Improve diagnostic by suggesting to remove visibility qualifier
Resolves#123529
This PR improve diagnostic by suggesting to remove visibility qualifier.
Fix invalid silencing of parsing error
Given
```rust
macro_rules! a {
( ) => {
impl<'b> c for d {
e::<f'g>
}
};
}
```
ensure an error is emitted.
Fix#123079.
While they're isomorphic, we can flip the lld component where
applicable, so that downstream doesn't have to check both the flavor and
the linker features.
They are a flexible complementary mechanism to linker flavors,
that also avoid the combinatorial explosion of mapping linking features
to actual linker flavors.
Don't delay a bug if we suggest adding a semicolon to the RHS of an assign operator
It only makes sense to delay a bug based on the assumption that "[we] defer to the later error produced by `check_lhs_assignable`" *if* the expression we're erroring actually is an LHS; otherwise, we should still report the error since it's both useful and required.
Fixes#123722
Make `PlaceRef` and `OperandValue::Ref` share a common `PlaceValue` type
Both `PlaceRef` and `OperandValue::Ref` need the triple of the backend pointer immediate, the optional backend metadata for DSTs, and the actual alignment of the place (since it can differ from the ABI alignment).
This PR introduces a new `PlaceValue` type for those three values, leaving [`PlaceRef`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_codegen_ssa/mir/place/struct.PlaceRef.html) with the `TyAndLayout` and a `PlaceValue`, just like how [`OperandRef`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_codegen_ssa/mir/operand/struct.OperandRef.html) is a `TyAndLayout` and an `OperandValue`.
This means that various places that use `Ref`s as places can just pass the `PlaceValue` along, like in the below excerpt from the diff:
```diff
match operand.val {
- OperandValue::Ref(ptr, meta, align) => {
- debug_assert_eq!(meta, None);
+ OperandValue::Ref(source_place_val) => {
+ debug_assert_eq!(source_place_val.llextra, None);
debug_assert!(matches!(operand_kind, OperandValueKind::Ref));
- let fake_place = PlaceRef::new_sized_aligned(ptr, cast, align);
+ let fake_place = PlaceRef { val: source_place_val, layout: cast };
Some(bx.load_operand(fake_place).val)
}
```
There's more refactoring that I'd like to do after this, but I wanted to stop the PR here where it's hopefully easy (albeit probably not quick) to review since I tried to keep every change line-by-line clear. (Most are just adding `.val` to get to a field.)
You can also go commit-at-a-time if you'd like. Each passed tidy and the codegen tests on my machine (though I didn't run the cg_gcc ones).
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #122882 (Avoid a panic in `set_output_capture` in the default panic handler)
- #123523 (Account for trait/impl difference when suggesting changing argument from ref to mut ref)
- #123744 (Silence `unused_imports` for redundant imports)
- #123784 (Replace `document.write` with `document.head.insertAdjacent`)
- #123798 (Avoid invalid socket address in length calculation)
- #123804 (Stop using `HirId` for fn-like parents since closures are not `OwnerNode`s)
- #123806 (Panic on overflow in `BorrowedCursor::advance`)
- #123820 (Add my former address to .mailmap)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Stop using `HirId` for fn-like parents since closures are not `OwnerNode`s
This is a minimal fix for #123273.
I'm overall pretty disappointed w/ the state of this code; although it's "just diagnostics", it still should be maintainable and understandable and neither of those are true. I believe this code really needs some major overhauling before anything more should be added to it, because there are subtle invariants that are being exercised and subsequently broken all over the place, and I don't think we should just paper over them (e.g.) by delaying bugs or things like that. I wouldn't be surprised if fixing up this code would also yield better diagnostics.
Silence `unused_imports` for redundant imports
Quick fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121708#issuecomment-2048105393
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@joshtriplett`
I think this is right, would like confirmation. I also think it's weird that we're using `=` to assign to `is_redundant` but using `per_ns` for the actual spans. Seems like this could be weirdly order dependent, but that's unrelated to this change.
Account for trait/impl difference when suggesting changing argument from ref to mut ref
Do not ICE when encountering a lifetime error involving an argument with an immutable reference of a method that differs from the trait definition.
Fix#123414.
Deduplicate some function implementations between the parser and AST/HIR
These functions already existed on parser binops, so just convert back to them back and invoke the equivalent method.
Reduce Size of `ModifierInfo`
I added `ModifierInfo` in #121940 and had used a `u64` for the `size` field even though the largest value it holds is `512`.
This PR changes the type of the `size` field to `u16`.
We attempt to suggest an appropriate clone for move errors on expressions
like `S { ..s }` where a field isn't `Copy`. If we can't suggest, we still don't
emit the incorrect suggestion of `S { ..s }.clone()`.
```
error[E0509]: cannot move out of type `S<K>`, which implements the `Drop` trait
--> $DIR/borrowck-struct-update-with-dtor.rs:28:19
|
LL | let _s2 = S { a: 2, ..s0 };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| cannot move out of here
| move occurs because `s0.c` has type `K`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
help: clone the value from the field instead of using the spread operator syntax
|
LL | let _s2 = S { a: 2, c: s0.c.clone(), ..s0 };
| +++++++++++++++++
```
```
error[E0509]: cannot move out of type `S<()>`, which implements the `Drop` trait
--> $DIR/borrowck-struct-update-with-dtor.rs:20:19
|
LL | let _s2 = S { a: 2, ..s0 };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| cannot move out of here
| move occurs because `s0.b` has type `B`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `B` doesn't implement `Copy` or `Clone`
--> $DIR/borrowck-struct-update-with-dtor.rs:4:1
|
LL | struct B;
| ^^^^^^^^
help: if `B` implemented `Clone`, you could clone the value from the field instead of using the spread operator syntax
|
LL | let _s2 = S { a: 2, b: s0.b.clone(), ..s0 };
| +++++++++++++++++
```
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `blk`
--> $DIR/once-cant-call-twice-on-heap.rs:8:5
|
LL | fn foo<F:FnOnce()>(blk: F) {
| --- move occurs because `blk` has type `F`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
LL | blk();
| ----- `blk` moved due to this call
LL | blk();
| ^^^ value used here after move
|
note: `FnOnce` closures can only be called once
--> $DIR/once-cant-call-twice-on-heap.rs:6:10
|
LL | fn foo<F:FnOnce()>(blk: F) {
| ^^^^^^^^ `F` is made to be an `FnOnce` closure here
LL | blk();
| ----- this value implements `FnOnce`, which causes it to be moved when called
```
```
error[E0505]: cannot move out of `a` because it is borrowed
--> $DIR/variance-issue-20533.rs:28:14
|
LL | let a = AffineU32(1);
| - binding `a` declared here
LL | let x = foo(&a);
| -- borrow of `a` occurs here
LL | drop(a);
| ^ move out of `a` occurs here
LL | drop(x);
| - borrow later used here
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | let x = foo(&a).clone();
| ++++++++
```
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `val`, a captured variable in an `FnMut` closure
--> $DIR/issue-87456-point-to-closure.rs:10:28
|
LL | let val = String::new();
| --- captured outer variable
LL |
LL | take_mut(|| {
| -- captured by this `FnMut` closure
LL |
LL | let _foo: String = val;
| ^^^ move occurs because `val` has type `String`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
help: consider borrowing here
|
LL | let _foo: String = &val;
| +
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | let _foo: String = val.clone();
| ++++++++
```
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of `*x` which is behind a shared reference
--> $DIR/borrowck-fn-in-const-a.rs:6:16
|
LL | return *x
| ^^ move occurs because `*x` has type `String`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL - return *x
LL + return x.clone()
|
```
Call lower_const_param instead of duplicating the code
Follow up of #123689
r? `@oli-obk`
I had this commit in my old branch that I had forgotten about, `@fmease` pointed about this in #123689
I've left the branches that are not `Range` as do nothing as that's what we are currently doing but maybe we want to err or something.
