Add two options when building rust: strip and stack protector.
If set `strip = true`, symbols will be stripped using `-Cstrip=symbols`.
Also can set `stack-protector` and stack protectors will be used.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118508 (rustdoc: do not escape quotes in body text)
- #118565 (interpret: make numeric_intrinsic accessible from Miri)
- #118591 (portable-simd: fix test suite build)
- #118600 ([rustdoc] Don't generate the "Fields" heading if there is no field displayed)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
[rustdoc] Don't generate the "Fields" heading if there is no field displayed
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118195.
If no field is displayed, we should not generate the `Fields` heading in enum struct variants.
r? ``@notriddle``
portable-simd: fix test suite build
``@workingjubilee`` ``@calebzulawski`` don't we run these portable-simd tests on rustc CI? Currently they don't even build here.
rustdoc: do not escape quotes in body text
Escaping quote marks is only needed in attributes, not text.
```console
$ du -hs doc-old/ doc-new/
670M doc-old/
669M doc-new/
```
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118495 (Restrict what symbols can be used in `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` format strings)
- #118540 (codegen, miri: fix computing the offset of an unsized field in a packed struct)
- #118551 (more targeted errors when extern types end up in places they should not)
- #118573 (rustc: Harmonize `DefKind` and `DefPathData`)
- #118586 (Improve example in `slice::windows()` doc)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't ask for a specific branch in cargotest
Tentative fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118592#issuecomment-1838180918.
`servo` [just renamed](https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/30788) their `master` branch to `main`, but `cargotest` does a `git fetch $URL master; git reset --hard $SHA`. Let's try to change that to `git fetch $URL $SHA; git reset --hard $SHA`, which appears to work, but I can't confirm for sure because I'm having some trouble with `x.py`:
```
--> library/rustc-std-workspace-core/lib.rs:4:9
|
4 | pub use core::*;
| ^^^^
|
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `core` compiled by rustc 1.76.0-nightly (85a4bd8f5 2023-12-04): ./build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1-std/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/libcore-70719e8645e6f000.rmeta
= help: please recompile that crate using this compiler (rustc 1.76.0-nightly (5808b7248 2023-12-04)) (consider running `cargo clean` first)
```
Improve example in `slice::windows()` doc
Fixes#118571
Now using a window of 3 instead 2 because it removes any confusion about exactly how consecutive windows overlap
rustc: Harmonize `DefKind` and `DefPathData`
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118188.
`DefPathData::(ClosureExpr,ImplTrait)` are renamed to match `DefKind::(Closure,OpaqueTy)`.
`DefPathData::ImplTraitAssocTy` is replaced with `DefPathData::TypeNS(kw::Empty)` because both correspond to `DefKind::AssocTy`.
It's possible that introducing `(DefKind,DefPathData)::AssocOpaqueTy` instead could be a better solution, but that would be a much more invasive change.
Const generic parameters introduced for effects are moved from `DefPathData::TypeNS` to `DefPathData::ValueNS`, because constants are values.
`DefPathData` is no longer passed to `create_def` functions to avoid redundancy.
more targeted errors when extern types end up in places they should not
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115709 -- this does not fix that bug but it makes the panics less obscure and makes it more clear that this is a deeper issue than just a little codegen oversight. (In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116115 we decided we'd stick to causing ICEs here for now, rather than nicer errors. We can't currently show any errors pre-mono and probably we don't want post-mono checks when this gets stabilized anyway.)
Restrict what symbols can be used in `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` format strings
This commit restricts what symbols can be used in a format string for any option of the `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` attribute. We previously allowed all the ad-hoc options supported by the internal `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` attribute. For the stable attribute we only want to support generic parameter names and `{Self}` as parameters. For any other parameter an warning is emitted and the parameter is replaced by the literal parameter string, so for example `{integer}` turns into `{integer}`. This follows the general design of attributes in the `#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace, that any syntax "error" is treated as warning and subsequently ignored.
r? `@compiler-errors`
This commit restricts what symbols can be used in a format string for
any option of the `diagnostic::on_unimplemented` attribute. We
previously allowed all the ad-hoc options supported by the internal
`#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` attribute. For the stable attribute we only
want to support generic parameter names and `{Self}` as parameters. For
any other parameter an warning is emitted and the parameter is replaced
by the literal parameter string, so for example `{integer}` turns into
`{integer}`. This follows the general design of attributes in the
`#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace, that any syntax "error" is treated
as warning and subsequently ignored.
Exhaustiveness: allocate memory better
Exhaustiveness is a recursive algorithm that allocates a bunch of slices at every step. Let's see if I can improve performance by improving allocations.
Already just using `Vec::with_capacity` is showing impressive improvements on my local measurements.
r? `@ghost`
miri: support 'promising' alignment for symbolic alignment check
Then use that ability in `slice::align_to`, so that even with `-Zmiri-symbolic-alignment-check`, it no longer has to return spuriously empty "middle" parts.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3068
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #117869 ([rustdoc] Add highlighting for comments in items declaration)
- #118525 (coverage: Skip spans that can't be un-expanded back to the function body)
- #118574 (rustc_session: Address all `rustc::potential_query_instability` lints)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustc_session: Address all `rustc::potential_query_instability` lints
Instead of allowing `rustc::potential_query_instability` on the whole crate we go over each lint and allow it individually if it is safe to do. Turns out all instances were safe to allow in this crate.
Part of #84447 which is **E-help-wanted**.
coverage: Skip spans that can't be un-expanded back to the function body
When we extract coverage spans from MIR, we try to "un-expand" them back to spans that are inside the function's body span.
In cases where that doesn't succeed, the current code just swaps in the entire body span instead. But that tends to result in coverage spans that are completely unrelated to the control flow of the affected code, so it's better to just discard those spans.
---
Extracted from #118305, since this is a general improvement that isn't specific to branch coverage.
---
`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
[rustdoc] Add highlighting for comments in items declaration
Fixes#117555.
So after the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117643, the outcome was that having the comments in the item declaration at the same level (in term of color) as the rest of the code was actually a bit distracting and could be improved.
The current highlighting color for comments is "lighter" than the rest and I think it fits perfectly to improve the current situation. With this, we now have different "levels" which makes it easier to read and filter out what we want when reading the items declaration.
Here's a screenshot:
r? `@notriddle`
Provide structured suggestion for type mismatch in loop
We currently provide only a `help` message, this PR introduces the last two structured suggestions instead:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/issue-98982.rs:2:5
|
LL | fn foo() -> i32 {
| --- expected `i32` because of return type
LL | / for i in 0..0 {
LL | | return i;
LL | | }
| |_____^ expected `i32`, found `()`
|
note: the function expects a value to always be returned, but loops might run zero times
--> $DIR/issue-98982.rs:2:5
|
LL | for i in 0..0 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this might have zero elements to iterate on
LL | return i;
| -------- if the loop doesn't execute, this value would never get returned
help: return a value for the case when the loop has zero elements to iterate on
|
LL ~ }
LL ~ /* `i32` value */
|
help: otherwise consider changing the return type to account for that possibility
|
LL ~ fn foo() -> Option<i32> {
LL | for i in 0..0 {
LL ~ return Some(i);
LL ~ }
LL ~ None
|
```
Fix#98982.
Report errors in jobserver inherited through environment variables
This pr attempts to catch situations, when jobserver exists, but is not being inherited.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Instead of allowing `rustc::potential_query_instability` on the whole
crate we go over each lint and allow it individually if it is safe to
do. Turns out all instances were safe to allow in this crate.
`DefPathData::(ClosureExpr,ImplTrait)` are renamed to match `DefKind::(Closure,OpaqueTy)`.
`DefPathData::ImplTraitAssocTy` is replaced with `DefPathData::TypeNS(kw::Empty)` because both correspond to `DefKind::AssocTy`.
It's possible that introducing `(DefKind,DefPathData)::AssocOpaqueTy` could be a better solution, but that would be a much more invasive change.
Const generic parameters introduced for effects are moved from `DefPathData::TypeNS` to `DefPathData::ValueNS`, because constants are values.
`DefPathData` is no longer passed to `create_def` functions to avoid redundancy.
move exposed-provenance APIs into separate feature gate
We have already stated explicitly for all the 'exposed' functions that
> Using this method means that code is *not* following strict provenance rules.
However, they were part of the same feature gate and still described as part of the strict provenance experiment. Unfortunately, their semantics are much less clear and certainly nowhere near stabilization, so in preparation for an attempt to stabilize the strict provenance APIs, I suggest we split the things related to "exposed" into their own feature gate. I also used this opportunity to better explain how Exposed Provenance fits into the larger plan here: this is *one possible candidate* for `as` semantics, but we don't know if it is actually viable, so we can't really promise that it is equivalent to `as`. If it works out we probably want to make `as` equivalent to the 'exposed' APIs; if it doesn't, we will remove them again and try to find some other semantics for `as`.
