Add tests for `-Zunpretty=expanded` ported from stringify's tests
This PR adds a new set of tests for the AST pretty-printer.
Previously, pretty-printer edge cases were tested by way of `stringify!` in [tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.78.0/tests/ui/macros/stringify.rs), such as the tests added by 419b26931b and 527e2eac17.
Those tests will no longer provide effective coverage of the AST pretty-printer after #124141. `Nonterminal` and `TokenKind::Interpolated` are being removed, and a consequence is that `stringify!` will perform token stream pretty printing, instead of AST pretty printing, in all of the `stringify!` cases including $:expr and all other interpolations.
This PR adds 2 new ui tests with `compile-flags: -Zunpretty=expanded`:
- **tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-exhaustive.rs** — this test aims for exhaustive coverage of all the variants of `ExprKind`, `ItemKind`, `PatKind`, `StmtKind`, `TyKind`, and `VisibilityKind`. Some parts could use being fleshed out further, but the current state is roughly on par with what exists in the old stringify-based tests.
- **tests/ui/unpretty/expanded-interpolation.rs** — this test covers tricky macro metavariable edge cases that require the AST pretty printer to synthesize parentheses in order for the printed code to be valid Rust syntax.
r? `@nnethercote`
Only make GAT ambiguous in `match_projection_projections` considering shallow resolvability
In #123537, I tweaked the hack from #93892 to use `resolve_vars_if_possible` instead of `shallow_resolve`. This considers more inference guidance ambiguous. This resulted in crater regressions in #125196.
I've effectively reverted the change to the old behavior. That being said, I don't *like* this behavior, but I'd rather keep it for now since #123537 was not meant to make any behavioral changes. See the attached example.
This also affects the new solver, for the record, which doesn't have any rules about not guiding inference from param-env candidates which may constrain GAT args as a side-effect.
r? `@lcnr` or `@jackh726`
Rename Unsafe to Safety
Alternative to #124455, which is to just have one Safety enum to use everywhere, this opens the posibility of adding `ast::Safety::Safe` that's useful for unsafe extern blocks.
This leaves us today with:
```rust
enum ast::Safety {
Unsafe(Span),
Default,
// Safe (going to be added for unsafe extern blocks)
}
enum hir::Safety {
Unsafe,
Safe,
}
```
We would convert from `ast::Safety::Default` into the right Safety level according the context.
Temporarily revert to NonZeroUsize in rustc-abi to fix building on stable
rust-analyzer uses an auto-published version of `rustc-abi`, but `NonZero` isn't yet stable. This prevents us from updating the RA subtree, which is quite old already.
I can file a revert PR after the release.
Improve parser
Fixes#124935.
- Add a few more help diagnostics to incorrect semicolons
- Overall improved that function
- Addded a few comments
- Renamed diff_marker fns to git_diff_marker
android: use posix_memalign for aligned allocations
Our target page says
> Rust will support the most recent Long Term Support (LTS) Android Native Development Kit (NDK). By default Rust will support all API levels supported by the NDK, but a higher minimum API level may be required if deemed necessary.
According to [this](https://github.com/android/ndk/wiki/Changelog-r26), the minimum API level of the current LTS NDK is 21. According to [this](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44852378/android-ndk-r15b-posix-memalign-undeclared-identifier), posix_memalign exists since API level 16. So I think we should be able to use it here?
Fix println! ICE when parsing percent prefix number
This PR fixes#125002 ICE occurring, for example, with `println!("%100000", 1)` or `println!("% 100000", 1)`.
## Test Case/Change Explanation
The return type of `Num::from_str` has been changed to `Option<Self>` to handle errors when parsing large integers fails.
1. The first `println!` in the test case covers the change of the first `Num::from_str` usage in `format_foreign.rs:426`.
2. The second `println!` in the test case covers the change of the second `Num::from_str` usage in line 460.
3. The 3rd to 5th `Num::from_str` usages behave the same as before.
The 3rd usage would cause an ICE when `num > u16::MAX` in the previous version, but this commit does not include a fix for the ICE in `println!("{:100000$}")`. I think we need to emit an error in the compiler and have more discussion in another issue/PR.
Correct Neovim 0.10 inlay hints config example
This change is what I had to do to make inlay hints work on Neovim 0.10. The current example produces errors about wrong argument type to `.enable()`.
Update cargo
6 commits in 4de0094ac78743d2c8ff682489e35c8a7cafe8e4..0de7f2ec6c39d68022e6b97a39559d2f4dbf3930
2024-05-09 16:09:22 +0000 to 2024-05-17 16:54:54 +0000
- Add special `check-cfg` lint config for the `unexpected_cfgs` lint (rust-lang/cargo#13913)
- refactor: more comments and variable rename (rust-lang/cargo#13924)
- test: set safe.directory for git repo in apache container (rust-lang/cargo#13920)
- refactor: misc refactors for `ops::resolve` (rust-lang/cargo#13917)
- Preserve file permissions on unix during `write_atomic` (rust-lang/cargo#13898)
- Update benchmark formatting for new nightly (rust-lang/cargo#13901)
r? ghost
Inline Duration construction into `Duration::from_{secs,millis,micros,nanos}`
The millis/micros/nanos cases I don't feel as strongly about, but I see no reason why `Duration::from_secs` should call into `Duration::new` - that's just creating unnecessary work for the inlining and DCE passes.
Migrate `run-make/issue64319` to `rmake` and rename
Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).
~~I noticed that the Makefile was not listed in `allowed-run-makefiles` in Tidy. Does this mean the test was being ignored?~~ EDIT: No, it was there, just not in its expected alphabetical order.
EDIT2: Perhaps it could be interesting to clean this test visually by looping over the `rustc` calls, like in #125227.
