coverage: Rename `CodeRegion` to `SourceRegion`
LLVM uses the word "code" to refer to a particular kind of coverage mapping. This unrelated usage of the word is confusing, and makes it harder to introduce types whose names correspond to the LLVM classification of coverage kinds.
No functional changes.
Rename `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` to `TransmuteFrom`
As our implementation of MCP411 nears completion and we begin to solicit testing, it's no longer reasonable to expect testers to type or remember `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`. The name degrades the ease-of-reading of documentation, and the overall experience of using compiler safe transmute.
Tentatively, we'll instead adopt `TransmuteFrom`.
This name seems to be the one most likely to be stabilized, after discussion on Zulip [1]. We may want to revisit the ordering of `Src` and `Dst` before stabilization, at which point we'd likely consider `TransmuteInto` or `Transmute`.
[1] https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216762-project-safe-transmute/topic/What.20should.20.60BikeshedIntrinsicFrom.60.20be.20named.3F
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
r? `@compiler-errors`
interpret: do not make const-eval query result depend on tcx.sess
The check against calling functions with missing target features uses `tcx.sess` to determine which target features are available. However, this can differ between different crates in a crate graph, so the same const-eval query can come to different conclusions about whether a constant evaluates successfully or not -- which is bad, we should consistently get the same result everywhere.
const-eval: do not make UbChecks behavior depend on current crate's flags
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129552
Let's see if we can get away with just always enabling these checks.
ub_checks intrinsics: fall back to cfg(ub_checks)
Not sure why the fallback body uses `debug_assertions`, probably a leftover from when `cfg!(ub_checks)` did not exist yet?
r? `@saethlin`
add repr to the allowlist for naked functions
Fixes#129412 (combining unstable features #90957 (`#![feature(naked_functions)]`) and #82232 (`#![feature(fn_align)]`)
Tweak some attributes to improve panic_immediate_abort
This is similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117332; I did the same approach as before where I build a really big project with `-Zbuild-std -Zbuild-std-features=panic_immediate_abort` and grep its symbols for things that look panic-related.
LLVM uses the word "code" to refer to a particular kind of coverage mapping.
This unrelated usage of the word is confusing, and makes it harder to introduce
types whose names correspond to the LLVM classification of coverage kinds.
Get rid of `predicates_defined_on`
This is the uncontroversial part of #129532. This simply inlines the `predicates_defined_on` into into `predicates_of`. Nothing should change here logically.
Stop storing a special inner body for the coroutine by-move body for async closures
...and instead, just synthesize an item which is treated mostly normally by the MIR pipeline.
This PR does a few things:
* We synthesize a new `DefId` for the by-move body of a closure, which has its `mir_built` fed with the output of the `ByMoveBody` MIR transformation, and some other relevant queries.
* This has the `DefKind::ByMoveBody`, which we use to distinguish it from "real" bodies (that come from HIR) which need to be borrowck'd. Introduce `TyCtxt::is_synthetic_mir` to skip over `mir_borrowck` which is called by `mir_promoted`; borrowck isn't really possible to make work ATM since it heavily relies being called on a body generated from HIR, and is redundant by the construction of the by-move-body.
* Remove the special `PassManager` hacks for handling the inner `by_move_body` stored within the coroutine's mir body. Instead, this body is fed like a regular MIR body, so it's goes through all of the `tcx.*_mir` stages normally (build -> promoted -> ...etc... -> optimized) ✨.
* Remove the `InstanceKind::ByMoveBody` shim, since now we have a "regular" def id, we can just use `InstanceKind::Item`. This also allows us to remove the corresponding hacks from codegen, such as in `fn_sig_for_fn_abi` ✨.
Notable remarks:
* ~~I know it's kind of weird to be using `DefKind::Closure` here, since it's not a distinct closure but just a new MIR body. I don't believe it really matters, but I could also use a different `DefKind`... maybe one that we could use for synthetic MIR bodies in general?~~ edit: We're doing this now.
A partial stabilization that only affects:
- AllocType<T>::new_uninit
- AllocType<T>::assume_init
- AllocType<[T]>::new_uninit_slice
- AllocType<[T]>::assume_init
where "AllocType" is Box, Rc, or Arc
Fix typos in floating-point primitive type docs
Fixes a few typos. Also reflows the text of a couple of paragraphs in the source code to the standard line width to make the source easier to read (will have no effect on the rendered documentation).
exit: explain our expectations for the exit handlers registered in a Rust program
This documents the position of ``@Amanieu`` and others in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126600: a library with an atexit handler that destroys state that other threads could still be working on is buggy. We do not consider it acceptable for a library to say "you must call the following cleanup function before exiting from `main` or calling `exit`". I don't know if this is established ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` consensus so I presume this will have to go through FCP.
Given that Rust supports concurrency, I don't think there is any way to write a sound Rust wrapper around a library that has such a required cleanup function: even if we made `exit` unsafe, and the Rust wrapper used the scope-with-callback approach to ensure it can run cleanup code before returning from the wrapper (like `thread::scope`), one could still call this wrapper in a second thread and then return from `main` while the wrapper runs. Making this sound would require `std` to provide a way to "block" returning from `main`, so that while the wrapper runs returning from `main` waits until the wrapper is done... that just doesn't seem feasible.
The `exit` docs do not seem like the best place to document this, but I also couldn't think of a better one.
make it possible to enable const_precise_live_drops per-function
This makes const_precise_live_drops work with rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable so that we can stabilize individual functions that rely on const_precise_live_drops.
The goal is that we can use that to stabilize some of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67441 without having to stabilize const_precise_live_drops.
As our implementation of MCP411 nears completion and we begin to
solicit testing, it's no longer reasonable to expect testers to
type or remember `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`. The name degrades the
ease-of-reading of documentation, and the overall experience of
using compiler safe transmute.
Tentatively, we'll instead adopt `TransmuteFrom`.
This name seems to be the one most likely to be stabilized, after
discussion on Zulip [1]. We may want to revisit the ordering of
`Src` and `Dst` before stabilization, at which point we'd likely
consider `TransmuteInto` or `Transmute`.
[1] https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216762-project-safe-transmute/topic/What.20should.20.60BikeshedIntrinsicFrom.60.20be.20named.3F
When formatting generated code the xtask crate attempts to run `rustup run stable rustfmt`,
which fails if `rustup` is not installed. This results in test failures when another source manages
the compiler toolchain, for example when using Nix (or any other distro-specific packaging solution):
* xtask::codegen::grammar::test
* xtask::codegen::assists_doc_tests::test
With this commit xtask will first attempt to run `rustup run stable rustfmt`, and if that fails just
plain `rustfmt`. It still validates a stable version is being used.
This allows `cargo test` to pass on systems that do not use `rustup`.
