Add tests for raw-dylib with vectorcall, and fix vectorcall code generation
* Adds tests for using `raw-dylib` (#58713) with `vectorcall`.
* Fixed code generation for `vectorcall` (parameters have to be marked with `InReg`, just like `fastcall`).
* Enabled running the `raw-dylib` `fastcall` tests when using MSVC (since I had to add support in the test for running MSVC-only tests since GCC doesn't support `vectorcall`).
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99340 (Fix ICE in Definitions::create_def)
- #99629 (Improve `cannot move out of` error message)
- #99864 (bootstrap: don't emit warn about duplicated deps with same/different features if some of sets actually empty)
- #99911 (Remove some uses of `guess_head_span`)
- #99976 (Make Rustdoc exit with correct error code when scraping examples from invalid files)
- #100003 (Improve size assertions.)
- #100012 (Avoid `Ty` to `String` conversions)
- #100020 (better error when python is not found in x - issue #99648)
Failed merges:
- #99994 (Replace `guess_head_span` with `opt_span`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Improve size assertions.
- For any file with four or more size assertions, move them into a
separate module (as is already done for `hir.rs`).
- Add some more for AST nodes and THIR nodes.
- Put the `hir.rs` ones in alphabetical order.
r? `@lqd`
Fix ICE in Definitions::create_def
`Debug` implementation for `LocalDefId` uses global `Definitions`. Normally it’s ok, but we can’t do it while holding a mutable reference to `Definitions`, since it causes ICE or deadlock (depending on whether `parallel_compiler` is enabled).
This PR effectively copies the `Debug` implementation into the problematic method. I don’t particularly love this solution (since it creates code duplication), but I don’t see any other options.
This issue was discovered when running `rustdoc` with `RUSTDOC_LOG=trace` on the following file:
```rust
pub struct SomeStruct;
fn asdf() {
impl SomeStruct {
pub fn qwop(&self) {
println!("hidden function");
}
}
}
```
I’m not sure how to create a test for this behavior.
Limit symbols exported from proc macros
Only `__rustc_proc_macro_decls_*__` and `rust_metadata_*` need to be
exported for proc macros to work. All other symbols only increase binary
size and have the potential to conflict with symbols from the host
compiler.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99909Fixes#59998
cc `@eddyb`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99519 (Remove implicit names and values from `--cfg` in `--check-cfg`)
- #99620 (`-Z location-detail`: provide option to disable all location details)
- #99932 (Fix unwinding on certain platforms when debug assertions are enabled)
- #99973 (Layout things)
- #99980 (Remove more Clean trait implementations)
- #99984 (Fix compat.rs for `cfg(miri)`)
- #99986 (Add wrap suggestions for record variants)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
- For any file with four or more size assertions, move them into a
separate module (as is already done for `hir.rs`).
- Add some more for AST nodes and THIR nodes.
- Put the `hir.rs` ones in alphabetical order.
From 72 bytes to 12 bytes (on x86-64).
There are two parts to this:
- Changing various source code offsets from 64-bit to 32-bit. This is
not a problem because the rest of rustc also uses 32-bit source code
offsets. This means `Token` is no longer `Copy` but this causes no
problems.
- Removing the `RawStrError` from `LiteralKind`. Raw string literal
invalidity is now indicated by a `None` value within
`RawStr`/`RawByteStr`, and the new `validate_raw_str` function can be
used to re-lex an invalid raw string literal to get the `RawStrError`.
There is one very small change in behaviour. Previously, if a raw string
literal matched both the `InvalidStarter` and `TooManyHashes` cases,
the latter would override the former. This has now changed, because
`raw_double_quoted_string` now uses `?` and so returns immediately upon
detecting the `InvalidStarter` case. I think this is a slight
improvement to report the earlier-detected error, and it explains the
change in the `test_too_many_hashes` test.
The commit also removes a couple of comments that refer to #77629 and
say that the size of these types don't affect performance. These
comments are wrong, though the performance effect is small.
Fix cloning from a BitSet with a different domain size
The previous implementation incorrectly assumed that the
number of words in a bit set is equal to the domain size.
The new implementation delegates to `Vec::clone_from` which
is specialized for `Copy` elements.
Fixes#99006.
Add wrap suggestions for record variants
This PR adds a suggestions to wrap an expression in a record struct/variant when encountering mismatched types, similarly to a suggestion to wrap expression in a tuple struct that was added before.
An example:
```rust
struct B {
f: u8,
}
enum E {
A(u32),
B { f: u8 },
}
fn main() {
let _: B = 1;
let _: E = 1;
}
```
```text
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> ./t.rs:11:16
|
11 | let _: B = 1;
| - ^ expected struct `B`, found integer
| |
| expected due to this
|
help: try wrapping the expression in `B`
|
11 | let _: B = B { f: 1 };
| ++++++ +
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> ./t.rs:12:16
|
12 | let _: E = 1;
| - ^ expected enum `E`, found integer
| |
| expected due to this
|
help: try wrapping the expression in a variant of `E`
|
12 | let _: E = E::A(1);
| +++++ +
12 | let _: E = E::B { f: 1 };
| +++++++++ +
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
Layout things
These two commits are pretty independent, but didn't seem worth doing individual PRs for:
- Always check that size is a multiple of align, even without debug assertions
- Change Layout debug printing to put `variants` last, since it often huge and not usually the part we are most interested in
Cc `@eddyb`
`-Z location-detail`: provide option to disable all location details
As reported [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89920#issuecomment-1190598924), when I first implemented the `-Z location-detail` flag there was a bug, where passing an empty list was not correctly supported, and instead rejected by the compiler. This PR fixes that such that passing an empty list results in no location details being tracked, as originally specified in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2091 .
This PR also adds a test case to verify that this option continues to work as intended.
Remove implicit names and values from `--cfg` in `--check-cfg`
This PR remove the implicit names and values from `--cfg` in `--check-cfg` because the behavior is quite surprising but also because it's really easy to inadvertently really on the implicitness and when the `--cfg` is not set anymore to have an unexpected warning from an unexpected condition that pass with the implicitness.
This change in behavior will also enable us to warn when an unexpected `--cfg` is passed, ex: the user wrote `--cfg=unstabl` instead of `--cfg=unstable`. The implementation of the warning will be done in a follow-up PR.
cc `@petrochenkov`
Suggest removing a semicolon and boxing the expressions for if-else
`InferCtxt::suggest_remove_semi_or_return_binding` was not working well, so I fixed it and added a ui test.
Introduce an ArchiveBuilderBuilder
This avoids monomorphizing all linker code for each codegen backend and will allow passing in extra information to the archive builder from the codegen backend. I'm going to use this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97485 to allow passing in the right function to extract symbols from object files to a generic archive builder to be used by cg_llvm, cg_clif and cg_gcc.
Use `impl`'s generics when suggesting fix on bad `impl Copy`
See the UI test for a more complicated example, but we weren't correctly suggesting to add bounds given a manual `impl` whose generics didn't match the struct generics.
```rust
#[derive(Clone)]
struct Wrapper<T>(T);
impl<S> Copy for Wrapper<S> {}
```
Coincidentally this fix didn't cause any regressions for `derive(Copy)` impls, I think because those use the same spans in the impl generics as the struct generics, so the machinery still applies the same change.
Fix the size of niche enums with ZST alignment
For enums with an aligned ZST variant, like `[T; 0]`, the niche layout
was not computing a sufficient size to be consistent with alignment. Now
we pad that size up to the alignment, and also make sure to only use the
niche variant's ABI when the size and alignment still match.
Fixes#99836
r? `@eddyb`
Also gate AllocatedPointer and AllocAlign definitions by LLVM_VERSION_GE
Fixes a warning:
```
warning: llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp:159:11: warning: enumeration values 'AllocatedPointer' and 'AllocAlign' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
warning: switch (Kind) {
warning: ^
```
Which was fall out from 130a1df71e.
Fixes#99955
For enums with an aligned ZST variant, like `[T; 0]`, the niche layout
was not computing a sufficient size to be consistent with alignment. Now
we pad that size up to the alignment, and also make sure to only use the
niche variant's ABI when the size and alignment still match.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99311 (change maybe_body_owned_by to take local def id)
- #99862 (Improve type mismatch w/ function signatures)
- #99895 (don't call type ascription "cast")
- #99900 (remove some manual hash stable impls)
- #99903 (Add diagnostic when using public instead of pub)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fixes a warning:
warning: llvm-wrapper/RustWrapper.cpp:159:11: warning: enumeration values 'AllocatedPointer' and 'AllocAlign' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
warning: switch (Kind) {
warning: ^
Which was fall out from 130a1df71e.
Add diagnostic when using public instead of pub
Forwarding from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99706
I accidentally broke something(??) in git and the commits in that PR are absolutely not what I did in that branch
Anyways, this is the PR for this now. Adding tests again in a minute.
cc `@davidtwco`
Improve type mismatch w/ function signatures
This PR makes use of `note: expected/found` (instead of labeling types in labels) in type mismatch with function signatures. Pros: it's easier to compare the signatures, cons: the error is a little more verbose now.
This is especially nice when
- The signatures differ in a small subset of parameters (same parameters are elided)
- The difference is in details, for example `isize` vs `usize` (there is a better chance that the types align)
Also this PR fixes the inconsistency in variable names in the edited code (`expected` and `found`).
A zulip thread from which this pr started: [[link]](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/147480-t-compiler.2Fwg-diagnostics/topic/Type.20error.20regression.3F.2E.2E.2E/near/289756602).
An example diagnostic:
<table>
<tr>
<th>this pr</th>
<th>nightly</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
```text
error[E0631]: type mismatch in function arguments
--> ./t.rs:4:12
|
4 | expect(&f);
| ------ ^^ expected due to this
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
...
10 | fn f(_: isize, _: u8, _: Vec<u32>) {}
| ---------------------------------- found signature defined here
|
= note: expected function signature `fn(usize, _, Vec<u64>) -> _`
found function signature `fn(isize, _, Vec<u32>) -> _`
note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `Trait` for `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) {f}`
--> ./t.rs:8:9
|
8 | impl<F> Trait for F where F: Fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> u8 {}
| ^^^^^ ^
= note: required for the cast from `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) {f}` to the object type `dyn Trait`
```
</td>
<td>
```text
error[E0631]: type mismatch in function arguments
--> ./t.rs:4:12
|
4 | expect(&f);
| ------ ^^ expected signature of `fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> _`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
...
10 | fn f(_: isize, _: u8, _: Vec<u32>) {}
| ---------------------------------- found signature of `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) -> _`
|
note: required because of the requirements on the impl of `Trait` for `fn(isize, u8, Vec<u32>) {f}`
--> ./t.rs:8:9
|
8 | impl<F> Trait for F where F: Fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> u8 {}
| ^^^^^ ^
= note: required for the cast to the object type `dyn Trait`
```
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<details><summary>code</summary>
<p>
```rust
fn main() {
fn expect(_: &dyn Trait) {}
expect(&f);
}
trait Trait {}
impl<F> Trait for F where F: Fn(usize, u8, Vec<u64>) -> u8 {}
fn f(_: isize, _: u8, _: Vec<u32>) {}
```
</p>
</details>
r? `@compiler-errors`
