Only point out non-diverging arms for match suggestions
Fixes#121144
There is no reason to point at diverging arms, which will always coerce to whatever is the match block's evaluated type.
This also removes the suggestion from #106601, since as I pointed out in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72634#issuecomment-1946210898 the added suggestion is not firing in the right cases, but instead only when one of the match arms already *actually* evaluates to `()`.
r? estebank
Make `async Fn` trait kind errors better
1. Make it so that async closures with the wrong closurekind actually report a useful error
2. Explain why async closures can sometimes not implement `Fn`/`FnMut` (because they capture things)
r? oli-obk
Consider principal trait ref's auto-trait super-traits in dyn upcasting
Given traits like:
```rust
trait Subtrait: Supertrait + Send {}
trait Supertrait {}
```
We should be able to upcast `dyn Subtrait` to `dyn Supertrait + Send`. This is not currently possible, because when upcasting, we look at the list of auto traits in the object type (`dyn Subtrait`, which has no auto traits in its bounds) and compare them to the target's auto traits (`dyn Supertrait + Send`, which has `Send` in its bound).
Since the target has auto traits that are not present in the source, the upcasting fails. This is overly restrictive, since `dyn Subtrait` will always implement `Send` via its built-in object impl. I propose to loosen this restriction here.
r? types
---
### ~~Aside: Fix this in astconv instead?~~
### edit: This causes too many failures. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119825#issuecomment-1890847150
We may also fix this by by automatically elaborating all auto-trait supertraits during `AstConv::conv_object_ty_poly_trait_ref`. That is, we can make it so that `dyn Subtrait` is elaborated into the same type of `dyn Subtrait + Send`.
I'm open to considering this solution instead, but it would break coherence in the following example:
```rust
trait Foo: Send {}
trait Bar {}
impl Bar for dyn Foo {}
impl Bar for dyn Foo + Send {}
//~^ This would begin to be an overlapping impl.
```
Fix msg for verbose suggestions with confusable capitalization
When encountering a verbose/multipart suggestion that has changes that are only caused by different capitalization of ASCII letters that have little differenciation, expand the message to highlight that fact (like we already do for inline suggestions).
The logic to do this was already present, but implemented incorrectly.
Implicitly enable evex512 if avx512 is enabled
LLVM 18 requires the evex512 feature to allow use of zmm registers. LLVM automatically sets it when using a generic CPU, but not when `-C target-cpu` is specified. This will result either in backend legalization crashes, or code unexpectedly using ymm instead of zmm registers.
For now, make sure that `avx512*` features imply `evex512`. Long term we'll probably have to deal with the AVX10 mess somehow.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121081.
r? `@Amanieu`
Store static initializers in metadata instead of the MIR of statics.
This means that adding generic statics would be even more difficult, as we can't evaluate statics from other crates anymore, but the subtle issue I have encountered make me think that having this be an explicit problem is better.
The issue is that
```rust
static mut FOO: &mut u32 = &mut 42;
static mut BAR = unsafe { FOO };
```
gets different allocations, instead of referring to the same one. This is also true for non-static mut, but promotion makes `static FOO: &u32 = &42;` annoying to demo.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61345
## Why is this being done?
In order to ensure all crates see the same nested allocations (which is the last issue that needs fixing before we can stabilize [`const_mut_refs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349)), I am working on creating anonymous (from the Rust side, to LLVM it's like a regular static item) static items for the nested allocations in a static. If we evaluate the static item in a downstream crate again, we will end up duplicating its nested allocations (and in some cases, like the `match` case, even duplicate the main allocation).
Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter.
Reinstate some delayed bugs.
These were changed to `has_errors` assertions in #121071 because that seemed reasonable, but evidently not.
Fixes#121103.
Fixes#121108.
Do not report overflow errors on ConstArgHasType goals
This is 10% of a fix for #121090, since it at least means that we no longer mention the `ConstArgHasType` goal as the cause for the overflow. Instead, now we mention:
```
overflow evaluating the requirement `{closure@$DIR/overflow-during-mono.rs:13:41: 13:44}: Sized`
```
which is not much better, but slightly.
r? oli-obk
When encountering a verbose/multipart suggestion that has changes
that are only caused by different capitalization of ASCII letters that have
little differenciation, expand the message to highlight that fact (like we
already do for inline suggestions).
The logic to do this was already present, but implemented incorrectly.
Continue compilation after check_mod_type_wf errors
The ICEs fixed here were probably reachable through const eval gymnastics before, but now they are easily reachable without that, too.
The new errors are often bugfixes, where useful errors were missing, because they were reported after the early abort. In other cases sometimes they are just duplication of already emitted errors, which won't be user-visible due to deduplication.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120860
LLVM 18 requires the evex512 feature to allow use of zmm registers.
LLVM automatically sets it when using a generic CPU, but not when
`-C target-cpu` is specified. This will result either in backend
legalization crashes, or code unexpectedly using ymm instead of
zmm registers.
For now, make sure that `avx512*` features imply `evex512`. Long
term we'll probably have to deal with the AVX10 mess somehow.
Fix two UI tests with incorrect directive / invalid revision
- `tests/ui/borrowck/copy-suggestion-region-vid.rs` had a `ui_test`-style directive on compiletest: `//`@run-rustfix`.`
- `tests/ui/asm/inline-syntax.rs` has directives for a undeclared revision `[x86_64_allowed]` which seems to have the same directives as declared revision `[x86_64]`.
Fix suggestion span for `?Sized` when param type has default
Fixes#120878
Diagnostic suggests adding `: ?Sized` in an incorrect place if a type parameter default is present
r? `@fmease`
Be less confident when `dyn` suggestion is not checked for object safety
#120275 no longer checks bare traits for object safety when making a `dyn` suggestion on Rust < 2021. In this case, qualify the suggestion with a note that the trait must be object safe, to prevent user confusion as seen in #116434
r? ```@fmease```
Do not assemble candidates for default impls
There is no reason (as far as I can tell?) that we should assemble an impl candidate for a default impl. This candidate itself does not prove that the impl holds, and any time that it *does* hold, there will be a more specializing non-default impl that also is assembled.
This is because `default impl<T> Foo for T {}` actually expands to `impl<T> Foo for T where T: Foo {}`. The only way to satisfy that where clause (without coinduction) is via *another* implementation that does hold -- precisely an impl that specializes it.
This should fix the specialization related regressions for #116494. That should lead to one root crate regression that doesn't have to do with specialization, which I think we can regress.
r? lcnr cc ``@rust-lang/types``
cc #31844
Check normalized call signature for WF in mir typeck
Unfortunately we don't check that the built-in implementations for `Fn*` traits are actually well-formed in the same way that we do for user-provided impls.
Essentially, when checking a call terminator, we end up with a signature that references an unnormalized `<[closure] as FnOnce<...>>::Output` in its output. That output type, due to the built-in impl, doesn't follow the expected rule that `WF(ty)` implies `WF(normalized(ty))`. We fix this by also checking the normalized signature here.
**See** boxy's detailed and useful explanation comment which explains this in more detail: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114936#issuecomment-1710388741Fixes#114936Fixes#118876
r? types
cc ``@BoxyUwU`` ``@lcnr``
