Instantiate closure synthetic substs in root universe
In the UI test example, we end up generalizing an associated type (something like `<Map<Option<i32>, [closure upvars=?0]> as IntoIterator>::Item` generalizes into `<Map<Option<i32>, [closure upvars=?1]> as IntoIterator>::Item`) then assigning it to itself, emitting an alias-relate goal. This trivially holds via one of the normalizes-to candidates, instead of relating substs, so when closure analysis eventually sets `?0` to the actual upvars, `?1` never gets constrained. This ends up being reported as an ambiguity error during writeback.
Instead, we can take advantage of the fact that we *know* the closure substs live in the root universe. This will prevent them being generalized, since they always can be named, and the alias-relate above never gets emitted at all.
We can probably do this to a handful of other `next_ty_var` calls in typeck for variables that are clearly associated with the body of the program, but I wanted to limit this for now. Eventually, if we end up representing universes more faithfully like a tree or whatever, we can remove this and turn it back to just a call to `next_ty_var`.
Note: This is incredibly order-dependent -- we need to be assigning a type variable that was created *before* the closure substs, and we also need to actually have an unnormalized type at the time of the assignment. This currently seems easiest to trigger during call argument analysis just due to the fact that we instantiate the call's substs, normalize, THEN check args.
r? ```@lcnr```
Extend `unused_must_use` to cover block exprs
Given code like
```rust
#[must_use]
fn foo() -> i32 {
42
}
fn warns() {
{
foo();
}
}
fn does_not_warn() {
{
foo()
};
}
fn main() {
warns();
does_not_warn();
}
```
### Before This PR
```
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:8:9
|
8 | foo();
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_must_use)]` on by default
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
8 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++
warning: 1 warning emitted
```
### After This PR
```
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:8:9
|
8 | foo();
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_must_use)]` on by default
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
8 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:14:9
|
14 | foo()
| ^^^^^
|
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
14 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++ +
warning: 2 warnings emitted
```
Fixes#104253.
Fix explicit-outlives-requirements lint span
Fixes#105150 which caused the span reported by the explicit-outlives-requirements lint to be incorrect when
1) the lint should suggest the entire where clause to be removed and
2) there are inline bounds present that are not inferable outlives requirements
In particular, this would cause rustfix to leave a dangling empty where clause.
Error on unconstrained lifetime in RPITIT
Fixes#109468
The only thing is that I had to split `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/method-signature-matches.rs` into a bunch of different revisions because some error aren't being emitted if all the different examples are all together in one file 🤔
r? `@oli-obk` just because i know you'll review it, feel free to re-roll
Properly check associated consts for infer placeholders
We only reported an error if it was in a "suggestable" position (according to `is_suggestable_infer_ty`) -- this isn't correct for infer tys that can show up in other places in the constant's type, like behind a dyn trait.
fixes#112491
Collect VTable stats & add `-Zprint-vtable-sizes`
This is a bit hacky/buggy, but I'm not entirely sure how to fix it, so I want to ask reviewers for help...
To try this, use either of those:
- `cargo clean && RUSTFLAGS="-Zprint-vtable-sizes" cargo +toolchain b`
- `cargo clean && cargo rustc +toolchain -Zprint-vtable-sizes`
- `rustc +toolchain -Zprint-vtable-sizes ./file.rs`
Safe Transmute: Enable handling references
This patch enables support for references in Safe Transmute, by generating nested obligations during trait selection. Specifically, when we call `confirm_transmutability_candidate(...)`, we now recursively traverse the `rustc_transmute::Answer` tree and create obligations for all the `Answer` variants, some of which include multiple nested `Answer`s.
fix(resolve): update shadowed_glob more precision
- Fixes#109153
- Fixes#109962
## Why does it panic?
We use #109153 as an illustration.
The process of `resolve_imports` is:
| Iter | resolve | resolution of **`(Mod(root), Ident(bar) in type ns)`** |
| - | - | - |
| 0 | `use foo::*` | `binding` -> foo::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> `None` |
| 1 | `use bar::bar` | `binding` -> foo::bar::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> foo::bar |
| 2 | `use bar::*` | `binding` -> foo::bar::bar, `shallowed_glob` -> foo::bar::bar::bar |
So during `finalize_import`, the `root::bar` in `use bar::bar` had been pointed to `foo::bar::bar::bar`, which is different from the `initial_module` valued of `foo::bar`, therefore, the panic had been triggered.
## Try to solve it
~I think #109153 should check-pass rather than throw an ambiguous error. Following this idea, there are two ways to solve this problem:~
~1. Give up the `initial_module` and update `import.imported_module` after each resolution update. However, I think this method may have too much impact.~
~2. Do not update the `shadowed_glob` when it is defined.~
~To be honest, I am not sure if this is the right way to solve this ICE. Perhaps there is a better resolution.~
Edit: we had made the `resolution.shadowed_glob` update more detailed.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Make struct layout not depend on unsizeable tail
fixes (after backport) https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112048
Since unsizing `Ptr<Foo<T>>` -> `Ptr<Foo<U>` just copies the pointer and adds the metadata, the layout of `Foo` must not depend on niches in and alignment of the tail `T`.
Nominating for beta 1.71, because it will have this issue: `@rustbot` label beta-nominated
Add MVP suggestion for `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn`
Rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99827
cc tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71668
No real changes since the original PR, just migrated the new suggestion to use fluent messages and added a couple more testcases, AFAICT from the discussion there were no outstanding changes requested.
Adjust UI tests for `unit_bindings` lint
- Explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Use `let () = init;` or `let pat = ();` where appropriate.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test which wasn't actually testing a closure: `tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/run_pass/disjoint-capture-in-same-closure.rs`.
Note that unfortunately there's *a lot* of UI tests, there are a couple of places where I may have left something like `let (): ()` (this is not needed but is left over from an ealier version of the lint) which is bad style.
This PR is to help with the `unit_bindings` lint at #112380.
- Create `Answer` type that is not just a type alias of `Result`
- Remove a usage of `map_layouts` to make the code easier to read
- Don't hide errors related to Unknown Layout when computing transmutability
Suggest using `ptr::null_mut` when user provided `ptr::null` to a function expecting `ptr::null_mut`
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/ptr-null-mutability-suggestions.rs:9:24
|
LL | expecting_null_mut(ptr::null());
| ------------------ ^^^^^^^^^^^
| | |
| | types differ in mutability
| | help: consider using `core::ptr::null_mut` instead: `core::ptr::null_mut()`
| arguments to this function are incorrect
|
= note: expected raw pointer `*mut u8`
found raw pointer `*const _`
note: function defined here
--> $DIR/ptr-null-mutability-suggestions.rs:6:4
|
LL | fn expecting_null_mut(_: *mut u8) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------
```
Closes#85184.
- Either explicitly annotate `let x: () = expr;` where `x` has unit
type, or remove the unit binding to leave only `expr;` instead.
- Fix disjoint-capture-in-same-closure test
