Emit feature error for parenthesized generics in associated type bounds
We don't actually do AST->HIR lowering with some `-Zunpretty` flags, so it's not correct to just delay a bug instead of emitting a feature error.
Some diagnostics regressed because of the new errors, but oh well. 🤷Fixes#109898
Fix `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint span
Fixes#109837
`DUMMY_SP` was being passed as the span in many cases where we have a span available to use. This meant that the location of the violating pattern wasn't shown, or the list of un-covered variants
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Pull some tuple variant fields out into their own struct
This is groundwork for adding more fields to those new structs, but I believe the change to be useful on its own.
r? `@Nilstrieb` but feel free to reroll for `compiler`
Remove `intercrate` and `mark_ambiguous` from `TypeRelation`
Fixes#109863
Pulls this logic into `super_combine_tys`, which has access to `InferCtxt` and takes a `ObligationEmittingRelation` -- both of which simplify the logic here.
r? `@oli-obk` `@aliemjay`
Never consider int and float vars for `FnPtr` candidates
This solves a regression where `0.0.cmp()` was ambiguous when a custom trait with a `cmp` method was in scope.
For integers it shouldn't be a problem in practice so I wasn't able to add a test.
I'm not sure whether there could be more issues hidden in the shadows as mentioned in the issue, but this should at least fix the problematic regression immediately.
fixes#109892
r? oli-obk
Use `&IndexSlice` instead of `&IndexVec` where possible
All the same reasons as for `[T]`: more general, less pointer chasing, and `&mut IndexSlice` emphasizes that it doesn't change *length*.
r? `@ghost`
This solves a regression where `0.0.cmp()` was ambiguous when a custom
trait with a `cmp` method was in scope.
FOr integers it shouldn't be a problem in practice so I wasn't able to
add a test.
Drop array patterns using subslices
Fixes#109004
Drops contiguous subslices of an array when moving elements out with a pattern, which improves perf for large arrays
r? `@compiler-errors`
Switch to LLD as default linker for {arm,thumb}v4t-none-eabi
The LLVM 16 update brought ARMv4t support to LLD. We should use it by default so users don't need to install an external linker.
cc `@Lokathor`
Fix subslice capture in closure
Fixes#109298 by refining captures in the same way for Subslices and Indexes. The comment `// we never capture this` seems to have been inaccurate, as changing it to an assert causes many test failures
`@rustbot` label +A-closures
Move `doc(primitive)` future incompat warning to `invalid_doc_attributes`
Fixes#88070.
It's been a while since this was turned into a "future incompatible lint" so I think we can now turn it into a hard error without problem.
r? `@jyn514`
Initial support for return type notation (RTN)
See: https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2023/02/13/return-type-notation-send-bounds-part-2/
1. Only supports `T: Trait<method(): Send>` style bounds, not `<T as Trait>::method(): Send`. Checking validity and injecting an implicit binder for all of the late-bound method generics is harder to do for the latter.
* I'd add this in a follow-up.
3. ~Doesn't support RTN in general type position, i.e. no `let x: <T as Trait>::method() = ...`~
* I don't think we actually want this.
5. Doesn't add syntax for "eliding" the function args -- i.e. for now, we write `method(): Send` instead of `method(..): Send`.
* May be a hazard if we try to add it in the future. I'll probably add it in a follow-up later, with a structured suggestion to change `method()` to `method(..)` once we add it.
7. ~I'm not in love with the feature gate name 😺~
* I renamed it to `return_type_notation` ✔️
Follow-up PRs will probably add support for `where T::method(): Send` bounds. I'm not sure if we ever want to support return-type-notation in arbitrary type positions. I may also make the bounds require `..` in the args list later.
r? `@ghost`
Add `IndexSlice` to go with `IndexVec`
Moves the methods that don't need full `IndexVec`-ness over to `IndexSlice`, and have `IndexVec` deref to `IndexSlice` so everything keeps working.
Doing this for later use in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606, where I'm hitting a bunch of things that are just slices and thus there's no way to index with the `FieldIdx`.
Insert alignment checks for pointer dereferences when debug assertions are enabled
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54915
- [x] Jake tells me this sounds like a place to use `MirPatch`, but I can't figure out how to insert a new basic block with a new terminator in the middle of an existing basic block, using `MirPatch`. (if nobody else backs up this point I'm checking this as "not actually a good idea" because the code looks pretty clean to me after rearranging it a bit)
- [x] Using `CastKind::PointerExposeAddress` is definitely wrong, we don't want to expose. Calling a function to get the pointer address seems quite excessive. ~I'll see if I can add a new `CastKind`.~ `CastKind::Transmute` to the rescue!
- [x] Implement a more helpful panic message like slice bounds checking.
r? `@oli-obk`
Rename `with_source_map` as `set_source_map`. Because `with` functions
(e.g. `with_session_globals`, `scoped_tls::ScopedKey::with`) are for
*getting* a value for the duration of a closure, and `set` functions
(e.g. `set_session_globals_then` `scoped_tls::ScopedKey::with`) are for
*setting* a value for the duration of a closure.
Also fix up the comment, which is wrong:
- The bit about `TyCtxt` is wrong.
- `span_debug1` doesn't exist any more.
- There's only one level of fallback, not two.
(This is effectively a follow-up to the changes in #93936.)
Also add a comment explaining that `SessionGlobals::source_map` should
only be used when absolutely necessary.
Update `ty::VariantDef` to use `IndexVec<FieldIdx, FieldDef>`
And while doing the updates for that, also uses `FieldIdx` in `ProjectionKind::Field` and `TypeckResults::field_indices`.
There's more places that could use it (like `rustc_const_eval` and `LayoutS`), but I tried to keep this PR from exploding to *even more* places.
Part 2/? of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
