LLVM 16: Update RISCV data layout
The RISCV data layout was changed in 974e2e690b.
This updates all `riscv64*` targets, though I don't really know what the difference between the `gc` and `imac` ones is.
Passes `x test codegen` at LLVM head and with the currently bundled LLVM version. Without this patch, some tests fail with:
> error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/context.rs:192:13: data-layout for target `riscv64gc-unknown-none-elf`, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n64-S128`, differs from LLVM target's `riscv64` default layout, `e-m:e-p:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128
Add type_array to BaseTypeMethods
Moved `type_array` function to `rustc_codegen_ssa::BaseTypeMethods` trait. This allows using normal `alloca` function to create arrays as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104022.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
Implement `std::marker::Tuple`, use it in `extern "rust-call"` and `Fn`-family traits
Implements rust-lang/compiler-team#537
I made a few opinionated decisions in this implementation, specifically:
1. Enforcing `extern "rust-call"` on fn items during wfcheck,
2. Enforcing this for all functions (not just ones that have bodies),
3. Gating this `Tuple` marker trait behind its own feature, instead of grouping it into (e.g.) `unboxed_closures`.
Still needing to be done:
1. Enforce that `extern "rust-call"` `fn`-ptrs are well-formed only if they have 1/2 args and the second one implements `Tuple`. (Doing this would fix ICE in #66696.)
2. Deny all explicit/user `impl`s of the `Tuple` trait, kinda like `Sized`.
3. Fixing `Tuple` trait built-in impl for chalk, so that chalkification tests are un-broken.
Open questions:
1. Does this need t-lang or t-libs signoff?
Fixes#99820
Moved type_array function to rustc_codegen_ssa::BaseTypeMethods trait.
This allows using normal alloca function to create arrays as suggested in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104022.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103012 (Suggest use .. to fill in the rest of the fields of Struct)
- #103851 (Fix json flag in bootstrap doc)
- #103990 (rustdoc: clean up `.logo-container` layout CSS)
- #104002 (fix a comment in UnsafeCell::new)
- #104014 (Migrate test-arrow to CSS variables)
- #104016 (Add internal descriptions to a few queries)
- #104035 (Add 'closure match' test to weird-exprs.rs.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rework applying closure requirements in borrowck
Previously the promoted closure constraints were registered under the category `ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds` in `type_check::prove_closure_bounds()` and then mapped back their original category in `regions_infer::best_blame_constraint` using the complicated map `closure_bounds_mapping`.
Now we're registering promoted constraints under their original category and span earlier in `type_check::prove_closure_bounds`.
See commit messages.
Fixes#99245
[debuginfo] Make cpp-like debuginfo type names for slices and str consistent.
Before this PR, the compiler would emit the debuginfo name `slice$<T>` for all kinds of slices, regardless of whether they are behind a reference or not and regardless of the kind of reference. As a consequence, the types `Foo<&[T]>`, `Foo<[T]>`, and `Foo<&mut [T]>` would end up with the same type name `Foo<slice$<T> >` in debuginfo, making it impossible to disambiguate between them by name. Similarly, `&str` would get the name `str` in debuginfo, so the debuginfo name for `Foo<str>` and `Foo<&str>` would be the same. In contrast, `*const [bool]` and `*mut [bool]` would be `ptr_const$<slice$<bool> >` and `ptr_mut$<slice$<bool> >`, i.e. the encoding does not lose information about the type.
This PR removes all special handling for slices and `str`. The types `&[bool]`, `&mut [bool]`, and `&str` thus get the names `ref$<slice2$<bool> >`, `ref_mut$<slice2$<bool> >`, and `ref$<str$>` respectively -- as one would expect.
The new special name for slices is `slice2$` to differentiate it from the previous name `slice$`, which has different semantics. The same is true for `str` and `str$`. This kind of versioning already has a precedent with the case of `enum$` and `enum2$` and hopefully will make it easier to transition existing consumers of these names.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-debugging` `@vadimcn`
r? `@wesleywiser`
UPDATE: Here is a table to clarify the changes
| Rust type | DWARF name | C++-like name (before) | C++-like name (after) |
|-----------|------------|------------------------|------------------------|
| `[T]` | `[T]` | `slice$<T>` | `slice2$<T>` |
| `&[T]` | `&[T]` | `slice$<T>` | `ref$<slice2$<T> >` |
| `&mut [T]` | `&mut [T]` | `slice$<T>` | `ref_mut$<slice2$<T> >`|
| `str` | `str` | `str` | `str$` |
| `&str` | `&str` | `str` | `ref$<str$>` |
| `&mut str` | `&mut str` | `str` | `ref_mut$<str$>`|
| `*const [T]` | `*const [T]` | `ptr_const$<slice$<T> >` | `ptr_const$<slice2$<T> >` |
| `*mut [T]` | `*mut [T]` | `ptr_mut$<slice$<T> >` | `ptr_mut$<slice2$<T> >` |
As you can see, before the PR many types would end up with the same name, making it impossible to distinguish between them in NatVis or other places where types are matched or looked up by name. The DWARF version of names is not changed.
Remove `has_errors` from `FnCtxt`
It doesn't seem like this `has_errors` flag actually suppresses any errors (at least in the UI test suite) --- except for one test (`E0767.rs`), and I think that error really should be considered legitimate, since it has nothing to do with the error code and continues to exist after you fix the first error...
This flag was added by ```@eddyb``` in 6b3cc0b8c8, and it's likely that it was made redundant due to subsequent restructuring of the compiler.
It only affects block type-checking anyways, so its effect does seem limited these days anyway.
improve `filesearch::get_or_default_sysroot`
`fn get_or_default_sysroot` is now improved and used in `miri` and `clippy`, and tests are still passing as they should. So we no longer need to implement custom workarounds/hacks to find sysroot in tools like miri/clippy.
Resolves https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98832
re-opened from #103581
Spans are independent of the body being borrow-checked, so they don't
need remapping when promoting type-tests and they yield more specific
error spans inside bodies of closures/inline consts.
Don't use `ConstraintCategory::ClosureBounds`!
Set the category and the span for the promoted constraints to that of
the original constraint earlier than before.
This eliminates the need for `closure_bounds_mapping`.
