An earlier commit included the change for a suggestion here.
Unfortunately, it also used unwrap instead of dying properly.
Roll out the ~~rice paper~~ EarlyDiagCtxt before we do anything that
might leave a mess.
Trim crate graph
This PR removes some unnecessary `Cargo.toml` entries, and makes some other small related cleanups that I found while looking at this stuff.
r? ```@pnkfelix```
Change `SIGPIPE` ui from `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` to `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`
In the stabilization [attempt](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832) of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern was [raised ](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832#issuecomment-2007394609) related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes awkward.
So as a first step towards the next stabilization attempt, this PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was [also raised](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832#issuecomment-1987023484), namely that the ui should not leak **how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be iterated on further before stabilization.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
There are a few common abbreviations like `use rustc_ast as ast` and
`use rust_hir as hir` for names that are used a lot. But there are also
some cases where a crate is renamed just once in the whole codebase, and
that ends up making things harder to read rather than easier. This
commit removes them.
In the stabilization attempt of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern
was raised related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long
term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just
libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes
awkward.
So as a first step towards towards the next stabilization attempt, this
PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag
`-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language
is not "contaminated" by this feature.
Another point was also raised, namely that the ui should not leak
**how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new
flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be
iterated on further before stabilization.
Fix `ErrorGuaranteed` unsoundness with stash/steal.
When you stash an error, the error count is incremented. You can then use the non-zero error count to get an `ErrorGuaranteed`. You can then steal the error, which decrements the error count. You can then cancel the error.
Example code:
```
fn unsound(dcx: &DiagCtxt) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
let sp = rustc_span::DUMMY_SP;
let k = rustc_errors::StashKey::Cycle;
dcx.struct_err("bogus").stash(sp, k); // increment error count on stash
let guar = dcx.has_errors().unwrap(); // ErrorGuaranteed from error count > 0
let err = dcx.steal_diagnostic(sp, k).unwrap(); // decrement error count on steal
err.cancel(); // cancel error
guar // ErrorGuaranteed with no error emitted!
}
```
This commit fixes the problem in the simplest way: by not counting stashed errors in `DiagCtxt::{err_count,has_errors}`.
However, just doing this without any other changes leads to over 40 ui test failures. Mostly because of uninteresting extra errors (many saying "type annotations needed" when type inference fails), and in a few cases, due to delayed bugs causing ICEs when no normal errors are printed.
To fix these, this commit adds `DiagCtxt::stashed_err_count`, and uses it in three places alongside `DiagCtxt::{has_errors,err_count}`. It's dodgy to rely on it, because unlike `DiagCtxt::err_count` it can go up and down. But it's needed to preserve existing behaviour, and at least the three places that need it are now obvious.
r? oli-obk
Invert diagnostic lints.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than half of the compiler has been converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow` attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
r? ````@davidtwco````
When you stash an error, the error count is incremented. You can then
use the non-zero error count to get an `ErrorGuaranteed`. You can then
steal the error, which decrements the error count. You can then cancel
the error.
Example code:
```
fn unsound(dcx: &DiagCtxt) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
let sp = rustc_span::DUMMY_SP;
let k = rustc_errors::StashKey::Cycle;
dcx.struct_err("bogus").stash(sp, k); // increment error count on stash
let guar = dcx.has_errors().unwrap(); // ErrorGuaranteed from error count > 0
let err = dcx.steal_diagnostic(sp, k).unwrap(); // decrement error count on steal
err.cancel(); // cancel error
guar // ErrorGuaranteed with no error emitted!
}
```
This commit fixes the problem in the simplest way: by not counting
stashed errors in `DiagCtxt::{err_count,has_errors}`.
However, just doing this without any other changes leads to over 40 ui
test failures. Mostly because of uninteresting extra errors (many saying
"type annotations needed" when type inference fails), and in a few
cases, due to delayed bugs causing ICEs when no normal errors are
printed.
To fix these, this commit adds `DiagCtxt::stashed_err_count`, and uses
it in three places alongside `DiagCtxt::{has_errors,err_count}`. It's
dodgy to rely on it, because unlike `DiagCtxt::err_count` it can go up
and down. But it's needed to preserve existing behaviour, and at least
the three places that need it are now obvious.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and
`untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than
half of the compiler has be converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow`
attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
Track `verbose` and `verbose_internals`
`verbose_internals` has been UNTRACKED since it was introduced. When i added `verbose` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119129 i made it UNTRACKED as well.
``@bjorn3`` says: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119286#discussion_r1436134354
> On errors we don't finalize the incr comp cache, but non-fatal diagnostics are cached afaik.
Otherwise we would have to replay the query in question, which we may not be able to do if the query key is not reconstructible from the dep node fingerprint.
So we must track these flags to avoid replaying incorrect diagnostics.
r? incremental
bjorn3 says:
> On errors we don't finalize the incr comp cache, but non-fatal diagnostics are cached afaik.
Otherwise we would have to replay the query in question, which we may not be able to do if the query
key is not reconstructible from the dep node fingerprint.
So we must track these flags to avoid replaying incorrect diagnostics.
Improved collapse_debuginfo attribute, added command-line flag
Improved attribute collapse_debuginfo with variants: `#[collapse_debuginfo=(no|external|yes)]`.
Added command-line flag for default behaviour.
Work-in-progress: will add more tests.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100758
Add explicit `none()` value variant in check-cfg
This PR adds an explicit none value variant in check-cfg values: `values(none())`.
Currently the only way to define the none variant is with an empty `values()` which means that if someone has a cfg that takes none and strings they need to use two invocations: `--check-cfg=cfg(foo) --check-cfg=cfg(foo, values("bar"))`.
Which would now be `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none(),"bar"))`, this is simpler and easier to understand.
`--check-cfg=cfg(foo)`, `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values())` and `--check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none()))` would be equivalent.
*Another motivation for doing this is to make empty `values()` actually means no-values, but this is orthogonal to this PR and adding `none()` is sufficient in it-self.*
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@petrochenkov`
One consequence is that errors returned by
`maybe_new_parser_from_source_str` now must be consumed, so a bunch of
places that previously ignored those errors now cancel them. (Most of
them explicitly dropped the errors before. I guess that was to indicate
"we are explicitly ignoring these", though I'm not 100% sure.)
It was added in #54232. It seems like it was aimed at NLL development,
which is well in the past. Also, it looks like `-Ztreat-err-as-bug` can
be used to achieve the same effect. So it doesn't seem necessary.
They are no longer used, because
`{DiagCtxt,DiagCtxtInner}::emit_diagnostic` are used everywhere instead.
This also means `track_diagnostic` can become consuming.
This works for most of its call sites. This is nice, because `emit` very
much makes sense as a consuming operation -- indeed,
`DiagnosticBuilderState` exists to ensure no diagnostic is emitted
twice, but it uses runtime checks.
For the small number of call sites where a consuming emit doesn't work,
the commit adds `DiagnosticBuilder::emit_without_consuming`. (This will
be removed in subsequent commits.)
Likewise, `emit_unless` becomes consuming. And `delay_as_bug` becomes
consuming, while `delay_as_bug_without_consuming` is added (which will
also be removed in subsequent commits.)
All this requires significant changes to `DiagnosticBuilder`'s chaining
methods. Currently `DiagnosticBuilder` method chaining uses a
non-consuming `&mut self -> &mut Self` style, which allows chaining to
be used when the chain ends in `emit()`, like so:
```
struct_err(msg).span(span).emit();
```
But it doesn't work when producing a `DiagnosticBuilder` value,
requiring this:
```
let mut err = self.struct_err(msg);
err.span(span);
err
```
This style of chaining won't work with consuming `emit` though. For
that, we need to use to a `self -> Self` style. That also would allow
`DiagnosticBuilder` production to be chained, e.g.:
```
self.struct_err(msg).span(span)
```
However, removing the `&mut self -> &mut Self` style would require that
individual modifications of a `DiagnosticBuilder` go from this:
```
err.span(span);
```
to this:
```
err = err.span(span);
```
There are *many* such places. I have a high tolerance for tedious
refactorings, but even I gave up after a long time trying to convert
them all.
Instead, this commit has it both ways: the existing `&mut self -> Self`
chaining methods are kept, and new `self -> Self` chaining methods are
added, all of which have a `_mv` suffix (short for "move"). Changes to
the existing `forward!` macro lets this happen with very little
additional boilerplate code. I chose to add the suffix to the new
chaining methods rather than the existing ones, because the number of
changes required is much smaller that way.
This doubled chainging is a bit clumsy, but I think it is worthwhile
because it allows a *lot* of good things to subsequently happen. In this
commit, there are many `mut` qualifiers removed in places where
diagnostics are emitted without being modified. In subsequent commits:
- chaining can be used more, making the code more concise;
- more use of chaining also permits the removal of redundant diagnostic
APIs like `struct_err_with_code`, which can be replaced easily with
`struct_err` + `code_mv`;
- `emit_without_diagnostic` can be removed, which simplifies a lot of
machinery, removing the need for `DiagnosticBuilderState`.
Remove `-Zreport-delayed-bugs`.
It's not used within the repository in any way (e.g. in tests), and doesn't seem useful.
It was added in #52568.
r? ````@oli-obk````
Remove `-Zdump-mir-spanview`
The `-Zdump-mir-spanview` flag was added back in #76074, as a development/debugging aid for the initial work on what would eventually become `-Cinstrument-coverage`. It causes the compiler to emit an HTML file containing a function's source code, with various spans highlighted based on the contents of MIR.
When the suggestion was made to [triage and remove unnecessary `-Z` flags (Zulip)](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.60-Z.60.20option.20triage), I noted that this flag could potentially be worth removing, but I wanted to keep it around to see whether I found it useful for my own coverage work.
But when I actually tried to use it, I ran into various issues (e.g. it crashes on `tests/coverage/closure.rs`). If I can't trust it to work properly without a full overhaul, then instead of diving down a rabbit hole of trying to fix arcane span-handling bugs, it seems better to just remove this obscure old code entirely.
---
````@rustbot```` label +A-code-coverage
