Don't use zip
to compare iterators during pretty-print hack
If the right-hand iterator has exactly one more element than the left-hand iterator, then both iterators will be fully consumed, but the extra element will never be compared.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4eff9b0b29
commit
f5d71a9b3c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
|||
#![feature(bool_to_option)]
|
||||
#![feature(crate_visibility_modifier)]
|
||||
#![feature(bindings_after_at)]
|
||||
#![feature(iter_order_by)]
|
||||
#![feature(or_patterns)]
|
||||
|
||||
use rustc_ast as ast;
|
||||
|
@ -459,14 +460,10 @@ pub fn tokenstream_probably_equal_for_proc_macro(
|
|||
|
||||
// Break tokens after we expand any nonterminals, so that we break tokens
|
||||
// that are produced as a result of nonterminal expansion.
|
||||
let mut t1 = first.trees().filter(semantic_tree).flat_map(expand_nt).flat_map(break_tokens);
|
||||
let mut t2 = other.trees().filter(semantic_tree).flat_map(expand_nt).flat_map(break_tokens);
|
||||
for (t1, t2) in t1.by_ref().zip(t2.by_ref()) {
|
||||
if !tokentree_probably_equal_for_proc_macro(&t1, &t2, sess) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
t1.next().is_none() && t2.next().is_none()
|
||||
let t1 = first.trees().filter(semantic_tree).flat_map(expand_nt).flat_map(break_tokens);
|
||||
let t2 = other.trees().filter(semantic_tree).flat_map(expand_nt).flat_map(break_tokens);
|
||||
|
||||
t1.eq_by(t2, |t1, t2| tokentree_probably_equal_for_proc_macro(&t1, &t2, sess))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// See comments in `Nonterminal::to_tokenstream` for why we care about
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue