Auto merge of #89489 - FabianWolff:issue-89485, r=oli-obk
Fix unsound optimization with explicit variant discriminants Fixes #89485.
This commit is contained in:
commit
a4797664ba
2 changed files with 52 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -544,6 +544,12 @@ pub struct SimplifyBranchSame;
|
|||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for SimplifyBranchSame {
|
||||
fn run_pass(&self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
|
||||
// This optimization is disabled by default for now due to
|
||||
// soundness concerns; see issue #89485 and PR #89489.
|
||||
if !tcx.sess.opts.debugging_opts.unsound_mir_opts {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
trace!("Running SimplifyBranchSame on {:?}", body.source);
|
||||
let finder = SimplifyBranchSameOptimizationFinder { body, tcx };
|
||||
let opts = finder.find();
|
||||
|
@ -706,12 +712,24 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> SimplifyBranchSameOptimizationFinder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
let helper = |rhs: &Rvalue<'tcx>,
|
||||
place: &Place<'tcx>,
|
||||
variant_index: &VariantIdx,
|
||||
switch_value: u128,
|
||||
side_to_choose| {
|
||||
let place_type = place.ty(self.body, self.tcx).ty;
|
||||
let adt = match *place_type.kind() {
|
||||
ty::Adt(adt, _) if adt.is_enum() => adt,
|
||||
_ => return StatementEquality::NotEqual,
|
||||
};
|
||||
// We need to make sure that the switch value that targets the bb with
|
||||
// SetDiscriminant is the same as the variant discriminant.
|
||||
let variant_discr = adt.discriminant_for_variant(self.tcx, *variant_index).val;
|
||||
if variant_discr != switch_value {
|
||||
trace!(
|
||||
"NO: variant discriminant {} does not equal switch value {}",
|
||||
variant_discr,
|
||||
switch_value
|
||||
);
|
||||
return StatementEquality::NotEqual;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let variant_is_fieldless = adt.variants[*variant_index].fields.is_empty();
|
||||
if !variant_is_fieldless {
|
||||
trace!("NO: variant {:?} was not fieldless", variant_index);
|
||||
|
@ -740,20 +758,28 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> SimplifyBranchSameOptimizationFinder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|||
(
|
||||
StatementKind::Assign(box (_, rhs)),
|
||||
StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { place, variant_index },
|
||||
)
|
||||
// we need to make sure that the switch value that targets the bb with SetDiscriminant (y), is the same as the variant index
|
||||
if Some(variant_index.index() as u128) == y_target_and_value.value => {
|
||||
) if y_target_and_value.value.is_some() => {
|
||||
// choose basic block of x, as that has the assign
|
||||
helper(rhs, place, variant_index, x_target_and_value.target)
|
||||
helper(
|
||||
rhs,
|
||||
place,
|
||||
variant_index,
|
||||
y_target_and_value.value.unwrap(),
|
||||
x_target_and_value.target,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
(
|
||||
StatementKind::SetDiscriminant { place, variant_index },
|
||||
StatementKind::Assign(box (_, rhs)),
|
||||
)
|
||||
// we need to make sure that the switch value that targets the bb with SetDiscriminant (x), is the same as the variant index
|
||||
if Some(variant_index.index() as u128) == x_target_and_value.value => {
|
||||
) if x_target_and_value.value.is_some() => {
|
||||
// choose basic block of y, as that has the assign
|
||||
helper(rhs, place, variant_index, y_target_and_value.target)
|
||||
helper(
|
||||
rhs,
|
||||
place,
|
||||
variant_index,
|
||||
x_target_and_value.value.unwrap(),
|
||||
y_target_and_value.target,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
trace!("NO: statements `{:?}` and `{:?}` not considered equal", x, y);
|
||||
|
|
18
src/test/ui/mir/issue-89485.rs
Normal file
18
src/test/ui/mir/issue-89485.rs
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|||
// Regression test for issue #89485.
|
||||
|
||||
// run-pass
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub enum Type {
|
||||
A = 1,
|
||||
B = 2,
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn encode(v: Type) -> Type {
|
||||
match v {
|
||||
Type::A => Type::B,
|
||||
_ => v,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
assert_eq!(Type::B, encode(Type::A));
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue