Add slice::try_range
This adds a fallible version of the unstable `slice::range` (tracking: #76393) which is highly requested in the tracking issue.
Hoping this can slide by without an ACP (since the feature is already being tracked), but let me know otherwise.
Vec::try_with_capacity
Related to #91913
Implements try_with_capacity for `Vec`, `VecDeque`, and `String`. I can follow it up with more collections if desired.
`Vec::try_with_capacity()` is functionally equivalent to the current stable:
```rust
let mut v = Vec::new();
v.try_reserve_exact(n)?
```
However, `try_reserve` calls non-inlined `finish_grow`, which requires old and new `Layout`, and is designed to reallocate memory. There is benefit to using `try_with_capacity`, besides syntax convenience, because it generates much smaller code at the call site with a direct call to the allocator. There's codegen test included.
It's also a very desirable functionality for users of `no_global_oom_handling` (Rust-for-Linux), since it makes a very commonly used function available in that environment (`with_capacity` is used much more frequently than all `(try_)reserve(_exact)`).
Add `#[inline]` to `BTreeMap::new` constructor
This PR add the `#[inline]` attribute to `BTreeMap::new` constructor as to make it eligible for inlining.
<details>
For some context: I was profiling `rustc --check-cfg` with callgrind and due to the way we currently setup all the targets and we end-up calling `BTreeMap::new` multiple times for (nearly) all the targets. Adding the `#[inline]` attribute reduced the number of instructions needed.
</details>
only set noalias on Box with the global allocator
As discovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3341, `noalias` and custom allocators don't go well together.
rustc can now check whether a Box uses the global allocator. This replaces the previous ad-hoc and rather unprincipled check for a zero-sized allocator.
This is the rustc part of fixing that; Miri will also need a patch.
const_eval_select: make it safe but be careful with what we expose on stable for now
As this is all still nightly-only I think `````@rust-lang/wg-const-eval````` can do that without involving t-lang.
r? `````@oli-obk`````
Cc `````@Nilstrieb````` -- the updated version of your RFC would basically say that we can remove these comments about not making behavior differences visible in stable `const fn`
Clarify/add `must_use` message for Rc/Arc/Weak::into_raw.
The current `#[must_use]` messages for `{sync,rc}::Weak::into_raw` ("`self` will be dropped if the result is not used") are misleading, as `self` is consumed and will *not* be dropped.
This PR changes their `#[must_use]` message to the same as `Arc::into_raw`'s[ current `#[must_use]` message](d573564575/library/alloc/src/sync.rs (L1482)) ("losing the pointer will leak memory"), and also adds it to `Rc::into_raw`, which is not currently `#[must_use]`.
Preserve same vtable pointer when cloning raw waker, to fix Waker::will_wake
Fixes#121600.
As `@jkarneges` identified in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121600#issuecomment-1963041051, the issue is two different const promotions produce two statics at different addresses, which may or may not later be deduplicated by the linker (in this case not).
Prior to #119863, the content of the statics was compared, and they were equal. After, the address of the statics are compared and they are not equal.
It is documented that `will_wake` _"works on a best-effort basis, and may return false even when the Wakers would awaken the same task"_ so this PR fixes a quality-of-implementation issue, not a correctness issue.
Have `String` use `SliceIndex` impls from `str`
This PR simplifies the implementation of `Index` and `IndexMut` on `String`, and in the process enables indexing `String` by any user types that implement `SliceIndex<str>`.
Similar to #47832
r? libs
Not sure if this warrants a crater run.
Those libraries are build with `-C panic=unwind` and is expected to
be linkable to `-C panic=abort` library. To ensure unsoundness
compiler needs to prevent a `C-unwind` call to exist, as doing so may leak
foreign exceptions into `-C panic=abort`.
Help with common API confusion, like asking for `push` when the data structure really has `append`.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `size` found for struct `Vec<{integer}>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs:17:7
|
LL | x.size();
| ^^^^
|
help: you might have meant to use `len`
|
LL | x.len();
| ~~~
help: there is a method with a similar name
|
LL | x.resize();
| ~~~~~~
```
#59450
Remove useless `'static` bounds on `Box` allocator
#79327 added `'static` bounds to the allocator parameter for various `Box` + `Pin` APIs to ensure soundness. But it was a bit overzealous, some of the bounds aren't actually needed.
Remove unnecessary unit binding
It appears that the unit binding is not necessary at this time. However, I am unsure of its importance in the past. Please let me know if it is unsafe to remove.
