Merge impl_trait_in_assoc_types_defined_by query back into `opaque_types_defined_by`
Instead, when we're collecting opaques for associated items, we choose the right collection mode depending on whether we're collecting for an associated item of a trait impl or not.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121838
Fix duplicated path in the "not found dylib" error
While working on the gcc backend, I couldn't figure out why I had this error:
```
error: couldn't load codegen backend /checkout/compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/target/release/librustc_codegen_gcc.so/checkout/compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/target/release/librustc_codegen_gcc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
```
As you can see, the path is duplicated for some reason. After investigating a bit more, I realized that `libloading::Error::LoadLibraryExW` starts with the path of the not found dylib, making it appear twice in our error afterward (because we do render it like this: `{path}{err}`, and since the `err` starts with the path...).
Thanks to `````@bjorn3````` for linking me to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121392. :)
hir_analysis: enums return `None` in `find_field`
Fixes#121757.
Unnamed union fields with enums are checked for, but if `find_field` causes an ICE then the compiler won't get to that point.
Limit the number of names and values in check-cfg diagnostics
The Rust for Linux [feedback](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82450#issuecomment-1947462977) to the check-cfg Call for Testing, revealed a weakness in the check-cfg. They are unbounded and in the case RfL they have ~20k cfgs and having them printed (even once) is unbearable.
This PR limits it to 35 (28 rustc well known + `feature` + `docsrs` + 5 custom) which feels like a good middle ground for regular users (i.e. Cargo users).
When it goes over that limit print the N first with " and X more".
``@rustbot`` label +F-check-cfg
Instead, when we're collecting opaques for associated items, we choose the right collection mode depending on whether we're collecting for an associated item of a trait impl or not.
tidy: split dots in filename not the entire path when checking for stray stdout/stderr files
I committed a path crime by splitting the entire path on `.`, when I meant to split on the filename. This means that any parent folders which contain `.` will cause tidy failure. Added a regression test so that doesn't happen again.
### Follow-up
- [ ] Adjust rustc-dev-guide to document assert on test name not containing dots. https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1927Fixes#121986.
Use the correct logic for nested impl trait in assoc types
Previously we accidentally continued with the TAIT visitor, which allowed more than we wanted to.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Use root obligation on E0277 for some cases
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about `T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in `tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs to change), cc #121398 (doesn't fix the underlying issue).
Adjust error `yield`/`await` lowering
Adjust the lowering of `yield`/`await` outside of their correct scopes so that we no longer make orpan HIR exprs.
Previously, `yield EXPR` would be lowered directly to `hir::TyKind::Error` (which I'll call `<error>`) which means that `EXPR` was not present in the HIR, but now we lower it to `{ EXPR; <error> }` so that `EXPR` is not orphaned.
Fixes#121096
When you make a change to the diagnostic lints, it uses the old version
of the lints with stage 1 and the new version with stage 2, which often
leads to failures in stage 1. Let's just stick to stage 2.
Add a scheme for moving away from `extern "rust-intrinsic"` entirely
All `rust-intrinsic`s can become free functions now, either with a fallback body, or with a dummy body and an attribute, requiring backends to actually implement the intrinsic.
This PR demonstrates the dummy-body scheme with the `vtable_size` intrinsic.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63585
follow-up to #120500
MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/720
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120976 (constify a couple thread_local statics)
- #121683 (Fix LVI tests after frame pointers are enabled by default)
- #121703 (Add a way to add constructors for `rustc_type_ir` types)
- #121732 (Improve assert_matches! documentation)
- #121928 (Extract an arguments struct for `Builder::then_else_break`)
- #121939 (Small enhancement to description of From trait)
- #121968 (Don't run test_get_os_named_thread on win7)
- #121969 (`ParseSess` cleanups)
- #121977 (Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr.)
- #121994 (Update platform-support.md with supported musl version)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix LVI tests after frame pointers are enabled by default
#121203 enables frame pointers by default. This affects LVI mitigations for the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` target. LVI remained mitigated correctly, but the tests were too strict.
``@nshyrei`` , ``@jethrogb``
Existing names for values of this type are `sess`, `parse_sess`,
`parse_session`, and `ps`. `sess` is particularly annoying because
that's also used for `Session` values, which are often co-located, and
it can be difficult to know which type a value named `sess` refers to.
(That annoyance is the main motivation for this change.) `psess` is nice
and short, which is good for a name used this much.
The commit also renames some `parse_sess_created` values as
`psess_created`.
Add a new `wasm32-wasip1` target to rustc
This commit adds a new target called `wasm32-wasip1` to rustc. This new target is explained in these two MCPs:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/607
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/695
In short, the previous `wasm32-wasi` target is going to be renamed to `wasm32-wasip1` to better live alongside the [new `wasm32-wasip2` target](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119616). This new target is added alongside the `wasm32-wasi` target and has the exact same definition as the previous target. This PR is effectively a rename of `wasm32-wasi` to `wasm32-wasip1`. Note, however, that as explained in rust-lang/compiler-team#695 the previous `wasm32-wasi` target is not being removed at this time. This change will reach stable Rust before even a warning about the rename will be printed. At this time this change is just the start where a new target is introduced and users can start migrating if they support only Nightly for example.
Unnamed union fields with enums are checked for, but if `find_field`
causes an ICE then the compiler won't get to that point.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #121130 (Suggest moving definition if non-found macro_rules! is defined later)
- #121912 (Properly deal with GATs when looking for method chains to point at)
- #121927 (Add a proper `with_no_queries` to printing)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Properly deal with GATs when looking for method chains to point at
Fixes#121898.
~~While it prevents an ICE and the structured suggestion is correct, the method chain diagnostic notes are weird / useless / incorrect judging by a quick look. I guess I should improve that in this PR.~~ Sufficiently taken care of.
r? estebank or compiler-errors (#105332, #105674).
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #121248 (Move some tests)
- #121528 (Consider middle segments of paths in `unused_qualifications`)
- #121749 (Don't lint on executable crates with `non_snake_case` names)
- #121935 (library/ptr: mention that ptr::without_provenance is equivalent to deriving from the null ptr)
- #121945 (Run some ui-fulldeps tests on stage 1 again)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Run some ui-fulldeps tests on stage 1 again
This is the second time I'm doing this... I'm starting to feel like stage1 ui-fulldeps tests were a mistake. Maybe I should have just put `#[cfg(bootstrap)]` there to let the bootstrap bumper fix it.
`@George-lewis` :)
finishes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119088#issuecomment-1890389583
Consider middle segments of paths in `unused_qualifications`
Currently `unused_qualifications` looks at the last segment of a path to see if it can be trimmed, this PR extends the check to the middle segments also
```rust
// currently linted
use std::env::args();
std::env::args(); // Removes `std::env::`
```
```rust
// newly linted
use std::env;
std::env::args(); // Removes `std::`
```
Paths with generics in them are now linted as long as the part being trimmed is before any generic args, e.g. it will now suggest trimming `std::vec::` from `std::vec::Vec<usize>`
Paths with any segments that are from an expansion are no longer linted
Fixes#100979Fixes#96698
```
error[E0599]: no method named `map` found for struct `Vec<bool>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/vec-on-unimplemented.rs:3:23
|
LL | vec![true, false].map(|v| !v).collect::<Vec<_>>();
| ^^^ `Vec<bool>` is not an iterator
|
help: call `.into_iter()` first
|
LL | vec![true, false].into_iter().map(|v| !v).collect::<Vec<_>>();
| ++++++++++++
```
We used to provide some help through `rustc_on_unimplemented` on non-`impl Trait` and non-type-params, but this lets us get rid of some otherwise unnecessary conditions in the annotation on `Iterator`.
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that
tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root
obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for
the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the
most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't
implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type
from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid
talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about
`T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in
`tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs
to change).
This is the second time I'm doing this... I'm starting to feel like
stage1 ui-fulldeps tests were a mistake. Maybe I should have just put
`#[cfg(bootstrap)]` there to let the bootstrap bumper fix it.
