typeck: there are only unboxed closures now

This commit is contained in:
Jorge Aparicio 2015-01-04 10:39:03 -05:00
parent 58b0d7479f
commit f258ee7d96

View file

@ -46,30 +46,17 @@ pub fn check_expr_closure<'a,'tcx>(fcx: &FnCtxt<'a,'tcx>,
// evidence than an unboxed closure is desired, we'll use
// that, otherwise we'll fall back to boxed closures.
match expected_sig_and_kind {
None => { // doesn't look like an unboxed closure
let region = astconv::opt_ast_region_to_region(fcx,
fcx,
expr.span,
&None);
None => { // don't have information about the kind, request explicit annotation
// HACK We still need to typeck the body, so assume `FnMut` kind just for that
let kind = ty::FnMutUnboxedClosureKind;
check_boxed_closure(fcx,
expr,
ty::RegionTraitStore(region, ast::MutMutable),
decl,
body,
expected);
check_unboxed_closure(fcx, expr, kind, decl, body, None);
match capture {
CaptureByValue => {
fcx.ccx.tcx.sess.span_err(
expr.span,
"boxed closures can't capture by value, \
if you want to use an unboxed closure, \
explicitly annotate its kind: e.g. `move |:|`");
},
CaptureByRef => {}
}
}
fcx.ccx.tcx.sess.span_err(
expr.span,
"Can't infer the \"kind\" of the closure, explicitly annotate it. e.g. \
`|&:| {}`");
},
Some((sig, kind)) => {
check_unboxed_closure(fcx, expr, kind, decl, body, Some(sig));
}
@ -254,91 +241,3 @@ fn deduce_unboxed_closure_expectations_from_obligations<'a,'tcx>(
None
}
fn check_boxed_closure<'a,'tcx>(fcx: &FnCtxt<'a,'tcx>,
expr: &ast::Expr,
store: ty::TraitStore,
decl: &ast::FnDecl,
body: &ast::Block,
expected: Expectation<'tcx>) {
let tcx = fcx.ccx.tcx;
// Find the expected input/output types (if any). Substitute
// fresh bound regions for any bound regions we find in the
// expected types so as to avoid capture.
let expected_cenv = expected.map_to_option(fcx, |ty| match ty.sty {
_ => None
});
let (expected_sig, expected_onceness, expected_bounds) = match expected_cenv {
Some(cenv) => {
let (sig, _) =
ty::replace_late_bound_regions(
tcx,
&cenv.sig,
|_, debruijn| fcx.inh.infcx.fresh_bound_region(debruijn));
let onceness = match (&store, &cenv.store) {
// As the closure type and onceness go, only three
// combinations are legit:
// once closure
// many closure
// once proc
// If the actual and expected closure type disagree with
// each other, set expected onceness to be always Once or
// Many according to the actual type. Otherwise, it will
// yield either an illegal "many proc" or a less known
// "once closure" in the error message.
(&ty::UniqTraitStore, &ty::UniqTraitStore) |
(&ty::RegionTraitStore(..), &ty::RegionTraitStore(..)) =>
cenv.onceness,
(&ty::UniqTraitStore, _) => ast::Once,
(&ty::RegionTraitStore(..), _) => ast::Many,
};
(Some(sig), onceness, cenv.bounds.clone())
}
_ => {
// Not an error! Means we're inferring the closure type
let region = fcx.infcx().next_region_var(
infer::AddrOfRegion(expr.span));
let bounds = ty::region_existential_bound(region);
let onceness = ast::Many;
(None, onceness, bounds)
}
};
// construct the function type
let fn_ty = astconv::ty_of_closure(fcx,
ast::Unsafety::Normal,
expected_onceness,
expected_bounds,
store,
decl,
abi::Rust,
expected_sig);
let fn_sig = fn_ty.sig.clone();
let fty = panic!("stub");
debug!("check_expr_fn fty={}", fcx.infcx().ty_to_string(fty));
fcx.write_ty(expr.id, fty);
// If the closure is a stack closure and hasn't had some non-standard
// style inferred for it, then check it under its parent's style.
// Otherwise, use its own
let (inherited_style, inherited_style_id) = match store {
ty::RegionTraitStore(..) => (fcx.ps.borrow().unsafety,
fcx.ps.borrow().def),
ty::UniqTraitStore => (ast::Unsafety::Normal, expr.id)
};
let fn_sig =
ty::liberate_late_bound_regions(tcx, CodeExtent::from_node_id(body.id), &fn_sig);
check_fn(fcx.ccx,
inherited_style,
inherited_style_id,
&fn_sig,
&*decl,
expr.id,
&*body,
fcx.inh);
}