Let nils know about changes to target docs
i'll probably expand the paths and add a message after #121051 but i honestly don't expect that to land very soon lol, so it would be nice to get notified about changes already and watch what's happening there
approve this pr if you're cool
`num::NonZero::get` can be 1 transmute instead of 2
Just something I noticed in passing. No need for a `match` in here to call `unreachable_unchecked`, as `transmute_unchecked` will add the appropriate `llvm.assume` <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/W5hjeETnc>.
Delegation: fix ICE on wrong `Self` instantiation
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119921
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119919
There is no way to instantiate `Self` param for caller in delegation item if
1. callee is a trait method && callee contains `Self` param
2. delegation item isn't an associative item
In general, we can consider `Self` param as independent type param in these cases:
```rust
trait Trait {
fn foo(_: Option<&Self>) {...}
}
reuse Trait::foo;
// will be desugared to:
fn foo<T: Trait>(x: Option<&T>) { Trait::foo(x) }
```
But this requires early bound parameters support. For now, I suggest banning such cases to avoid ICE's.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
CFI: Fix drop and drop_in_place
Fix drop and drop_in_place by transforming self of drop and drop_in_place methods into a Drop trait objects.
This was split off from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116404.
cc `@compiler-errors` `@workingjubilee`
Clarify atomic bit validity
The previous definition used the phrase "representation", which is ambiguous given the current state of memory model nomenclature in Rust. For integer types and for `AtomicPtr<T>`, the new wording clarifies that size and bit validity are guaranteed to match the corresponding native integer type/`*mut T`. For `AtomicBool`, the new wording clarifies that size, alignment, and bit validity are guaranteed to match `bool`.
Note that we use the phrase "size and alignment" rather than "layout" since the latter term also implies that the field types are the same. This isn't true - `AtomicXxx` doesn't store an `xxx`, but rather an `UnsafeCell<xxx>`. This distinction is important for some `unsafe` code, which needs to reason about the presence or absence of interior mutability in order to ensure that their code is sound (see e.g. https://github.com/google/zerocopy/issues/251).
Rework rmake support library API
### Take 1: Strongly-typed API
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122448#discussion_r1523774427
> My 2 cents: from my experience with writing similar "test DSLs", I would suggest to create these helpers as soon as possible in the process (basically the first time someone needs them, not only after N similar usages), and basically treat any imperative code in these high-level tests as a maintenance burden, basically making them as declarative as possible. Otherwise it might be a bit annoying to keep refactoring the tests later once such helpers are available.
>
> I would even discourage the arg method and create explicit methods for setting things like unpretty, the output file etc., but this might be more controversial, as it will make the invoked command-line arguments more opaque.
cc `@Kobzol` for the testing DSL suggestion.
Example:
```rs
let output = Rustc::new()
.input_file("main.rs")
.emit(&[EmitKind::Metadata])
.extern_("stable", &stable_path)
.output();
```
### Take 2: xshell-based macro API
Example:
```rs
let sh = Shell::new()?;
let stable_path = stable_path.to_string_lossy();
let output = cmd!(sh, "rustc main.rs --emit=metadata --extern stable={stable_path}").output()?;
```
### Take 3: Weakly-typed API with a few helper methods
```rs
let output = Rustc::new()
.input("main.rs")
.emit("metadata")
.extern_("stable", &stable_path)
.output();
```
Stop doing expensive work in `opt_suggest_box_span` eagerly
This PR defers the `can_coerce` and `predicate_must_hold_modulo_regions` calls in `opt_suggest_box_span`, and instead defers it until error reporting. This requires pulling the logic out of `note_obligation_cause_code` and into coercion, where we have access to the trait solver.
This also allows us to remove `TypeVariableOriginKind::OpaqueTypeInference`.
CFI: Enable KCFI testing of run-pass tests
This enables KCFI-based testing for all the CFI run-pass tests in the suite today. We can add the test header on top of in-flight CFI tests once they land. This is becoming more important as we get closer to leveraging CFI's multiple type attachment feature, as that is where the implementations will have a divergence.
It also enables KCFI as a sanitizer for x86_64 and aarch64 Linux to make this possible. The sanitizer should likely be available for all aarch64, x86_64, and riscv targets, but that isn't critical for initial testing.
Make `TyCtxt::coroutine_layout` take coroutine's kind parameter
For coroutines that come from coroutine-closures (i.e. async closures), we may have two kinds of bodies stored in the coroutine; one that takes the closure's captures by reference, and one that takes the captures by move.
These currently have identical layouts, but if we do any optimization for these layouts that are related to the upvars, then they will diverge -- e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120168#discussion_r1536943728.
This PR relaxes the assertion I added in #121122, and instead make the `TyCtxt::coroutine_layout` method take the `coroutine_kind_ty` argument from the coroutine, which will allow us to differentiate these by-move and by-ref bodies.
coverage: Re-enable `UnreachablePropagation` for coverage builds
This is a sequence of 3 related changes:
- Clean up the existing code that scans for unused functions
- Detect functions that were instrumented for coverage, but have had all their coverage statements removed by later MIR transforms (e.g. `UnreachablePropagation`)
- Re-enable `UnreachablePropagation` in coverage builds
Because we now detect functions that have lost their coverage statements, and treat them as unused, we don't need to worry about `UnreachablePropagation` removing all of those statements. This is demonstrated by `tests/coverage/unreachable.rs`.
Fixes#116171.
Soft-destabilize `RustcEncodable` & `RustcDecodable`, remove from prelude in next edition
cc rust-lang/libs-team#272
Any use of `RustcEncodable` and `RustcDecodable` now triggers a deny-by-default lint. The derives have been removed from the 2024 prelude. I specifically chose **not** to document this in the module-level documentation, as the presence in existing preludes is not documented (which I presume is intentional).
This does not implement the proposed change for `rustfix`, which I will be looking into shortly.
With regard to the items in the preludes being stable, this should not be an issue because #15702 has been resolved.
r? libs-api
Update `RwLock` deadlock example to not use shadowing
Tweak variable names in the deadlock example to remove any potential confusion that the behavior is somehow shadowing-related.
Implement `Vec::pop_if`
This PR adds `Vec::pop_if` to the public API, behind the `vec_pop_if` feature.
```rust
impl<T> Vec<T> {
pub fn pop_if<F>(&mut self, f: F) -> Option<T>
where F: FnOnce(&mut T) -> bool;
}
```
Tracking issue: #122741
## Open questions
- [ ] Should the first unit test be split up?
- [ ] I don't see any guidance on ordering of methods in impl blocks, should I move the method elsewhere?
match lowering: build the `Place` instead of keeping a `PlaceBuilder` around
Outside of `MatchPair::new` we don't construct new places, so we don't need to keep a `PlaceBuilder` around.
A bit annoyingly we have to store an `Option<Place>` even though it's never `None` after simplification, but the alternative would be to re-entangle `MatchPair` construction and simplification and I'd rather not do that.
Previously, the documentation for a variant appeared after the documentation
for each of its fields. This was inconsistent with structs and unions, and made
little sense on its own; fields are subordinate to variants and should
therefore appear later in the documentation.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108675 (Document `adt_const_params` feature in Unstable Book)
- #122120 (Suggest associated type bounds on problematic associated equality bounds)
- #122589 (Fix diagnostics for async block cloning)
- #122835 (Require `DerefMut` and `DerefPure` on `deref!()` patterns when appropriate)
- #123049 (In `ConstructCoroutineInClosureShim`, pass receiver by mut ref, not mut pointer)
- #123055 (enable cargo miri test doctests)
- #123057 (unix fs: Make hurd using explicit new rather than From)
- #123087 (Change `f16` and `f128` clippy stubs to be nonpanicking)
- #123103 (Rename `Inherited` -> `TypeckRootCtxt`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rename `Inherited` -> `TypeckRootCtxt`
`Inherited` is a confusing name. Rename it to `TypeckRootCtxt`.
I don't think this needs a type MCP or anything since it's not nearly as pervasive as `FnCtxt` , for example.
r? `@lcnr` `@oli-obk`
Change `f16` and `f128` clippy stubs to be nonpanicking
It turns out there is a bit of a circular dependency - I cannot add anything to `core` because Clippy fails, and I can't actually add correct Clippy implementations without new implementations from `core`.
Change some of the Clippy stubs from `unimplemented!` to success values and leave a FIXME in their place to mitigate this.
Fixes <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122587>
