Don't call `extern_crate` when local crate name is the same as a dependency and we have a trait error
#124944 implemented logic to point out when a trait bound failure involves a *trait* and *type* who come from identically named but different crates. This logic calls the `extern_crate` query which is not valid on `LOCAL_CRATE` cnum, so let's filter that out eagerly.
Fixes#130272Fixes#129184
Encode `coroutine_by_move_body_def_id` in crate metadata
We synthesize the MIR for a by-move body for the `FnOnce` implementation of async closures. It can be accessed with the `coroutine_by_move_body_def_id` query. We weren't encoding this query in the metadata though, nor were we properly recording that synthetic MIR in `mir_keys`, so the `optimized_mir` wasn't getting encoded either!
Stacked on top is a fix to consider `DefKind::SyntheticCoroutineBody` to return true in several places I missed. Specifically, we should consider the def-kind in `fn DefKind::is_fn_like()`, since that's what we were using to make sure we ensure `query mir_inliner_callees` before the MIR gets stolen for the body. This led to some CI failures that were caught by miri but which I added a test for.
Fix#128930: Print documentation of CLI options missing their arg
Fix#128930. Failing to give an argument to CLI options which require it now prints something like:
```
$ rustc --print
error: Argument to option 'print' missing
Usage:
--print [crate-name|file-names|sysroot|target-libdir|cfg|check-cfg|calling-conventions|target-list|target-cpus|target-features|relocation-models|code-models|tls-models|target-spec-json|all-target-specs-json|native-static-libs|stack-protector-strategies|link-args|deployment-target]
Compiler information to print on stdout
```
Relate receiver invariantly in method probe for `Mode::Path`
Effectively reverts part of #126128Fixes#126227
This PR changes method probing to use equality for fully path-based method lookup, and subtyping for receiver `.` method lookup.
r? lcnr
layout computation: gracefully handle unsized types in unexpected locations
This PR reworks the layout computation to eagerly return an error when encountering an unsized field where a sized field was expected, rather than delaying a bug and attempting to recover a layout. This is required, because with trivially false where clauses like `[T]: Sized`, any field can possible be an unsized type, without causing a compile error.
Since this PR removes the `delayed_bug` method from the `LayoutCalculator` trait, it essentially becomes the same as the `HasDataLayout` trait, so I've also refactored the `LayoutCalculator` to be a simple wrapper struct around a type that implements `HasDataLayout`.
The majority of the diff is whitespace changes, so viewing with whitespace ignored is advised.
implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123169#issuecomment-2025788480
r? `@compiler-errors` or compiler
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123134
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124182
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126939
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127737
For structs that cannot be unsized, the layout algorithm sometimes moves
unsized fields to the end of the struct, which circumvented the error
for unexpected unsized fields and returned an unsized layout anyway.
This commit makes it so that the unexpected unsized error is always
returned for structs that cannot be unsized, allowing us to remove an
old hack and fixing some old ICE.
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130033 (Don't call `fn_arg_names` query for non-`fn` foreign items in resolver)
- #130282 (Do not report an excessive number of overflow errors for an ever-growing deref impl)
- #130437 (Avoid crashing on variadic functions when producing arg-mismatch errors)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Avoid crashing on variadic functions when producing arg-mismatch errors
Fixes#130372 by accommodating how variadic functions change the argument list length between HIR body and FnDecls.
Also degrades the zip_eq to a debug_assert! to match other asserts in the area to avoid being disruptive to users. There is at least one other crash in this area I am working on in #130400 and also considering how we might refactor some of this code to hoist some of this logic up higher.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Do not report an excessive number of overflow errors for an ever-growing deref impl
Check that we don't first hit the recursion limit in `get_field_candidates_considering_privacy` before probing for methods when we have a method lookup failure and we want to see if `.field.method()` exists. We also silence overflow error messages if we're probing for methods for diagnostics.
Also renames some functions to make it clearer that they're only for diagnostics, and sprinkle some `Autoderef::silence_errors` around to silence unnecessary overflow errors that come from diagnostics.
Fixes#130224.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123436 (linker: Allow MSVC to use import libraries following the Meson/MinGW convention)
- #130410 (Don't ICE when generating `Fn` shim for async closure with borrowck error)
- #130412 (Don't ICE when RPITIT captures more method args than trait definition)
- #130436 (Ignore reduce-fadd-unordered on SGX platform)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't ICE when RPITIT captures more method args than trait definition
Make sure we don't ICE when an RPITIT captures more method args than the trait definition, which is not allowed. This was because we were using the wrong def id for error reporting.
Due to the default lifetime capture rules of RPITITs (capturing everything in scope), this is only doable if we use precise capturing, which isn't currently allowed for RPITITs anyways but we still end up reaching the relevant codepaths.
Fixes#129850
Don't use `typeck_root_def_id` in codegen for finding closure's root
Generating debuginfo in codegen currently peels off all the closure-specific generics (which presumably is done because they're redundant). This doesn't currently work correctly for the bodies we synthesize for async closures's returned coroutines (#128506), leading to #129702.
Specifically, `typeck_root_def_id` for some `DefKind::SyntheticCoroutineBody` just returns itself (because it loops while `is_typeck_child` is `true`, and that returns `false` for this defkind), which means we don't end up peeling off the coroutine-specific generics, and we end up encountering an otherwise unreachable `CoroutineWitness` type leading to an ICE.
This PR fixes `is_typeck_child` to consider `DefKind::SyntheticCorotuineBody` to be a typeck child, fixing `typeck_root_def_id` and suppressing this debuginfo bug.
Fixes#129702
simplify float::classify logic
I played around with the float-classify test in the hope of triggering x87 bugs by strategically adding `black_box`, and still the exact expression `@beetrees` suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129835#issuecomment-2325661597) remains the only case I found where we get the wrong result on x87. Curiously, this bug only occurs when MIR optimizations are enabled -- probably the extra inlining that does is required for LLVM to hit the right "bad" case in the backend. But even for that case, it makes no difference whether `classify` is implemented in the simple bit-pattern-based version or the more complicated version we had before.
Without even a single testcase that can distinguish our `classify` from the naive version, I suggest we switch to the naive version.
interpret, miri: fix dealing with overflow during slice indexing and allocation
This is mostly to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130284.
I then realized we're using somewhat sketchy arguments for a similar multiplication in `copy`/`copy_nonoverlapping`/`write_bytes`, so I made them all share the same function that checks exactly the right thing. (The intrinsics would previously fail on allocations larger than `1 << 47` bytes... which are theoretically possible maybe? Anyway it seems conceptually wrong to use any other bound than `isize::MAX` here.)
Correctly account for niche-optimized tags in rustc_transmute
This is a bit hacky, but it fixes the ICE and makes it possible to run the safe transmute check on every `mem::transmute` check we instantiate. I want to write a lint that needs to do that, but this stands well on its own.
cc `@jswrenn` here's the fix I alluded to yesterday :)
Fixes#123693
Stabilize `&mut` (and `*mut`) as well as `&Cell` (and `*const Cell`) in const
This stabilizes `const_mut_refs` and `const_refs_to_cell`. That allows a bunch of new things in const contexts:
- Mentioning `&mut` types
- Creating `&mut` and `*mut` values
- Creating `&T` and `*const T` values where `T` contains interior mutability
- Dereferencing `&mut` and `*mut` values (both for reads and writes)
The same rules as at runtime apply: mutating immutable data is UB. This includes mutation through pointers derived from shared references; the following is diagnosed with a hard error:
```rust
#[allow(invalid_reference_casting)]
const _: () = {
let mut val = 15;
let ptr = &val as *const i32 as *mut i32;
unsafe { *ptr = 16; }
};
```
The main limitation that is enforced is that the final value of a const (or non-`mut` static) may not contain `&mut` values nor interior mutable `&` values. This is necessary because the memory those references point to becomes *read-only* when the constant is done computing, so (interior) mutable references to such memory would be pretty dangerous. We take a multi-layered approach here to ensuring no mutable references escape the initializer expression:
- A static analysis rejects (interior) mutable references when the referee looks like it may outlive the current MIR body.
- To be extra sure, this static check is complemented by a "safety net" of dynamic checks. ("Dynamic" in the sense of "running during/after const-evaluation, e.g. at runtime of this code" -- in contrast to "static" which works entirely by looking at the MIR without evaluating it.)
- After the final value is computed, we do a type-driven traversal of the entire value, and if we find any `&mut` or interior-mutable `&` we error out.
- However, the type-driven traversal cannot traverse `union` or raw pointers, so there is a second dynamic check where if the final value of the const contains any pointer that was not derived from a shared reference, we complain. This is currently a future-compat lint, but will become an ICE in #128543. On the off-chance that it's actually possible to trigger this lint on stable, I'd prefer if we could make it an ICE before stabilizing const_mut_refs, but it's not a hard blocker. This part of the "safety net" is only active for mutable references since with shared references, it has false positives.
Altogether this should prevent people from leaking (interior) mutable references out of the const initializer.
While updating the tests I learned that surprisingly, this code gets rejected:
```rust
const _: Vec<i32> = {
let mut x = Vec::<i32>::new(); //~ ERROR destructor of `Vec<i32>` cannot be evaluated at compile-time
let r = &mut x;
let y = x;
y
};
```
The analysis that rejects destructors in `const` is very conservative when it sees an `&mut` being created to `x`, and then considers `x` to be always live. See [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65394#issuecomment-541499219) for a longer explanation. `const_precise_live_drops` will solve this, so I consider this problem to be tracked by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73255.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` `@rust-lang/lang`
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80384
Add `NonNull` convenience methods to `Box` and `Vec`
Implements the ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/418.
The docs for the added methods are mostly copied from the existing methods that use raw pointers instead of `NonNull`.
I'm new to this "contributing to rustc" thing, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong. In particular, I don't know what the process is for creating a new unstable feature. Please advise me if I should do something. Thank you.
stabilize `const_extern_fn`
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64926
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64926
reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1596
## Stabilizaton Report
### Summary
Using `const extern "Rust"` and `const extern "C"` was already stabilized (since version 1.62.0, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95346). This PR stabilizes the other calling conventions: it is now possible to write `const unsafe extern "calling-convention" fn` and `const extern "calling-convention" fn` for any supported calling convention:
```rust
const extern "C-unwind" fn foo1(val: u8) -> u8 { val + 1}
const extern "stdcall" fn foo2(val: u8) -> u8 { val + 1}
const unsafe extern "C-unwind" fn bar1(val: bool) -> bool { !val }
const unsafe extern "stdcall" fn bar2(val: bool) -> bool { !val }
```
This can be used to const-ify an `extern fn`, or conversely, to make a `const fn` callable from external code.
r? T-lang
cc `@RalfJung`
const-eval interning: accept interior mutable pointers in final value
…but keep rejecting mutable references
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121610 by no longer firing the lint when there is a pointer with interior mutability in the final value of the constant. On stable, such pointers can be created with code like:
```rust
pub enum JsValue {
Undefined,
Object(Cell<bool>),
}
impl Drop for JsValue {
fn drop(&mut self) {}
}
// This does *not* get promoted since `JsValue` has a destructor.
// However, the outer scope rule applies, still giving this 'static lifetime.
const UNDEFINED: &JsValue = &JsValue::Undefined;
```
It's not great to accept such values since people *might* think that it is legal to mutate them with unsafe code. (This is related to how "infectious" `UnsafeCell` is, which is a [wide open question](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/236).) However, we [explicitly document](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html) that things created by `const` are immutable. Furthermore, we also accept the following even more questionable code without any lint today:
```rust
let x: &'static Option<Cell<i32>> = &None;
```
This is even more questionable since it does *not* involve a `const`, and yet still puts the data into immutable memory. We could view this as promotion [potentially introducing UB](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/493). However, we've accepted this since ~forever and it's [too late to reject this now](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122789); the pattern is just too useful.
So basically, if you think that `UnsafeCell` should be tracked fully precisely, then you should want the lint we currently emit to be removed, which this PR does. If you think `UnsafeCell` should "infect" surrounding `enum`s, the big problem is really https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/493 which does not trigger the lint -- the cases the lint triggers on are actually the "harmless" ones as there is an explicit surrounding `const` explaining why things end up being immutable.
What all this goes to show is that the hard error added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118324 (later turned into the future-compat lint that I am now suggesting we remove) was based on some wrong assumptions, at least insofar as it concerns shared references. Furthermore, that lint does not help at all for the most problematic case here where the potential UB is completely implicit. (In fact, the lint is actively in the way of [my preferred long-term strategy](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/493#issuecomment-2028674105) for dealing with this UB.) So I think we should go back to square one and remove that error/lint for shared references. For mutable references, it does seem to work as intended, so we can keep it. Here it serves as a safety net in case the static checks that try to contain mutable references to the inside of a const initializer are not working as intended; I therefore made the check ICE to encourage users to tell us if that safety net is triggered.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122153 by removing the lint.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@rust-lang/lang`
Fix `Parser::break_up_float`'s right span
```rs
use std::mem::offset_of;
fn main() {
offset_of!((u8,), 0.0);
}
```
Before:
```
error[E0609]: no field `0` on type `u8`
--> ./main.rs:4:25
|
4 | offset_of!((u8,), 0.0);
| _____--------------------^-
| | |
| | in this macro invocation
5 | | }
... |
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `offset_of` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
```
After:
```
error[E0609]: no field `0` on type `u8`
--> ./main.rs:4:25
|
4 | offset_of!((u8,), 0.0);
| ^
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
```
---
`@rustbot` label +A-parser +D-imprecise-spans
simd_shuffle: require index argument to be a vector
Remove some codegen hacks by forcing the SIMD shuffle `index` argument to be a vector, which means (thanks to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128537) that it will automatically be passed as an immediate in LLVM. The only special-casing we still have is for the extra sanity-checks we add that ensure that the indices are all in-bounds. (And the GCC backend needs to do a bunch of work since the Rust intrinsic is modeled after what LLVM expects, which seems to be quite different from what GCC expects.)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128738, see that issue for more context.
(fix) conflicting negative impl marker
## Context
This MR fixes the error message for conflicting negative trait impls by adding the corresponding the polarity marker to the trait name.
## Issues
- closes#70849
r? `@fmease`
Don't call closure_by_move_body_def_id on FnOnce async closures in MIR validation
Refactors the check in #129847 to not unncessarily call the `closure_by_move_body_def_id` query for async closures that don't *need* a by-move body.
Fixes#130167
