avoid clone path prefix when lowering to hir
Found this while trying to parallelize `lower_to_hir`.
When lowering to hir, `Nested` paths in `ast` will be split and the prefix segments will be cloned. This could be omited, since the only consequence is that the prefix segments in `Path`s in hir will have the same `HirId`s, and it seems harmless.
This simplifies the process of lowering to hir and avoids re-modification of `ResolverAstLowering`.
r? `@Aaron1011`
cc #99292
Substitute types before checking inlining compatibility.
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112332 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113781
I don't have a minimal test, but I this seems to remove the ICE locally.
This whole pre-inlining validation mirrors the "real" MIR validation pass to verify that inlined MIR will still pass validation.
The debuginfo loop is added because MIR validation check projections in debuginfo.
Likewise, MIR validation only checks `is_subtype`, so there is no reason for a stronger check.
The types were not being substituted in `check_equal`, so we were not bailing out of inlining if the substituted MIR callee body would not pass validation.
Use SHA256 source file checksums by default when targeting MSVC
Currently, when targeting Windows (more specifically, the MSVC toolchain), Rust will use SHA1 source file checksums by default. SHA1 has been superseded by SHA256, and Microsoft recommends migrating to SHA256.
As of Visual Studio 2022, MSVC defaults to SHA256. This change aligns Rust and MSVC.
LLVM can already use SHA256 checksums, so this does not require any change to LLVM.
MSVC docs on source file checksums: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zh?view=msvc-170
Support `--print KIND=PATH` command line syntax
As is already done for `--emit KIND=PATH` and `-L KIND=PATH`.
In the discussion of #110785, it was pointed out that `--print KIND=PATH` is nicer than trying to apply the single global `-o` path to `--print`'s output, because in general there can be multiple print requests within a single rustc invocation, and anyway `-o` would already be used for a different meaning in the case of `link-args` and `native-static-libs`.
I am interested in using `--print cfg=PATH` in Buck2. Currently Buck2 works around the lack of support for `--print KIND=PATH` by [indirecting through a Python wrapper script](d43cf3a51a/prelude/rust/tools/get_rustc_cfg.py) to redirect rustc's stdout into the location dictated by the build system.
From skimming Cargo's usages of `--print`, it definitely seems like it would benefit from `--print KIND=PATH` too. Currently it is working around the lack of this by inserting `--crate-name=___ --print=crate-name` so that it can look for a line containing `___` as a delimiter between the 2 other `--print` informations it actually cares about. This is commented as a "HACK" and "abuse". 31eda6f7c3/src/cargo/core/compiler/build_context/target_info.rs (L242) (FYI `@weihanglo` as you dealt with this recently in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/11633.)
Mentioning reviewers active in #110785: `@fee1-dead` `@jyn514` `@bjorn3`
Resurrect: rustc_llvm: Add a -Z `print-codegen-stats` option to expose LLVM statistics.
This resurrects PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000, which has sat idle for a while. And I want to see the effect of stack-move optimizations on LLVM (like https://reviews.llvm.org/D153453) :).
I have applied the changes requested by `@oli-obk` and `@nagisa` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000#discussion_r1014625377 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104000#discussion_r1014642482 in the latest commits.
r? `@oli-obk`
-----
LLVM has a neat [statistics](https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#the-statistic-class-stats-option) feature that tracks how often optimizations kick in. It's very handy for optimization work. Since we expose the LLVM pass timings, I thought it made sense to expose the LLVM statistics too.
-----
(Edit: fix broken link
(Edit2: fix segmentation fault and use malloc
If `rustc` is built with
```toml
[llvm]
assertions = true
```
Then you can see like
```
rustc +stage1 -Z print-codegen-stats -C opt-level=3 tmp.rs
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
3 aa - Number of MayAlias results
193 aa - Number of MustAlias results
531 aa - Number of NoAlias results
...
```
And the current default build emits only
```
$ rustc +stage1 -Z print-codegen-stats -C opt-level=3 tmp.rs
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Statistics Collected ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
$
```
This might be better to emit the message to tell assertion flag necessity, but now I can't find how to do that...
Always const-prop scalars and scalar pairs
This removes some complexity from the pass.
The limitation to propagate ScalarPairs only for tuple comes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67015, when ScalarPair constant were modeled using `Rvalue::Aggregate`. Nowadays, we use `ConstValue::ByRef`, which does not care about the underlying type.
The justification for not propagating in all cases was perf. This seems not to be a clear cut any more: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113858#issuecomment-1642396746
Refactor vtable encoding and optimize it for the case of multiple marker traits
This PR does two things
- Refactor `prepare_vtable_segments` (this was motivated by the other change, `prepare_vtable_segments` was quite hard to understand and while trying to edit it I've refactored it)
- Mostly remove `loop`s labeled `break`s/`continue`s whenever there is a simpler solution
- Also use `?`
- Make vtable format a bit more efficient wrt to marker traits
- See the tests for an example
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113840
cc `@crlf0710`
----
Review wise it's probably best to review each commit individually, as then it's more clear why the refactoring is correct.
I can split the last two commits (which change behavior) into a separate PR if it makes reviewing easier
Querify unused trait check.
This code transitively loads information for all bodies, and from resolutions. As it does not return a value, it should be beneficial to have it as a query.
Don't translate compiler-internal bug messages
These are not very useful to be translated, as
* translators would get really weird and bad english versions to start out from,
* compiler devs have to do some work for what is supposed to be dead code and just a sanity check,
* the target audience is other compiler devs.
r? `@davidtwco`
new solver: don't consider blanket impls multiple times
only consider candidates which rely on the self type in `assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty`.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Turn copy into moves during DSE.
Dead store elimination computes whether removing a direct store to an unborrowed place is allowed.
Where removing a store is allowed, writing `uninit` is too.
This means that we can use this pass to transform `copy` operands into `move` operands. This is only interesting in call terminators, so we only handle those.
Special care is taken for the `use_both(_1, _1)` case:
- moving the second argument is ok, as `_1` is not live after the call;
- moving the first argument is not, as the second argument reads `_1`.
Fixes#75993
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108068
r? `@RalfJung`
cc `@JakobDegen`
Verify that all crate sources are in sync
This ensures that rustc will not attempt to link against a cdylib as if it is a rust dylib when an rlib for the same crate is available. Previously rustc didn't actually check if any further formats of a crate which has been loaded are of the same version and if they are actually valid. This caused a cdylib to be interpreted as rust dylib as soon as the corresponding rlib was loaded. As cdylibs don't export any rust symbols, linking would fail if rustc decides to link against the cdylib rather than the rlib.
Two crates depended on the previous behavior by separately compiling a test crate as both rlib and dylib. These have been changed to capture their original spirit to the best of my ability while still working when rustc verifies that all crates are in sync. It is unlikely that build systems depend on the current behavior and in any case we are taking a lot of measures to ensure that any change to either the source or the compilation options (including crate type) results in rustc rejecting it as incompatible. We merely didn't do this check here for now obsolete perf reasons.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/10786
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82151
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82972
Closes https://github.com/bevy-cheatbook/bevy-cheatbook/issues/114
Use the correct span for displaying the line following a derive sugge…
`span` here is the main span of the diagnostic. In the linked issue's case, this belongs to `main.rs`. However, the line numbers (and line we are trying to display) are in `name.rs`, so using `span_to_lines` gives us the wrong `FileLines`.
Use `parts[0].span` (the span of the suggestion) here like the rest of the code does to get the right file.
Not sure if this needs a dedicated test because this fixes an existing error in the UI suite
Fixes#113844
Properly document `lifetime_mapping` in `OpaqueTy`
Also use an `Option` to signify that the value is actually present, instead of just no captured lifetimes.
