Exhaustiveness: remove the need for arena-allocation within the algorithm
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119688, exhaustiveness checking doesn't need access to the arena anymore. This simplifies the lifetime story and makes it compile on stable without the extra dependency.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Inverting the condition lets us merge the two `Ok(false)` paths. I also
find the inverted condition easier to read: "all the things that must be
true for trimming to occur", instead of "any of the things that must be
true for trimming to not occur".
Don't ICE when noting GAT bounds in `report_no_match_method_error`
We can encounter `BindingObligation`s from GATs that we should handle in `report_no_match_method_error`. I assume we can encounter them from methods, though I didn't really feel like wasting my time creating a repro.
Fixes#119942
Make `InferCtxtExt::could_impl_trait` more precise, less ICEy
The implementation for `InferCtxtExt::could_impl_trait` was very wrong. Along with being pretty poorly named, way too specific to ADTs, it was also doing impl substitution wrong -- this caused an ICE (#119915).
This PR generalizes that code, gives it a clearer name, makes it stop using the new trait solver (lol), and fixes some fallout bad suggestions that are made worse with the code fix.
Fixes#119915
`Diagnostic::code` has the type `DiagnosticId`, which has `Error` and
`Lint` variants. Plus `Diagnostic::is_lint` is a bool, which should be
redundant w.r.t. `Diagnostic::code`.
Seems simple. Except it's possible for a lint to have an error code, in
which case its `code` field is recorded as `Error`, and `is_lint` is
required to indicate that it's a lint. This is what happens with
`derive(LintDiagnostic)` lints. Which means those lints don't have a
lint name or a `has_future_breakage` field because those are stored in
the `DiagnosticId::Lint`.
It's all a bit messy and confused and seems unintentional.
This commit:
- removes `DiagnosticId`;
- changes `Diagnostic::code` to `Option<String>`, which means both
errors and lints can straightforwardly have an error code;
- changes `Diagnostic::is_lint` to `Option<IsLint>`, where `IsLint` is a
new type containing a lint name and a `has_future_breakage` bool, so
all lints can have those, error code or not.
This also switches from `split_off(0)` to `std::mem::take` when emptying the
accumulated list of blocks, because `split_off(0)` handles capacity in a way
that is unintuitive when used in a loop.
The old loop had two separate places where it would flush the acumulated list
of straight-line blocks into a new BCB. One occurred at the start of the loop
body when the current block couldn't be chained into, and the other occurred at
the end of the loop body when the current block couldn't be chained from.
The latter check can be hoisted to the start of the loop body by making it
examine the previous block (which has added itself to the list) instead of the
current block. With that done, we can combine the two separate flushes into one
flush with two possible trigger conditions.
Filtering out unreachable successors is only needed by the main graph traversal
loop, so we can move the filtering step into that loop instead, eliminating the
need to pass the MIR body into `bcb_filtered_successors`.
store the segment name when resolution fails
Fixes#112672
The `find_cfg_stripped` does indeed get executed within `smart_resolve_report_errors`. However, this error is not reported as it is subsequently overridden by `parent_err`. (See: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/late.rs#L3760)
This PR changes `last_segment` to `segment`, which stores the name of the failed resolution, and ensures that the result of `find_cfg_stripped` is also included in `parent_err`.
r? ```@Nilstrieb```
Suggest Upgrading Compiler for Gated Features
This PR addresses #117318
I have a few questions:
1. Do we want to specify the current version and release date of the compiler? I have added this in via environment variables, which I found in the code for the rustc cli where it handles the `--version` flag
a. How can I handle the changing message in the tests?
3. Do we want to only show this message when the compiler is old?
a. How can we determine when the compiler is old?
I'll wait until we figure out the message to bless the tests
Move platform modules into `sys::pal`
This is the initial step of #117276. `sys` just re-exports everything from the current `sys` for now, I'll move the implementations for the individual features one-by-one after this PR merges.
Taint `_` placeholder types in trait impl method signatures
We report an error right below for them, but that kind of broken type can cause subsequent ICEs.
fixes#119867
Allow `~const` on associated type bounds again
This follows from [this Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/419616-t-compiler.2Fproject-const-traits/topic/projections.20on.20.28~.29const.20Trait.20.26.20.28~.29const.20assoc.20ty.20bounds).
Basically in my opinion, it makes sense to allow `~const` on associated type bounds again since they're quite useful even though we haven't implemented the proposed syntax `<Ty as ~const Trait>::Proj`/`<Ty as const Trait>::Proj` yet; that can happen as a follow-up.
This already allows more code to compile since `T::Assoc` where `T` is a type parameter and where the predicate `<T as ~const Trait>` is in the environment gets elaborated to (pseudo) `<T as ~const Trait>::Assoc`.
```rs
#[const_trait]
trait Trait {
type Assoc: ~const Trait;
fn func() -> i32;
}
const fn function<T: ~const Trait>() -> i32 {
T::Assoc::func()
}
```
`~const` associated type bounds also work together with `const` bounds:
```rs
struct Type<const N: i32>;
fn procedure<T: const Trait>() -> Type<{ T::Assoc::func() }> { // `Trait` comes from above
Type
}
```
NB: This PR also starts allowing `~const` bounds in the generics and the where-clause of trait associated types since it's trivial to support them. However, I don't know if those bounds are actually useful. Maybe we should continue to reject them?
For reference, it wouldn't make any sense to allow `~const Trait` in GACs (generic associated constants, `generic_const_items`) because they'd be absolutely useless (contrary to `const Trait`).
~~[``@]rustbot`` ping project-const-traits~~
r? project-const-traits
Varargs support for system ABI
This PR allows functions with the `system` ABI to be variadic (under the `extended_varargs_abi_support` feature tracked in #100189). On x86 windows, the `system` ABI is equivalent to `C` for variadic functions. On other platforms, `system` is already equivalent to `C`.
Fixes#110505
Overhaul `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`
It's current behaviour is surprising, in a bad way. This also makes the implementation more complex than it needs to be.
r? `@oli-obk`
Add explicit `none()` value variant in check-cfg
This PR adds an explicit none value variant in check-cfg values: `values(none())`.
Currently the only way to define the none variant is with an empty `values()` which means that if someone has a cfg that takes none and strings they need to use two invocations: `--check-cfg=cfg(foo) --check-cfg=cfg(foo, values("bar"))`.
Which would now be `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none(),"bar"))`, this is simpler and easier to understand.
`--check-cfg=cfg(foo)`, `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values())` and `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none()))` would be equivalent.
*Another motivation for doing this is to make empty `values()` actually means no-values, but this is orthogonal to this PR and adding `none()` is sufficient in it-self.*
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@petrochenkov`
