```
error[E0599]: no method named `map` found for struct `Vec<bool>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/vec-on-unimplemented.rs:3:23
|
LL | vec![true, false].map(|v| !v).collect::<Vec<_>>();
| ^^^ `Vec<bool>` is not an iterator
|
help: call `.into_iter()` first
|
LL | vec![true, false].into_iter().map(|v| !v).collect::<Vec<_>>();
| ++++++++++++
```
We used to provide some help through `rustc_on_unimplemented` on non-`impl Trait` and non-type-params, but this lets us get rid of some otherwise unnecessary conditions in the annotation on `Iterator`.
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that
tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root
obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for
the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the
most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't
implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type
from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid
talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about
`T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in
`tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs
to change).
This is the second time I'm doing this... I'm starting to feel like
stage1 ui-fulldeps tests were a mistake. Maybe I should have just put
`#[cfg(bootstrap)]` there to let the bootstrap bumper fix it.
Add new `pattern_complexity` attribute to add possibility to limit and check recursion in pattern matching
Needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/9528.
This PR adds a new attribute only available when running rust testsuite called `pattern_complexity` which allows to set the maximum recursion for the pattern matching. It is quite useful to ensure the complexity doesn't grow, like in `tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/issue-118437-exponential-time-on-diagonal-match.rs`.
r? `@Nadrieril`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120761 (Add initial support for DataFlowSanitizer)
- #121622 (Preserve same vtable pointer when cloning raw waker, to fix Waker::will_wake)
- #121716 (match lowering: Lower bindings in a predictable order)
- #121731 (Now that inlining, mir validation and const eval all use reveal-all, we won't be constraining hidden types here anymore)
- #121841 (`f16` and `f128` step 2: intrinsics)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Leverage `anstyle-svg`, as `cargo` does now, to emit `.svg` files
instead of `.stderr` files for tests that explicitly enable color
output. This will make reviewing changes to the graphical output of
tests much more human friendly.
Now that inlining, mir validation and const eval all use reveal-all, we won't be constraining hidden types here anymore
r? `@compiler-errors`
one bubble down, two more to go
the test is unrelated, just something I noticed would be good to test in both the old solver and the new.
match lowering: Lower bindings in a predictable order
After the recent refactorings, we can now lower bindings in a truly predictable order. The order in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120214 was an improvement but not very clear. With this PR, we lower bindings from left to right, with the special case that `x @ pat` is traversed as `pat @ x` (i.e. `x` is lowered after any bindings in `pat`).
This description only applies in the absence of or-patterns. Or-patterns make everything complicated, because the binding place depends on the subpattern. Until I have a better idea I leave them to be handled in whatever weird order arises from today's code.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Add initial support for DataFlowSanitizer
Adds initial support for DataFlowSanitizer to the Rust compiler. It currently supports `-Zsanitizer-dataflow-abilist`. Additional options for it can be passed to LLVM command line argument processor via LLVM arguments using `llvm-args` codegen option (e.g., `-Cllvm-args=-dfsan-combine-pointer-labels-on-load=false`).
This commit adds a new target called `wasm32-wasip1` to rustc.
This new target is explained in these two MCPs:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/607
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/695
In short, the previous `wasm32-wasi` target is going to be renamed to
`wasm32-wasip1` to better live alongside the [new
`wasm32-wasip2` target](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119616).
This new target is added alongside the `wasm32-wasi` target and has the
exact same definition as the previous target. This PR is effectively a
rename of `wasm32-wasi` to `wasm32-wasip1`. Note, however, that
as explained in rust-lang/compiler-team#695 the previous `wasm32-wasi`
target is not being removed at this time. This change will reach stable
Rust before even a warning about the rename will be printed. At this
time this change is just the start where a new target is introduced and
users can start migrating if they support only Nightly for example.
Account for unmet T: !Copy in E0277 message
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/simple.rs:10:16
|
LL | not_copy::<T>();
| ^ the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied
```
instead of the current
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `T: !Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/simple.rs:10:16
|
LL | not_copy::<T>();
| ^ the trait `!Copy` is not implemented for `T`
```
Display short types for unimplemented trait
Shortens unimplemented trait diagnostics. Now shows:
```
error[E0277]: `Option<Option<Option<...>>>` doesn't implement `std::fmt::Display`
--> $DIR/on_unimplemented_long_types.rs:4:17
|
LL | pub fn foo() -> impl std::fmt::Display {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `Option<Option<Option<...>>>` cannot be formatted with the default formatter
LL |
LL | / Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(S...
LL | | Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(So...
LL | | Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Som...
LL | | Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some(Some...
... |
LL | | ))))))))))),
LL | | )))))))))))
| |_______________- return type was inferred to be `Option<Option<Option<...>>>` here
|
= help: the trait `std::fmt::Display` is not implemented for `Option<Option<Option<...>>>`
= note: in format strings you may be able to use `{:?}` (or {:#?} for pretty-print) instead
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
```
I'm not 100% sure if this is desirable, or if we should just let the long types remain long. This is also kinda a short-term bandaid solution. The real long term solution is to properly migrate `rustc_trait_selection`'s error reporting to use translatable diagnostics and then properly handle type name printing.
Fixes#121687.
Don't grab variances in `TypeRelating` relation if we're invariant
Since `Invariant.xform(var) = Invariant` always, so just copy what the generalizer relation does.
Fixes#110106
Detect more cases of `=` to `:` typo
When a `Local` is fully parsed, but not followed by a `;`, keep the `:` span arround and mention it. If the type could continue being parsed as an expression, suggest replacing the `:` with a `=`.
```
error: expected one of `!`, `+`, `->`, `::`, `;`, or `=`, found `.`
--> file.rs:2:32
|
2 | let _: std::env::temp_dir().join("foo");
| - ^ expected one of `!`, `+`, `->`, `::`, `;`, or `=`
| |
| while parsing the type for `_`
| help: use `=` if you meant to assign
```
Fix#119665.
Adds initial support for DataFlowSanitizer to the Rust compiler. It
currently supports `-Zsanitizer-dataflow-abilist`. Additional options
for it can be passed to LLVM command line argument processor via LLVM
arguments using `llvm-args` codegen option (e.g.,
`-Cllvm-args=-dfsan-combine-pointer-labels-on-load=false`).
Implement missing ABI structures in StableMIR
Add implementations for Scalar, Primitive and WrappingRange for StableMIR.
FYI, I thought about reusing the `rustc_abi` module, since it is designed to not necessarily depend on the `rustc` internals, but the maintenance burden to maintain this crate in crates.io doesn't seem worth it at this point.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/58
Move sanitizer ui tests to sanitizer directory
Moves the sanitizer ui tests to the sanitizer directory and removes the sanitizer prefix from tests file names similarly to how the sanitizer codegen tests are organized.
Never say "`Trait` is implemented for `{type error}`"
When a trait bound error occurs, we look for alternative types that would have made the bound succeed. For some reason `{type error}` sometimes would appear as a type that would do so.
We now remove `{type error}` from the list in every case to avoid nonsensical `note`s.
match lowering: Separate the `bool` case from other integers in `TestKind`
`TestKind::SwitchInt` had a special case for `bool` essentially everywhere it's used, so I made `TestKind::If` to handle the bool case on its own.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Suggest removing superfluous semicolon when statements used as expression
Fixes#105431
- it's not a pure recursive visitor, so I guess there may be some more complex scenarios not covered.
- moved `consider_removing_semicolon` to `compiler/rustc_infer` for reusing this helper function.
Handle stashing of delayed bugs
By just emitting them immediately, because it does happen in practice, when errors are downgraded to delayed bugs.
We already had one case in `lint.rs` where we handled this at the callsite. This commit changes things so it's handled within `stash_diagnostic` instead, because #121812 identified a second case, and it's possible there are more.
Fixes#121812.
r? ````@oli-obk````
Make the success arms of `if lhs || rhs` meet up in a separate block
Extracted from #118305, where this is necessary to avoid introducing a bug when injecting marker statements into the then/else arms.
---
In the previous code (#111752), the success block of `lhs` would jump directly to the success block of `rhs`. However, `rhs_success_block` could already contain statements that are specific to the RHS, and the direct goto causes them to be executed in the LHS success path as well.
This patch therefore creates a fresh block that the LHS and RHS success blocks can both jump to.
---
I think the reason we currently get away with this is that `rhs_success_block` usually doesn't contain anything other than StorageDead statements for locals used by the RHS, and those statements don't seem to cause problems in the LHS success path (which never makes those locals live).
But if we start adding meaningful statements for branch coverage (or MC/DC coverage), it's important to keep the LHS and RHS blocks separate.
make unused_imports less assertive in test modules
closes#121502
This is a fairly small change and I used the fix suggested in the example expected error message.
Not sure if I should've rather used the alternatives but this one seems the most descriptive.
Some alternatives:
- if this is meant to be a test module, add `#[cfg(test)]` to the containing module
- try adding #[cfg(test)] to this test module
- consider adding #[allow(unused_imports)] if you want to silent the lint on the unused import
- consider removing the unused import
