Properly report error on `const gen fn`
Fixes#130232
Also removes some (what I thought were unused) functions, and fixes a bug in clippy where we considered `gen fn` to be the same as `fn` because it was only built to consider asyncness.
Add test for S_OBJNAME & update test for LF_BUILDINFO cl and cmd
Update the unit test for checking cl and cmd in LF_BUILDINFO. With llvm-pdbutil we can now more specifically check if the string appears at the right location instead of just checking whether the string exists at all.
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96475
Fix default/minimum deployment target for Aarch64 simulator targets
The minimum that `rustc` encoded did not match [the version in Clang](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-18.1.8/llvm/lib/TargetParser/Triple.cpp#L1900-L1932), and that meant that that when linking, Clang ended up bumping the version. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129432 for more motivation behind this change.
Specifically, this PR sets the correct deployment target of the following targets:
- `aarch64-apple-ios-sim` from 10.0 to 14.0
- `aarch64-apple-tvos-sim` from 10.0 to 14.0
- `aarch64-apple-watchos-sim` from 5.0 to 7.0
- `aarch64-apple-ios-macabi` from 13.1 to 14.0
I have chosen not to document the `-sim` changes in the platform support docs, as it is fundamentally uninteresting; the normal targets (e.g. `aarch64-apple-ios`) still have the same deployment target, and that's what developers should actually target.
r? compiler
CC `@BlackHoleFox`
Pass deployment target when linking with CC on Apple targets
This PR effectively implements what's also being considered in the `cc` crate [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1030#issuecomment-2051020649), that is:
- When linking macOS targets with CC, pass the `-mmacosx-version-min=.` option to specify the desired deployment target. Also, no longer pass `-m32`/`-m64`, these are redundant since we already pass `-arch`.
- When linking with CC on iOS, tvOS, watchOS and visionOS, only pass `-target` (we assume for these targets that CC forwards to Clang).
This is required to get the linker to emit the correct `LC_BUILD_VERSION` of the final binary. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129432 for more motivation behind this change.
r? compiler
CC `@BlackHoleFox`
Add -Z small-data-threshold
This flag allows specifying the threshold size above which LLVM should not consider placing small objects in a `.sdata` or `.sbss` section.
Support is indicated in the target options via the
small-data-threshold-support target option, which can indicate either an
LLVM argument or an LLVM module flag. To avoid duplicate specifications
in a large number of targets, the default value for support is
DefaultForArch, which is translated to a concrete value according to the
target's architecture.
enable const-float-classify test, and test_next_up/down on 32bit x86
The test_next_up/down tests have been disabled on all 32bit x86 targets, which goes too far -- they should definitely work on our (tier 1) i686 target, it is only without SSE that we might run into trouble due to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114479. However, I cannot reproduce that trouble any more -- maybe that got fixed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123351?
The const-float-classify test relied on const traits "because we can", and got disabled when const traits got removed. That's an unfortunate reduction in test coverage of our float functionality, so let's restore the test in a way that does not rely on const traits.
The const-float tests are actually testing runtime behavior as well, and I don't think that runtime behavior is covered anywhere else. Probably they shouldn't be called "const-float", but we don't have a `tests/ui/float` folder... should I create one and move them there? Are there any other ui tests that should be moved there?
I also removed some FIXME referring to not use x87 for Rust-to-Rust-calls -- that has happened in #123351 so this got fixed indeed. Does that mean we can simplify all that float code again? I am not sure how to test it. Is running the test suite with an i586 target enough?
Cc ```@tgross35``` ```@workingjubilee```
Don't warn empty branches unreachable for now
The [stabilization](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122792) of `min_exhaustive_patterns` updated the `unreachable_pattern` lint to trigger on empty arms too. This has caused some amount of churn, and imposes an unjoyful `#[allow(unreachable_patterns)]` onto library authors who want to stay backwards-compatible.
While I think the lint should eventually cover these cases, for transition's sake I'd prefer to revert linting to what it was prior to stabilization, at least for now.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129031.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix false positive with `missing_docs` and `#[test]`
Since #130025, the compiler don't ignore missing_docs when compiling the tests. But there is now a false positive warning for every `#[test]`
For example, this code
```rust
//! Crate docs
fn just_a_test() {}
```
Would emit this warning when running `cargo test`
```
warning: missing documentation for a constant
--> src/lib.rs:5:1
|
4 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
5 | fn just_a_test() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`
Before this PR the `note` field was completely ignored for some reason, now it is shown (I think) correctly during the hir typechecking phase.
1. Report the `note` when specified in `diagnostic::on_unimplemented`
2. Added a test for unimplemented trait diagnostic
3. Added a test for custom unimplemented trait diagnostic
Close#130084
P.S. This is my first PR to rustc.
Suggest the correct pattern syntax on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant
Closes#126243
I add a suggestion on usage of unit variant pattern for a struct variant.
Since #130025, the compiler don't ignore missing_docs when compiling the tests.
But there is now a false positive warning for every `#[test]`
For example, this code
```rust
//! Crate docs
fn just_a_test() {}
```
Would emit this warning when running `cargo test`
```
warning: missing documentation for a constant
--> src/lib.rs:5:1
|
4 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
5 | fn just_a_test() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
generalize: track relevant info in cache key
This was previously theoretically incomplete as we could incorrectly generalize as if the type was in an invariant context even though we're in a covariant one. Similar with the `in_alias` flag.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Enumerate lint expectations using AttrId
This PR implements the idea I outlined in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127884#issuecomment-2240338547
We can uniquely identify a lint expectation `#[expect(lint0, lint1...)]` using the `AttrId` and the index of the lint inside the attribute. This PR uses this property in `check_expectations`.
In addition, this PR stops stashing expected diagnostics to wait for the unstable -> stable `LintExpectationId` mapping: if the lint is emitted with an unstable attribute, it must have been emitted by an `eval_always` query (like inside the resolver), so won't be loaded from cache. Decoding an `AttrId` from the on-disk cache ICEs, so we have no risk of accidentally checking an expectation.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127884
cc `@xFrednet`
This flag allows specifying the threshold size above which LLVM should
not consider placing small objects in a .sdata or .sbss section.
Support is indicated in the target options via the
small-data-threshold-support target option, which can indicate either an
LLVM argument or an LLVM module flag. To avoid duplicate specifications
in a large number of targets, the default value for support is
DefaultForArch, which is translated to a concrete value according to the
target's architecture.
abi/compatibility test: remove tests inside repr(C) wrappers
When I wrote the test I assumed we'd guarantee ABI compatibility to be "structural" wrt `repr(C)` types, i.e. if two `repr(C)` types have all their fields be pairwise ABI-compatible then the types are ABI-compatible. That got removed from the ABI compatibility docs before they landed, though, so let's also remove it from this test.
Also emit `missing_docs` lint with `--test` to fulfil expectations
This PR removes the "test harness" suppression of the `missing_docs` lint to be able to fulfil `#[expect]` (expectations) as it is now "relevant".
I think the goal was to maybe avoid false-positive while linting on public items under `#[cfg(test)]` but with effective visibility we should no longer have any false-positive.
Another possibility would be to query the lint level and only emit the lint if it's of expect level, but that is even more hacky.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130021
try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
rustdoc rfc#3662 changes under unstable flags
* All new functionality is under unstable options
* Adds `--merge=shared|none|finalize` flags
* Adds `--parts-out-dir=<crate specific directory>` for `--merge=none`
to write cross-crate info file for a single crate
* Adds `--include-parts-dir=<previously specified directory>` for
`--merge=finalize` to write cross-crate info files
* `tests/rustdoc/` tests for the new flags
bootstrap `naked_asm!` for `compiler-builtins`
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
parent PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128651
in this PR, `naked_asm!` is added as an alias for `asm!` with one difference: `options(noreturn)` is always enabled by `naked_asm!`. That makes it future-compatible for when `naked_asm!` starts disallowing `options(noreturn)` later.
The `naked_asm!` macro must be introduced first so that we can upgrade `compiler-builtins` to use it, and can then change the implementation of `naked_asm!` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128651
I've added some usages for `naked_asm!` in the tests, so we can be confident that it works, but I've left upgrading the whole test suite to the parent PR.
r? ``@Amanieu``
Inform the solver if evaluation is concurrent
Parallel compilation of a program can cause unexpected event sequencing. Inform the solver when this is true so it can skip invalid asserts.
Add test to build crates used by r-a on stable
r? ````````@Kobzol````````
I've opened other PRs for this one to work and they've landed already. I cherry-picked your commit, and added the last remaining pieces we needed I think.
Parallel compilation of a program can cause unexpected event sequencing.
Inform the solver when this is true so it can skip invalid asserts, then
assert replaced solutions are equal if Some
