Introduce `AliasKind::Inherent` for inherent associated types
Allows us to check (possibly generic) inherent associated types for well-formedness.
Type inference now also works properly.
Follow-up to #105961. Supersedes #108430.
Fixes#106722.
Fixes#108957.
Fixes#109768.
Fixes#109789.
Fixes#109790.
~Not to be merged before #108860 (`AliasKind::Weak`).~
CC `@jackh726`
r? `@compiler-errors`
`@rustbot` label T-types F-inherent_associated_types
Emit while_true lint spanning the entire loop condition
The lint that suggests `loop {}` instead of `while true {}` has functionality to 'pierce' parenthesis in cases like `while (true) {}`. In these cases, the emitted span only went to the hi of the `true` itself, not spanning the entire loop condition.
Before:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
After:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
This is especially a problem for rustfix.
added TraitAlias to check_item() for missing_docs
As in issue #111025 the `missing_docs` was not being triggered for trait aliases. I added `TraitAlias` to the pattern match for check_item(), and the lint seems to be behaving appropriately
The lint that suggests `loop {}` instead of `while true {}` has functionality to 'pierce' parenthesis
in cases like `while (true) {}`. In these cases, the emitted span only went to the hi of the `true`
itself, not spanning the entire loop condition.
Before:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
After:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
This is done to simplify to relationship between names() and values()
but also make thing clearer (having an Any to represent that any values
are allowed) but also to allow the (none) + values expected cases that
wasn't possible before.
Currently a `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` can be created from any type that
impls `Into<String>`. That includes `&str`, `String`, and `Cow<'static,
str>`, which are reasonable. It also includes `&String`, which is pretty
weird, and results in many places making unnecessary allocations for
patterns like this:
```
self.fatal(&format!(...))
```
This creates a string with `format!`, takes a reference, passes the
reference to `fatal`, which does an `into()`, which clones the
reference, doing a second allocation. Two allocations for a single
string, bleh.
This commit changes the `From` impls so that you can only create a
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` from `&str`, `String`, or `Cow<'static,
str>`. This requires changing all the places that currently create one
from a `&String`. Most of these are of the `&format!(...)` form
described above; each one removes an unnecessary static `&`, plus an
allocation when executed. There are also a few places where the existing
use of `&String` was more reasonable; these now just use `clone()` at
the call site.
As well as making the code nicer and more efficient, this is a step
towards possibly using `Cow<'static, str>` in
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}`. That would require changing
the `From<&'a str>` impls to `From<&'static str>`, which is doable, but
I'm not yet sure if it's worthwhile.
Add lint to deny diagnostics composed of static strings
r? ghost
I'm hoping to have a lint that semi-automatically converts simple diagnostics such as `struct_span_err(span, "msg").help("msg").span_note(span2, "msg").emit()` to typed session diagnostics. It's quite hacky and not entirely working because of problems with `x fix` but should hopefully help reduce some of the work.
I'm going to start trying to apply what I can from this, but opening this as a draft in case anyone wants to develop on it.
cc #100717
Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `explicit_item_bounds`
Part of the work to finish https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105779.
This PR adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `explicit_item_bounds` query and removes `bound_explicit_item_bounds`.
r? `@compiler-errors` (hope it's okay to request you, since you reviewed #110299 and #110498😃)
fix lint regression in `non_upper_case_globals`
Fixes#110573
The issue also exists for inherent associated types (where I copied my impl from). `EarlyContext` is more involved to fix in this way, so I'll leave it be for now (note it's unstable so that's not urgent).
r? `@compiler-errors`
Add `rustc_fluent_macro` to decouple fluent from `rustc_macros`
Fluent, with all the icu4x it brings in, takes quite some time to compile. `fluent_messages!` is only needed in further downstream rustc crates, but is blocking more upstream crates like `rustc_index`. By splitting it out, we allow `rustc_macros` to be compiled earlier, which speeds up `x check compiler` by about 5 seconds (and even more after the needless dependency on `serde_json` is removed from `rustc_data_structures`).
Fluent, with all the icu4x it brings in, takes quite some time to
compile. `fluent_messages!` is only needed in further downstream rustc
crates, but is blocking more upstream crates like `rustc_index`. By
splitting it out, we allow `rustc_macros` to be compiled earlier, which
speeds up `x check compiler` by about 5 seconds (and even more after the
needless dependency on `serde_json` is removed from
`rustc_data_structures`).
Avoid a few locks
We can use atomics or datastructures tuned for specific access patterns instead of locks. This may be an improvement for parallel rustc, but it's mostly a cleanup making various datastructures only usable in the way they are used right now (append data, never mutate), instead of having a general purpose lock.
Do not suppress temporary_cstring_as_ptr in macros.
There isn't really a reason to skip the lint when part of the expression comes from an expansion.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94694
