diagnostics: do not suggest `fn foo({ <body> }`
Instead of suggesting that the body always replace the last character on the line, presuming it must be a semicolon, the parser should instead check what the last character is, and append the body if it is anything else.
Fixes#83104
Rename `~const Drop` to `~const Destruct`
r? `@oli-obk`
Completely switching to `~const Destructible` would be rather complicated, so it seems best to add it for now and wait for it to be backported to beta in the next release.
The rationale is to prevent complications such as #92149 and #94803 by introducing an entirely new trait. And `~const Destructible` reads a bit better than `~const Drop`. Name Bikesheddable.
interpret/validity: improve clarity
I was confused by my own (ancient) comment in `validity.rs` so I figured I'd clarify. (And I don't think ZST-ness is relevant at all inside that branch, no idea where that comment comes from.)
Also `extend` seems more clear than `clone_from`.
Fold aarch64 feature +fp into +neon
Arm's FEAT_FP and Feat_AdvSIMD describe the same thing on AArch64:
The Neon unit, which handles both floating point and SIMD instructions.
Moreover, a configuration for AArch64 must include both or neither.
Arm says "entirely proprietary" toolchains may omit floating point:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102374/0101/Data-processing---floating-point
In the Programmer's Guide for Armv8-A, Arm says AArch64 can have
both FP and Neon or neither in custom implementations:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/AArch64-Floating-point-and-NEON
In "Bare metal boot code for Armv8-A", enabling Neon and FP
is just disabling the same trap flag:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dai0527/a
In an unlikely future where "Neon and FP" become unrelated,
we can add "[+-]fp" as its own feature flag.
Until then, we can simplify programming with Rust on AArch64 by
folding both into "[+-]neon", which is valid as it supersets both.
"[+-]neon" is retained for niche uses such as firmware, kernels,
"I just hate floats", and so on.
I am... pretty sure no one is relying on this.
An argument could be made that, as we are not an "entirely proprietary" toolchain, we should not support AArch64 without floats at all. I think that's a bit excessive. However, I want to recognize the intent: programming for AArch64 should be simplified where possible. For x86-64, programmers regularly set up illegal feature configurations because it's hard to understand them, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89586. And per the above notes, plus the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86941, there should be no real use cases for leaving these features split: the two should in fact always go together.
- Fixesrust-lang/rust#95002.
- Fixesrust-lang/rust#95064.
- Fixesrust-lang/rust#95122.
Instead of suggesting that the body always replace the last character on the
line, presuming it must be a semicolon, the parser should instead check what
the last character is, and append the body if it is anything else.
Fixes#83104
Arm's FEAT_FP and Feat_AdvSIMD describe the same thing on AArch64:
The Neon unit, which handles both floating point and SIMD instructions.
Moreover, a configuration for AArch64 must include both or neither.
Arm says "entirely proprietary" toolchains may omit floating point:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102374/0101/Data-processing---floating-point
In the Programmer's Guide for Armv8-A, Arm says AArch64 can have
both FP and Neon or neither in custom implementations:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/AArch64-Floating-point-and-NEON
In "Bare metal boot code for Armv8-A", enabling Neon and FP
is just disabling the same trap flag:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dai0527/a
In an unlikely future where "Neon and FP" become unrelated,
we can add "[+-]fp" as its own feature flag.
Until then, we can simplify programming with Rust on AArch64 by
folding both into "[+-]neon", which is valid as it supersets both.
"[+-]neon" is retained for niche uses such as firmware, kernels,
"I just hate floats", and so on.
Introduce `TtParser`
These commits make a number of changes to declarative macro expansion, resulting in code that is shorter, simpler, and faster.
Best reviewed one commit at a time.
r? `@petrochenkov`
As its name suggests, `TokenTreeOrTokenTreeSlice` is either a single
`TokenTree` or a slice of them. It has methods `len` and `get_tt` that
let it be treated much like an ordinary slice. The reason it isn't an
ordinary slice is that for `TokenTree::Delimited` the open and close
delimiters are represented implicitly, and when they are needed they are
constructed on the fly with `Delimited::{open,close}_tt`, rather than
being present in memory.
This commit changes `Delimited` so the open and close delimiters are
represented explicitly. As a result, `TokenTreeOrTokenTreeSlice` is no
longer needed and `MatcherPos` and `MatcherTtFrame` can just use an
ordinary slice. `TokenTree::{len,get_tt}` are also removed, because they
were only needed to support `TokenTreeOrTokenTreeSlice`.
The change makes the code shorter and a little bit faster on benchmarks
that use macro expansion heavily, partly because `MatcherPos` is a lot
smaller (less data to `memcpy`) and partly because ordinary slice
operations are faster than `TokenTreeOrTokenTreeSlice::{len,get_tt}`.
Suggest constraining param for unary ops when missing trait impl
This PR adds a suggestion of constraining param for unary ops `-` and `!` when the corresponding trait implementation
is missing.
Fixs #94543.
BTW, this is my first time to touch rustc, please correct me if I did anything wrong.
rename LocalState::Uninitialized to Unallocated
This is to avoid confusion with `Uninit` as in `ScalarMaybeUninit`, which is very different.
r? `@oli-obk`
Inline some parser functions
Some crates that do a lot of complex declarative macro expansion spend a lot of time parsing (and reparsing) tokens. These commits inline some functions for some minor speed wins.
r? `@ghost`
Disable almost certainly unsound early otherwise branch MIR opt
Originally thought this was just an MIR semantics issue, but it's not.
r? rust-lang/mir-opt
The call site within `Parser::bump` is hot.
Also add an inline annotation to `Parser::next_tok`. It was already
being inlined by the compiler; this just makes sure that continues.
Return err instead of ICE
Having `escaping_bound_vars` results in ICE when trying to create `ty::Binder::dummy`, to avoid it we return err like the line above. I think this requires a more sophisticated fix, I would love to investigate if mentorship is available 🤓Fixes#95023 and #85350
