os-rust/tests/ui/stability-attribute/missing-const-stability.stderr
Ralf Jung a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00

38 lines
1.2 KiB
Text

warning: the feature `effects` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/missing-const-stability.rs:3:30
|
LL | #![feature(const_trait_impl, effects, rustc_attrs, intrinsics)]
| ^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #102090 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102090> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: function has missing const stability attribute
--> $DIR/missing-const-stability.rs:7:1
|
LL | pub const fn foo() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: implementation has missing const stability attribute
--> $DIR/missing-const-stability.rs:29:1
|
LL | / impl const Bar for Foo {
LL | |
LL | | fn fun() {}
LL | | }
| |_^
error: function has missing const stability attribute
--> $DIR/missing-const-stability.rs:36:1
|
LL | pub const unsafe fn size_of_val<T>(x: *const T) -> usize { 42 }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: associated function has missing const stability attribute
--> $DIR/missing-const-stability.rs:16:5
|
LL | pub const fn foo() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors; 1 warning emitted