Support return-type bounds on associated methods from supertraits
Support `T: Trait<method(): Bound>` when `method` comes from a supertrait, aligning it with the behavior of associated type bounds (both equality and trait bounds).
The only wrinkle is that I have to extend `super_predicates_that_define_assoc_type` to look for *all* items, not just `AssocKind::Ty`. This will also be needed to support `feature(associated_const_equality)` as well, which is subtly broken when it comes to supertraits, though this PR does not fix those yet. There's a slight chance there's a perf regression here, in which case I guess I could split it out into a separate query.
Use fulfillment to check `Drop` impl compatibility
Use an `ObligationCtxt` to ensure that a `Drop` impl does not have stricter requirements than the ADT that it's implemented for, rather than using a `SimpleEqRelation` to (more or less) syntactically equate predicates on an ADT with predicates on an impl.
r? types
### Some background
The old code reads:
```rust
// An earlier version of this code attempted to do this checking
// via the traits::fulfill machinery. However, it ran into trouble
// since the fulfill machinery merely turns outlives-predicates
// 'a:'b and T:'b into region inference constraints. It is simpler
// just to look for all the predicates directly.
```
I'm not sure what this means, but perhaps in the 8 years since that this comment was written (cc #23638) it's gotten easier to process region constraints after doing fulfillment? I don't know how this logic differs from anything we do in the `compare_impl_item` module. Ironically, later on it says:
```rust
// However, it may be more efficient in the future to batch
// the analysis together via the fulfill (see comment above regarding
// the usage of the fulfill machinery), rather than the
// repeated `.iter().any(..)` calls.
```
Also:
* Removes `SimpleEqRelation` which was far too syntactical in its relation.
* Fixes#110557
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls
Fixes#110858
It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
Implement negative bounds for internal testing purposes
Implements partial support the `!` negative polarity on trait bounds. This is incomplete, but should allow us to at least be able to play with the feature.
Not even gonna consider them as a public-facing feature, but I'm implementing them because would've been nice to have in UI tests, for example in #110671.
Currently a `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` can be created from any type that
impls `Into<String>`. That includes `&str`, `String`, and `Cow<'static,
str>`, which are reasonable. It also includes `&String`, which is pretty
weird, and results in many places making unnecessary allocations for
patterns like this:
```
self.fatal(&format!(...))
```
This creates a string with `format!`, takes a reference, passes the
reference to `fatal`, which does an `into()`, which clones the
reference, doing a second allocation. Two allocations for a single
string, bleh.
This commit changes the `From` impls so that you can only create a
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` from `&str`, `String`, or `Cow<'static,
str>`. This requires changing all the places that currently create one
from a `&String`. Most of these are of the `&format!(...)` form
described above; each one removes an unnecessary static `&`, plus an
allocation when executed. There are also a few places where the existing
use of `&String` was more reasonable; these now just use `clone()` at
the call site.
As well as making the code nicer and more efficient, this is a step
towards possibly using `Cow<'static, str>` in
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}`. That would require changing
the `From<&'a str>` impls to `From<&'static str>`, which is doable, but
I'm not yet sure if it's worthwhile.
Fix elaboration with associated type bounds
When computing a trait's supertrait predicates, do not add any associated type *trait* bounds to that list of supertrait predicates. This is because supertrait predicates are expected to have the same `Self` type as the trait.
For example, given:
```rust
trait Foo: Bar<Assoc: Send>
```
Before, we would compute that the supertrait predicates of `T: Foo` are `T: Bar` and `<T as Bar>::Assoc: Send`. However, the last bound is a trait predicate for a totally different type than `T`, and existing code that uses supertrait bounds such as vtable construction, closure fn signature deduction, etc. all rely on the invariant that we have a list of predicates for self type `T`.
Fixes#76593
The reason for all the extra diagnostic noise is that we're recomputing predicates with a different filter now. These diagnostics should be deduplicated for any end-user though.
---
This does bring up an interesting question -- is the predicate `<T as Bar>::Assoc: Send` an implied bound of `T: Foo`? Because currently the only bounds implied by a (non-alias) trait are its supertraits. I guess I could fix this too, but it would require even more changes, and I'm inclined to punt this question along.
Add `ConstParamTy` trait
This is a bit sketch, but idk.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Yet to be done:
- [x] ~~Figure out if it's okay to implement `StructuralEq` for primitives / possibly remove their special casing~~ (it should be okay, but maybe not in this PR...)
- [ ] Maybe refactor the code a little bit
- [x] Use a macro to make impls a bit nicer
Future work:
- [ ] Actually™ use the trait when checking if a `const` generic type is allowed
- [ ] _Really_ refactor the surrounding code
- [ ] Refactor `marker.rs` into multiple modules for each "theme" of markers
Use MIR's `Offset` for pointer `add` too
~~Status: draft while waiting for #110822 to land, since this is built atop that.~~
~~r? `@ghost~~`
Canonical Rust code has mostly moved to `add`/`sub` on pointers, which take `usize`, instead of `offset` which takes `isize`. (And, relatedly, when `sub_ptr` was added it turned out it replaced every single in-tree use of `offset_from`, because `usize` is just so much more useful than `isize` in Rust.)
Unfortunately, `intrinsics::offset` could only accept `*const` and `isize`, so there's a *huge* amount of type conversions back and forth being done. They're identity conversions in the backend, but still end up producing quite a lot of unhelpful MIR.
This PR changes `intrinsics::offset` to accept `*const` *and* `*mut` along with `isize` *and* `usize`. Conveniently, the backends and CTFE already handle this, since MIR's `BinOp::Offset` [already supports all four combinations](adaac6b166/compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/validate.rs (L523-L528)).
To demonstrate the difference, I added some `mir-opt/pre-codegen/` tests around slice indexing. Here's the difference to `[T]::get_mut`, since it uses `<*mut _>::add` internally:
```diff
`@@` -79,30 +70,21 `@@` fn slice_get_mut_usize(_1: &mut [u32], _2: usize) -> Option<&mut u32> {
StorageLive(_12); // scope 3 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/index.rs:LL:COL
StorageLive(_9); // scope 6 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/index.rs:LL:COL
_9 = _8 as *mut u32 (PtrToPtr); // scope 11 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- StorageLive(_13); // scope 13 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- _13 = _2 as isize (IntToInt); // scope 13 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- StorageLive(_14); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- StorageLive(_15); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- _15 = _9 as *const u32 (Pointer(MutToConstPointer)); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- _14 = Offset(move _15, _13); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- StorageDead(_15); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- _7 = move _14 as *mut u32 (PtrToPtr); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- StorageDead(_14); // scope 15 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
- StorageDead(_13); // scope 13 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
+ _7 = Offset(_9, _2); // scope 13 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/ptr/mut_ptr.rs:LL:COL
StorageDead(_9); // scope 6 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/index.rs:LL:COL
StorageDead(_12); // scope 3 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/index.rs:LL:COL
StorageDead(_11); // scope 3 at $SRC_DIR/core/src/slice/index.rs:LL:COL
```
1c1c8e442a (diff-a841b6a4538657add3f39bc895744331453d0625e7aace128b1f604f0b63c8fdR80)
Add lint to deny diagnostics composed of static strings
r? ghost
I'm hoping to have a lint that semi-automatically converts simple diagnostics such as `struct_span_err(span, "msg").help("msg").span_note(span2, "msg").emit()` to typed session diagnostics. It's quite hacky and not entirely working because of problems with `x fix` but should hopefully help reduce some of the work.
I'm going to start trying to apply what I can from this, but opening this as a draft in case anyone wants to develop on it.
cc #100717
Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `explicit_item_bounds`
Part of the work to finish https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105779.
This PR adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `explicit_item_bounds` query and removes `bound_explicit_item_bounds`.
r? `@compiler-errors` (hope it's okay to request you, since you reviewed #110299 and #110498😃)
Add `intrinsics::transmute_unchecked`
This takes a whole 3 lines in `compiler/` since it lowers to `CastKind::Transmute` in MIR *exactly* the same as the existing `intrinsics::transmute` does, it just doesn't have the fancy checking in `hir_typeck`.
Added to enable experimenting with the request in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106281#issuecomment-1496648190> and because the portable-simd folks might be interested for dependently-sized array-vector conversions.
It also simplifies a couple places in `core`.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108442#issuecomment-1474777273, where `CastKind::Transmute` was added having exactly these semantics before the lang meeting (which I wasn't in) independently expressed interest.
This takes a whole 3 lines in `compiler/` since it lowers to `CastKind::Transmute` in MIR *exactly* the same as the existing `intrinsics::transmute` does, it just doesn't have the fancy checking in `hir_typeck`.
Added to enable experimenting with the request in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106281#issuecomment-1496648190> and because the portable-simd folks might be interested for dependently-sized array-vector conversions.
It also simplifies a couple places in `core`.
