Stop inverting expectation in normalization errors
We have some funky special case logic to invert the expectation and actual type for normalization errors depending on their cause code. IMO most of the error messages get better, except for `try {}` blocks' type expectations. I think that these need to be special cased in some other way, rather than via this hack.
Fixes#131763
Make sure that outer opaques capture inner opaques's lifetimes even with precise capturing syntax
When lowering an opaque, we must capture and duplicate all of the lifetimes in the opaque's bounds to correctly lower the opaque's bounds. We do this *even if* the lifetime is not captured according to the `+ use<>` precise capturing bound; in that case, we will later reject that captured lifetime. For example, Given an opaque like `impl Sized + 'a + use<>`, we will still duplicate `'a` but later error that it is not mentioned in the `use<>` bound.
The current heuristic was not properly handling cases like:
```
//@ edition: 2024
fn foo<'a>() -> impl Trait<Assoc = impl Trait2> + use<> {}
```
Which forces the outer `impl Trait` to capture `'a` since `impl Trait2` *implicitly* captures `'a` due to the new lifetime capture rules for edition 2024. We were only capturing lifetimes syntactically mentioned in the bounds. (Note that this still is an error; we just need to capture `'a` so it is handled later in the compiler correctly -- hence the ICE in #131769 where a late-bound lifetime was being referenced outside of its binder).
This PR reworks the way we collect lifetimes to capture and duplicate in AST lowering to fix this.
Fixes#131769
warn less about non-exhaustive in ffi
Bindgen allows generating `#[non_exhaustive] #[repr(u32)]` enums. This results in nonintuitive nonlocal `improper_ctypes` warnings, even when the types are otherwise perfectly valid in C.
Adjust for actual tooling expectations by avoiding warning on simple enums with only unit variants.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116831
Migrate `llvm::set_comdat` and `llvm::SetUniqueComdat` to LLVM-C FFI.
Note, now we can call `llvm::set_comdat` only when the target actually
supports adding comdat. As this has no convenient LLVM-C API, we
implement this as `TargetOptions::supports_comdat`.
Co-authored-by: Stuart Cook <Zalathar@users.noreply.github.com>
This allows the public `rustdoc-types` crate to expose this feature
easily and allows consumers of the crate to get the performance
advantages from doing so.
The reasoning for this was discussed on [Zulip][1]
Changes:
- Make `rustc-hash` optional but default to including it
- Rename all occurrences of `FxHashMap` to `HashMap`.
- Feature gate the import and rename the imported `FxHashMap` to
`HashMap`
- Introduce a type alias `FxHashMap` which resolves to the currently
used `HashMap` (`rustc_hash::FxHashMap` or
`std::collections::HashMap`) for use in `src/librustdoc`.
[1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/rustc-hash.20and.20performance.20of.20rustdoc-types
zero-sized accesses are fine on null pointers
We entirely forgot to update all the function docs when changing the central docs. That's the problem with helpfully repeating shared definitions in tons of places...
small interpreter error cleanup
- Add `InterpretResult::map_err_kind` for the common case of swapping out the error kind (while preserving the backtrace pointing to the original error source)
- Rename `InterpError` -> `InterpErrorKind` to be consistent with the `kind` field name, and make it more clear that this is not the final error type
rustdoc: Switch from FxHash to sha256 for static file hashing.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129533#issuecomment-2422891519
fxhash isn't well defined, and it's implementation is being changed in #129533. But because rustdoc uses it for static files (and encodes that hashing in rustdoc.css), this broke our tests. Given that this isn't performace critical, I think the right fix is to used a well-defined hash that will never change its definition. I've picked (rather arbitrarily) sha256.
Update `use` keyword docs to describe precise capturing
I noticed that the standard library keyword docs for the `use` keyword haven't been updated yet to describe the new precise capturing syntax.
bootstrap: allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml
Allow setting `--jobs` in config.toml's `[build]` section.
```toml
[build]
jobs = 0
```
If this is unset or set to zero in config.toml, we look at `--jobs` flag. If that is also unset, then we fallback to `std:🧵:available_parallelism`. If that is not available, then we default to `1`. The flags and `available_parallelism` fallback are already setup, this PR just adds a config.toml option to wire that up.
Closes#131836.
r? bootstrap
Return values larger than 2 registers using a return area pointer
LLVM and Cranelift disagree about how to return values that don't fit in the registers designated for return values. LLVM will force the entire return value to be passed by return area pointer, while Cranelift will look at each IR level return value independently and decide to pass it in a register or not, which would result in the return value being passed partially in registers and partially through a return area pointer.
While Cranelift may need to be fixed as the LLVM behavior is generally more correct with respect to the surface language, forcing this behavior in rustc itself makes it easier for other backends to conform to the Rust ABI and for the C ABI rustc already handles this behavior anyway.
In addition LLVM's decision to pass the return value in registers or using a return area pointer depends on how exactly the return type is lowered to an LLVM IR type. For example `Option<u128>` can be lowered as `{ i128, i128 }` in which case the x86_64 backend would use a return area pointer, or it could be passed as `{ i32, i128 }` in which case the x86_64 backend would pass it in registers by taking advantage of an LLVM ABI extension that allows using 3 registers for the x86_64 sysv call conv rather than the officially specified 2 registers.
This adjustment is only necessary for the Rust ABI as for other ABI's the calling convention implementations in rustc_target already ensure any return value which doesn't fit in the available amount of return registers is passed in the right way for the current target.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/issues/1525
cc https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/9250
Make `profiler_builtins` an optional dependency of sysroot, not std
This avoids unnecessary rebuilds of std (and the compiler) when `build.profiler` is toggled off or on.
Fixes#131812.
---
Background: The `profiler_builtins` crate has been an optional dependency of std (behind a cargo feature) ever since it was added back in #42433. But as far as I can tell that has only ever been a convenient way to force the crate to be built, not a genuine dependency.
The side-effect of this false dependency is that toggling `build.profiler` causes a rebuild of std and the compiler, which shouldn't be necessary. This PR therefore makes `profiler_builtins` an optional dependency of the dummy sysroot crate (#108865), rather than a dependency of std.
What makes this change so small is that all of the necessary infrastructure already exists. Previously, bootstrap would enable the `profiler` feature on the sysroot crate, which would forward that feature to std. Now, enabling that feature directly enables sysroot's `profiler_builtins` dependency instead.
---
I believe this is more of a bootstrap change than a libs change, so tentatively:
r? bootstrap
Update cargo
7 commits in 8c30ce53688e25f7e9d860b33cc914fb2957ca9a..cf53cc54bb593b5ec3dc2be4b1702f50c36d24d5
2024-10-15 16:43:16 +0000 to 2024-10-18 13:56:15 +0000
- feat: Stabilize MSRV-aware resolver config (rust-lang/cargo#14639)
- Help with `[patch.crates.io]` (rust-lang/cargo#14700)
- test: Migrate publish snapshotting to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14642)
- Bump to 0.85.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#14695)
- Fix typo in faq.md (rust-lang/cargo#14696)
- fix(registry): `HttpRegistry` `block_until_ready` returns early when work is still pending (rust-lang/cargo#14694)
- fix(resolver): avoid cloning when iterating using RcVecIter (rust-lang/cargo#14690)
Clippy subtree update
One day late with the sync, as I was sick yesterday.
Cargo.lock update includes Clippy version bump and some deps cleanup we did in Clippy to match more versions used in the Rust repo.
r? `@Manishearth`
- Since in almost all cases, there will only be 1 UEFI shell, share the
shell handle between all functions that require it.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126207 (std::unix::stack_overflow::drop_handler addressing todo through libc …)
- #131864 (Never emit `vptr` for empty/auto traits)
- #131870 (compiletest: Store test collection context/state in two structs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup