normalizing while computing implied bounds.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Record impl args in the proof tree in new solver
Rather than rematching them during select.
Also use `ImplSource::Param` instead of `ImplSource::Builtin` for alias-bound candidates, so we don't ICE in `Instance::resolve`.
r? lcnr
Don't consider candidates with no failing where clauses when refining obligation causes in new solver
Improves error messages when we have param-env candidates that don't deeply unify (i.e. after alias-bounds).
r? lcnr
Prefer lower vtable candidates in select in new solver
Also, adjust the select visitor to only winnow when the *parent* goal is `Certainty::Yes`. This means that we won't winnow in cases when we have any ambiguous inference guidance from two candidates.
r? lcnr
Implement `do_not_recommend` in the new solver
Put the test into `diagnostic_namespace` test folder even though it's not in the diagnostic namespace, because it should be soon.
r? lcnr
cc `@weiznich`
Use a proof tree visitor to refine the `Obligation` for error reporting in new solver
With the magic of `ProofTreeVisitor`, we can close the gap that we have on `ObligationCause`s being not as descriptive in the new trait solver.
r? lcnr
Needs some work and obviously documentation.
Use `tcx.types.unit` instead of `Ty::new_unit(tcx)`
I don't think there is any need for the function, given that we can just access the `.types`, similarly to all other primitives?
Rewrite select (in the new solver) to use a `ProofTreeVisitor`
We can use a proof tree visitor rather than collecting and recomputing all the nested goals ourselves.
Based on #124415
Cleanup: Replace item names referencing GitHub issues or error codes with something more meaningful
**lcnr** in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117164#pullrequestreview-1969935387:
> […] while I know that there's precendent to name things `Issue69420`, I really dislike this as it requires looking up the issue to figure out the purpose of such a variant. Actually referring to the underlying issue, e.g. `AliasMayNormToUncovered` or whatever and then linking to the issue in a doc comment feels a lot more desirable to me. We should ideally rename all the functions and enums which currently use issue numbers.
I've grepped through `compiler/` like crazy and think that I've found all instances of this pattern.
However, I haven't renamed `compute_2229_migrations_*`. Should I?
The first commit introduces an abhorrent and super long name for an item because naming is hard but also scary looking / unwelcoming names are good for things related to temporary-ish backcompat hacks. I'll let you discover it by yourself.
Contains a bit of drive-by cleanup and a diag migration bc that was the simplest option.
r? lcnr or compiler
Lazily normalize inside trait ref during orphan check & consider ty params in rigid alias types to be uncovered
Fixes#99554, fixesrust-lang/types-team#104.
Fixes#114061.
Supersedes #100555.
Tracking issue for the future compatibility lint: #124559.
r? lcnr
Remove many `#[macro_use] extern crate foo` items
This requires the addition of more `use` items, which often make the code more verbose. But they also make the code easier to read, because `#[macro_use]` obscures where macros are defined.
r? `@fee1-dead`
`obligations_for_self_ty`: use `ProofTreeVisitor` for nested goals
As always, dealing with proof trees continues to be a hacked together mess. After this PR and #124380 the only remaining blocker for core is https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/90. There is also a `ProofTreeVisitor` issue causing an ICE when compiling `alloc` which I will handle in a separate PR. This issue likely affects coherence diagnostics more generally.
The core idea is to extend the proof tree visitor to support visiting nested candidates without using a `probe`. We then simply recurse into nested candidates if they are the only potentially applicable candidate for a given goal and check whether the self type matches the expected one.
For that to work, we need to improve `CanonicalState` to also handle unconstrained inference variables created inside of the trait solver. This is done by extending the `var_values` of `CanoncalState` with each fresh inference variables. Furthermore, we also store the state of all inference variables at the end of each probe. When recursing into `InspectCandidates` we then unify the values of all these states.
r? `@compiler-errors`
