os-rust/compiler/rustc_feature
Dylan DPC f5e9cb53ab
Rollup merge of #97720 - cjgillot:all-fresh, r=petrochenkov
Always create elided lifetime parameters for functions

Anonymous and elided lifetimes in functions are sometimes (async fns) --and sometimes not (regular fns)-- desugared to implicit generic parameters.

This difference of treatment makes it some downstream analyses more complicated to handle.  This step is a pre-requisite to perform lifetime elision resolution on AST.

There is currently an inconsistency in the treatment of argument-position impl-trait for functions and async fns:
```rust
trait Foo<'a> {}
fn foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ OK
fn bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ OK
```

The current implementation reports "missing lifetime specifier" on `foo`, but **accepts it** in `async_foo`.
This PR **proposes to accept** the anonymous lifetime in both cases as an extra generic lifetime parameter.
This change would be insta-stable, so let's ping t-lang.
Anonymous lifetimes in GAT bindings keep being forbidden:
```rust
fn foo(t: impl Foo<Assoc<'_> = Bar<'_>>) {}
                         ^^        ^^
                       forbidden   ok
```
I started a discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Anonymous.20lifetimes.20in.20universal.20impl-trait/near/284968606

r? ``@petrochenkov``
2022-07-14 14:14:19 +05:30
..
src Rollup merge of #97720 - cjgillot:all-fresh, r=petrochenkov 2022-07-14 14:14:19 +05:30
Cargo.toml Migrate to 2021 2021-09-20 22:21:42 -04:00