MIR borrowck: implement union-and-array-compatible semantics
Fixes #44831. Fixes #44834. Fixes #45537. Fixes #45696 (by implementing DerefPure semantics, which is what we want going forward).
This commit is contained in:
parent
abe85ab0b2
commit
6bc4b50511
5 changed files with 368 additions and 59 deletions
|
@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ use dataflow::move_paths::{IllegalMoveOriginKind, MoveError};
|
|||
use dataflow::move_paths::{HasMoveData, LookupResult, MoveData, MoveOutIndex, MovePathIndex};
|
||||
use util::borrowck_errors::{BorrowckErrors, Origin};
|
||||
|
||||
use std::iter;
|
||||
|
||||
use self::MutateMode::{JustWrite, WriteAndRead};
|
||||
|
||||
pub(crate) mod nll;
|
||||
|
@ -710,7 +712,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
context,
|
||||
(sd, place_span.0),
|
||||
flow_state,
|
||||
|this, _index, borrow, common_prefix| match (rw, borrow.kind) {
|
||||
|this, _index, borrow| match (rw, borrow.kind) {
|
||||
(Read(_), BorrowKind::Shared) => Control::Continue,
|
||||
(Read(kind), BorrowKind::Unique) | (Read(kind), BorrowKind::Mut) => {
|
||||
match kind {
|
||||
|
@ -727,7 +729,6 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
error_reported = true;
|
||||
this.report_conflicting_borrow(
|
||||
context,
|
||||
common_prefix,
|
||||
place_span,
|
||||
bk,
|
||||
&borrow,
|
||||
|
@ -748,7 +749,6 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
error_reported = true;
|
||||
this.report_conflicting_borrow(
|
||||
context,
|
||||
common_prefix,
|
||||
place_span,
|
||||
bk,
|
||||
&borrow,
|
||||
|
@ -1478,7 +1478,356 @@ enum NoMovePathFound {
|
|||
ReachedStatic,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The degree of overlap between 2 places for borrow-checking.
|
||||
enum Overlap {
|
||||
/// The places might partially overlap - in this case, we give
|
||||
/// up and say that they might conflict. This occurs when
|
||||
/// different fields of a union are borrowed. For example,
|
||||
/// if `u` is a union, we have no way of telling how disjoint
|
||||
/// `u.a.x` and `a.b.y` are.
|
||||
Arbitrary,
|
||||
/// The places are either completely disjoint or equal - this
|
||||
/// is the "base case" on which we recur for extensions of
|
||||
/// the place.
|
||||
EqualOrDisjoint,
|
||||
/// The places are disjoint, so we know all extensions of them
|
||||
/// will also be disjoint.
|
||||
Disjoint,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// Given that the bases of `elem1` and `elem2` are always either equal
|
||||
// or disjoint (and have the same type!), return the overlap situation
|
||||
// between `elem1` and `elem2`.
|
||||
fn place_element_conflict(&self,
|
||||
elem1: &Place<'tcx>,
|
||||
elem2: &Place<'tcx>)
|
||||
-> Overlap
|
||||
{
|
||||
match (elem1, elem2) {
|
||||
(Place::Local(l1), Place::Local(l2)) => {
|
||||
if l1 == l2 {
|
||||
// the same local - base case, equal
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-OR-EQ-LOCAL");
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// different locals - base case, disjoint
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-LOCAL");
|
||||
Overlap::Disjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Place::Static(statik1), Place::Static(statik2)) => {
|
||||
// We ignore borrows of mutable statics elsewhere, but
|
||||
// we need to keep track of thread-locals so we can
|
||||
// complain if they live loner than the function.
|
||||
if statik1.def_id == statik2.def_id {
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-OR-EQ-STATIC");
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-STATIC");
|
||||
Overlap::Disjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Place::Local(_), Place::Static(_)) |
|
||||
(Place::Static(_), Place::Local(_)) => {
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-STATIC-LOCAL");
|
||||
Overlap::Disjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Place::Projection(pi1), Place::Projection(pi2)) => {
|
||||
match (&pi1.elem, &pi2.elem) {
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Deref, ProjectionElem::Deref) => {
|
||||
// derefs (e.g. `*x` vs. `*x`) - recur.
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-OR-EQ-DEREF");
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Field(f1, _), ProjectionElem::Field(f2, _)) => {
|
||||
if f1 == f2 {
|
||||
// same field (e.g. `a.y` vs. `a.y`) - recur.
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-OR-EQ-FIELD");
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let ty = pi1.base.ty(self.mir, self.tcx).to_ty(self.tcx);
|
||||
match ty.sty {
|
||||
ty::TyAdt(def, _) if def.is_union() => {
|
||||
// Different fields of a union, we are basically stuck.
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: STUCK-UNION");
|
||||
Overlap::Arbitrary
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
// Different fields of a struct (`a.x` vs. `a.y`). Disjoint!
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-FIELD");
|
||||
Overlap::Disjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Downcast(_, v1), ProjectionElem::Downcast(_, v2)) => {
|
||||
// different variants are treated as having disjoint fields,
|
||||
// even if they occupy the same "space", because it's
|
||||
// impossible for 2 variants of the same enum to exist
|
||||
// (and therefore, to be borrowed) at the same time.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that this is different from unions - we *do* allow
|
||||
// this code to compile:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
// fn foo(x: &mut Result<i32, i32>) {
|
||||
// let mut v = None;
|
||||
// if let Ok(ref mut a) = *x {
|
||||
// v = Some(a);
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// // here, you would *think* that the
|
||||
// // *entirety* of `x` would be borrowed,
|
||||
// // but in fact only the `Ok` variant is,
|
||||
// // so the `Err` variant is *entirely free*:
|
||||
// if let Err(ref mut a) = *x {
|
||||
// v = Some(a);
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// drop(v);
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// ```
|
||||
if v1 == v2 {
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-OR-EQ-FIELD");
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-FIELD");
|
||||
Overlap::Disjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Index(..), ProjectionElem::Index(..)) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Index(..), ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Index(..), ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }, ProjectionElem::Index(..)) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }, ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }, ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }, ProjectionElem::Index(..)) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }, ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }, ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }) => {
|
||||
// Array indexes (`a[0]` vs. `a[i]`). These can either be disjoint
|
||||
// (if the indexes differ) or equal (if they are the same), so this
|
||||
// is the recursive case that gives "equal *or* disjoint" its meaning.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that by construction, MIR at borrowck can't subdivide
|
||||
// `Subslice` accesses (e.g. `a[2..3][i]` will never be present) - they
|
||||
// are only present in slice patterns, and we "merge together" nested
|
||||
// slice patterns. That means we don't have to think about these. It's
|
||||
// probably a good idea to assert this somewhere, but I'm too lazy.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME(#8636) we might want to return Disjoint if
|
||||
// both projections are constant and disjoint.
|
||||
debug!("place_element_conflict: DISJOINT-OR-EQ-ARRAY");
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Deref, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Field(..), _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Index(..), _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Downcast(..), _) => {
|
||||
bug!("mismatched projections in place_element_conflict: {:?} and {:?}",
|
||||
|
||||
elem1, elem2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Place::Projection(_), _) |
|
||||
(_, Place::Projection(_)) => {
|
||||
bug!("unexpected elements in place_element_conflict: {:?} and {:?}",
|
||||
elem1, elem2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn borrow_conflicts_with_place(&mut self,
|
||||
borrow: &BorrowData<'tcx>,
|
||||
place: &Place<'tcx>,
|
||||
access: ShallowOrDeep)
|
||||
-> bool
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place({:?},{:?},{:?})", borrow, place, access);
|
||||
|
||||
// Return all the prefixes of `place` in reverse order, including
|
||||
// downcasts.
|
||||
fn place_elements<'a, 'tcx>(place: &'a Place<'tcx>) -> Vec<&'a Place<'tcx>>
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut result = vec![];
|
||||
let mut place = place;
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
result.push(place);
|
||||
match place {
|
||||
Place::Projection(interior) => {
|
||||
place = &interior.base;
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
result.reverse();
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let borrow_components = place_elements(&borrow.place);
|
||||
let access_components = place_elements(place);
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: components {:?} / {:?}",
|
||||
borrow_components, access_components);
|
||||
|
||||
let borrow_components = borrow_components.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(Some).chain(iter::repeat(None));
|
||||
let access_components = access_components.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(Some).chain(iter::repeat(None));
|
||||
// The borrowck rules for proving disjointness are applied from the "root" of the
|
||||
// borrow forwards, iterating over "similar" projections in lockstep until
|
||||
// we can prove overlap one way or another. Essentially, we treat `Overlap` as
|
||||
// a monoid and report a conflict if the product ends up not being `Disjoint`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// At each step, if we didn't run out of borrow or place, we know that our elements
|
||||
// have the same type, and that they only overlap if they are the identical.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// For example, if we are comparing these:
|
||||
// BORROW: (*x1[2].y).z.a
|
||||
// ACCESS: (*x1[i].y).w.b
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Then our steps are:
|
||||
// x1 | x1 -- places are the same
|
||||
// x1[2] | x1[i] -- equal or disjoint (disjoint if indexes differ)
|
||||
// x1[2].y | x1[i].y -- equal or disjoint
|
||||
// *x1[2].y | *x1[i].y -- equal or disjoint
|
||||
// (*x1[2].y).z | (*x1[i].y).w -- we are disjoint and don't need to check more!
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Because `zip` does potentially bad things to the iterator inside, this loop
|
||||
// also handles the case where the access might be a *prefix* of the borrow, e.g.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// BORROW: (*x1[2].y).z.a
|
||||
// ACCESS: x1[i].y
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Then our steps are:
|
||||
// x1 | x1 -- places are the same
|
||||
// x1[2] | x1[i] -- equal or disjoint (disjoint if indexes differ)
|
||||
// x1[2].y | x1[i].y -- equal or disjoint
|
||||
//
|
||||
// -- here we run out of access - the borrow can access a part of it. If this
|
||||
// is a full deep access, then we *know* the borrow conflicts with it. However,
|
||||
// if the access is shallow, then we can proceed:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// x1[2].y | (*x1[i].y) -- a deref! the access can't get past this, so we
|
||||
// are disjoint
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Our invariant is, that at each step of the iteration:
|
||||
// - If we didn't run out of access to match, our borrow and access are comparable
|
||||
// and either equal or disjoint.
|
||||
// - If we did run out of accesss, the borrow can access a part of it.
|
||||
for (borrow_c, access_c) in borrow_components.zip(access_components) {
|
||||
// loop invariant: borrow_c is always either equal to access_c or disjoint from it.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: {:?} vs. {:?}", borrow_c, access_c);
|
||||
match (borrow_c, access_c) {
|
||||
(None, _) => {
|
||||
// If we didn't run out of access, the borrow can access all of our
|
||||
// place (e.g. a borrow of `a.b` with an access to `a.b.c`),
|
||||
// so we have a conflict.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If we did, then we still know that the borrow can access a *part*
|
||||
// of our place that our access cares about (a borrow of `a.b.c`
|
||||
// with an access to `a.b`), so we still have a conflict.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME: Differs from AST-borrowck; includes drive-by fix
|
||||
// to #38899. Will probably need back-compat mode flag.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflict_with_place: full borrow, CONFLICT");
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Some(borrow_c), None) => {
|
||||
// We know that the borrow can access a part of our place. This
|
||||
// is a conflict if that is a part our access cares about.
|
||||
|
||||
let (base, elem) = match borrow_c {
|
||||
Place::Projection(box Projection { base, elem }) => (base, elem),
|
||||
_ => bug!("place has no base?")
|
||||
};
|
||||
let base_ty = base.ty(self.mir, self.tcx).to_ty(self.tcx);
|
||||
|
||||
match (elem, &base_ty.sty, access) {
|
||||
(_, _, Shallow(Some(ArtificialField::Discriminant))) |
|
||||
(_, _, Shallow(Some(ArtificialField::ArrayLength))) => {
|
||||
// The discriminant and array length are like
|
||||
// additional fields on the type; they do not
|
||||
// overlap any existing data there. Furthermore,
|
||||
// they cannot actually be a prefix of any
|
||||
// borrowed place (at least in MIR as it is
|
||||
// currently.)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// e.g. a (mutable) borrow of `a[5]` while we read the
|
||||
// array length of `a`.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: implicit field");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Deref, _, Shallow(None)) => {
|
||||
// e.g. a borrow of `*x.y` while we shallowly access `x.y` or some
|
||||
// prefix thereof - the shallow access can't touch anything behind
|
||||
// the pointer.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: shallow access behind ptr");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Deref, ty::TyRef(_, ty::TypeAndMut {
|
||||
ty: _, mutbl: hir::MutImmutable
|
||||
}), _) => {
|
||||
// the borrow goes through a dereference of a shared reference.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// I'm not sure why we are tracking these borrows - shared
|
||||
// references can *always* be aliased, which means the
|
||||
// permission check already account for this borrow.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: behind a shared ref");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Deref, _, Deep) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Field { .. }, _, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Index { ..}, _, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::ConstantIndex { .. }, _, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Subslice { .. }, _, _) |
|
||||
(ProjectionElem::Downcast { .. }, _, _) => {
|
||||
// Recursive case. This can still be disjoint on a
|
||||
// further iteration if this a shallow access and
|
||||
// there's a deref later on, e.g. a borrow
|
||||
// of `*x.y` while accessing `x`.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Some(borrow_c), Some(access_c)) => {
|
||||
match self.place_element_conflict(&borrow_c, access_c) {
|
||||
Overlap::Arbitrary => {
|
||||
// We have encountered different fields of potentially
|
||||
// the same union - the borrow now partially overlaps.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// There is no *easy* way of comparing the fields
|
||||
// further on, because they might have different types
|
||||
// (e.g. borrows of `u.a.0` and `u.b.y` where `.0` and
|
||||
// `.y` come from different structs).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We could try to do some things here - e.g. count
|
||||
// dereferences - but that's probably not a good
|
||||
// idea, at least for now, so just give up and
|
||||
// report a conflict. This is unsafe code anyway so
|
||||
// the user could always use raw pointers.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: arbitrary -> conflict");
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Overlap::EqualOrDisjoint => {
|
||||
// This is the recursive case - proceed to the next element.
|
||||
}
|
||||
Overlap::Disjoint => {
|
||||
// We have proven the borrow disjoint - further
|
||||
// projections will remain disjoint.
|
||||
debug!("borrow_conflicts_with_place: disjoint");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
unreachable!("iter::repeat returned None")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn each_borrow_involving_path<F>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
_context: Context,
|
||||
|
@ -1486,7 +1835,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
flow_state: &InProgress<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
mut op: F,
|
||||
) where
|
||||
F: FnMut(&mut Self, BorrowIndex, &BorrowData<'tcx>, &Place<'tcx>) -> Control,
|
||||
F: FnMut(&mut Self, BorrowIndex, &BorrowData<'tcx>) -> Control,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let (access, place) = access_place;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1501,47 +1850,9 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
'next_borrow: for i in flow_state.borrows.elems_incoming() {
|
||||
let borrowed = &data[i];
|
||||
|
||||
// Is `place` (or a prefix of it) already borrowed? If
|
||||
// so, that's relevant.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FIXME: Differs from AST-borrowck; includes drive-by fix
|
||||
// to #38899. Will probably need back-compat mode flag.
|
||||
for accessed_prefix in self.prefixes(place, PrefixSet::All) {
|
||||
if *accessed_prefix == borrowed.place {
|
||||
// FIXME: pass in enum describing case we are in?
|
||||
let ctrl = op(self, i, borrowed, accessed_prefix);
|
||||
if ctrl == Control::Break {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Is `place` a prefix (modulo access type) of the
|
||||
// `borrowed.place`? If so, that's relevant.
|
||||
|
||||
let prefix_kind = match access {
|
||||
Shallow(Some(ArtificialField::Discriminant)) |
|
||||
Shallow(Some(ArtificialField::ArrayLength)) => {
|
||||
// The discriminant and array length are like
|
||||
// additional fields on the type; they do not
|
||||
// overlap any existing data there. Furthermore,
|
||||
// they cannot actually be a prefix of any
|
||||
// borrowed place (at least in MIR as it is
|
||||
// currently.)
|
||||
continue 'next_borrow;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Shallow(None) => PrefixSet::Shallow,
|
||||
Deep => PrefixSet::Supporting,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
for borrowed_prefix in self.prefixes(&borrowed.place, prefix_kind) {
|
||||
if borrowed_prefix == place {
|
||||
// FIXME: pass in enum describing case we are in?
|
||||
let ctrl = op(self, i, borrowed, borrowed_prefix);
|
||||
if ctrl == Control::Break {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if self.borrow_conflicts_with_place(borrowed, place, access) {
|
||||
let ctrl = op(self, i, borrowed);
|
||||
if ctrl == Control::Break { return; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1595,6 +1906,7 @@ mod prefixes {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
pub(super) enum PrefixSet {
|
||||
/// Doesn't stop until it returns the base case (a Local or
|
||||
/// Static prefix).
|
||||
|
@ -1907,17 +2219,11 @@ impl<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
|||
fn report_conflicting_borrow(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
context: Context,
|
||||
common_prefix: &Place<'tcx>,
|
||||
(place, span): (&Place<'tcx>, Span),
|
||||
gen_borrow_kind: BorrowKind,
|
||||
issued_borrow: &BorrowData,
|
||||
end_issued_loan_span: Option<Span>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
use self::prefixes::IsPrefixOf;
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(common_prefix.is_prefix_of(place));
|
||||
assert!(common_prefix.is_prefix_of(&issued_borrow.place));
|
||||
|
||||
let issued_span = self.retrieve_borrow_span(issued_borrow);
|
||||
|
||||
let new_closure_span = self.find_closure_span(span, context.loc);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
|
|||
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
|
||||
// except according to those terms.
|
||||
|
||||
// ignore-test will be fixed later
|
||||
// revisions: ast mir
|
||||
//[mir]compile-flags: -Z borrowck=mir
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ fn main() {
|
|||
{
|
||||
let ra = &u.a;
|
||||
let rmb = &mut u.b; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot borrow `u` (via `u.b`) as mutable because `u` is also borrowed as immutable (via `u.a`)
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (needs support for union)
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR cannot borrow `u.b` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
let ra = &u.a;
|
||||
u.b = 1; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot assign to `u.b` because it is borrowed
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (needs support for union)
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR cannot assign to `u.b` because it is borrowed
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Mut borrow, same field
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -84,22 +84,23 @@ fn main() {
|
|||
{
|
||||
let rma = &mut u.a;
|
||||
let rb = &u.b; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot borrow `u` (via `u.b`) as immutable because `u` is also borrowed as mutable (via `u.a`)
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (needs support for union)
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR cannot borrow `u.b` as immutable because it is also borrowed as mutable
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
let ra = &mut u.a;
|
||||
let b = u.b; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot use `u.b` because it was mutably borrowed
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (needs support for union)
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR cannot use `u.b` because it was mutably borrowed
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
let rma = &mut u.a;
|
||||
let rmb2 = &mut u.b; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot borrow `u` (via `u.b`) as mutable more than once at a time
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (needs support for union)
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR cannot borrow `u.b` as mutable more than once at a time
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
let rma = &mut u.a;
|
||||
u.b = 1; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot assign to `u.b` because it is borrowed
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (needs support for union)
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR cannot assign to `u.b` because it is borrowed
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
|||
|
||||
// Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
|
||||
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
|
||||
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
|
||||
|
@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ fn main() {
|
|||
println!("t[0]: {}", t[0]);
|
||||
a[2] = 0; //[ast]~ ERROR cannot assign to `a[..]` because it is borrowed
|
||||
//[cmp]~^ ERROR cannot assign to `a[..]` because it is borrowed (Ast)
|
||||
// FIXME Error for MIR (error missed)
|
||||
//[cmp]~| ERROR cannot assign to `a[..]` because it is borrowed (Mir)
|
||||
println!("t[0]: {}", t[0]);
|
||||
t[0];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ fn causes_ice(mut l: &mut Sexpression) {
|
|||
//[mir]~| ERROR [E0499]
|
||||
l = &mut **expr; //[ast]~ ERROR [E0506]
|
||||
//[mir]~^ ERROR [E0506]
|
||||
//[mir]~| ERROR [E0506]
|
||||
//[mir]~| ERROR [E0499]
|
||||
//[mir]~| ERROR [E0506]
|
||||
//[mir]~| ERROR [E0499]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue