Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Esteban Küber
f0c93117ed Use root obligation on E0277 for some cases
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that
tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root
obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for
the main message.

This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the
most specific case that just happened to fail, like  "char doesn't
implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`

The heuristics are:

 - the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type
   from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
 - the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid
   talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about
   `T: Trait` instead
 - the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in
   `tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
   |
LL |         .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
   |                             -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
   |                             |
   |                             required by a bound introduced by this call
   |
   = note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
   = note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
  --> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
   |
LL |         .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
   |                                      +
```

Fix #79359, fix #119983, fix #118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs
to change).
2024-03-03 18:53:35 +00:00
Esteban Küber
6efddac288 Provide more context on derived obligation error primary label
Expand the primary span of E0277 when the immediate unmet bound is not what the user wrote:

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Bar` is not satisfied
 --> f100.rs:6:6
  |
6 |     <i32 as Foo>::foo();
  |      ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `i32`, which is required by `i32: Foo`
  |
help: this trait has no implementations, consider adding one
 --> f100.rs:2:1
  |
2 | trait Bar {}
  | ^^^^^^^^^
note: required for `i32` to implement `Foo`
 --> f100.rs:3:14
  |
3 | impl<T: Bar> Foo for T {}
  |         ---  ^^^     ^
  |         |
  |         unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```

Fix #40120.
2024-01-30 21:28:18 +00:00
Esteban Küber
a9841936fe Deduplicate more sized errors on call exprs
Change the implicit `Sized` `Obligation` `Span` for call expressions to
include the whole expression. This aids the existing deduplication
machinery to reduce the number of errors caused by a single unsized
expression.
2024-01-24 02:53:15 +00:00
Nilstrieb
41e8d152dc Show number in error message even for one error
Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com>
2023-11-24 19:15:52 +01:00
David Tolnay
823bacb6e3
Revert "Suggest using Arc on !Send/!Sync types"
This reverts commit 9de1a472b6.
2023-08-28 03:16:48 -07:00
Esteban Kuber
9de1a472b6 Suggest using Arc on !Send/!Sync types 2023-08-09 14:04:10 +00:00
Esteban Küber
5b40aa5eb4 Tweak output for 'add line' suggestion 2023-04-12 22:50:10 +00:00
Ali MJ Al-Nasrawy
eea560494c oops! new unsoundness
Bless tests and show an introduced unsoundness related to
exits<'a> { forall<'b> { 'a == 'b } }.
We now resolve the var ?a in U0 to the placeholder !b in U1.
2023-03-05 12:49:01 +03:00
clubby789
885f9e72d7 Complete migrating ast_passes to derive diagnostics 2023-02-25 15:19:13 +00:00
Michael Goulet
9a39d7e441 Note predicate span on ImplDerivedObligation 2023-01-11 19:46:45 +00:00
Albert Larsan
cf2dff2b1e
Move /src/test to /tests 2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00